Surface modification of polyethylene terephthalate with albumin and gelatin for improvement of anticoagulation and endothelialization
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The surfaces of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were modified by oxygen plasma-induced and ultraviolet (UV)-assisted acrylic acid (AAc) grafting polymerization, and the carboxyl ( COOH) groups on the PET surface was 5.29 × 10 −9 mol/cm 2 . Then using the COOH as reacting sites, the molecules of gelatin and bovine serum albumin (BSA) were further co-immobilized on the PET surface. The modified PET surfaces were characterized by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and surface chemical quantitative analysis. The results showed that the molecules of gelatin and albumin were immobilized on the PET surface. The concentration of gelatin on the gelatin-immobilized PET surface was 2.02 μg/cm 2 . For the gelatin-immobilized PET surface, the human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) culture attachment and proliferation ratios were improved, but the anticoagulation became worse proved by platelet adhesion test in vitro and the lactate dehydrogense (LDH) test. After further co-immobilization of albumin with gelatin biomolecules on the PET surface (PET-Gel–BSA), the percent of platelet adhesion in vitro decreased 28% than that on the gelatin-immobilized PET surface, and the cell density on the PET-Gel–BSA film (1.08 × 10 5 cells/cm 2 ) was significantly higher than that on the control PET surface. This investigation tries to find a method which can construct the anticoagulant surface before the endothelium formation and also accelerate the endothelialization of polymer surface.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Hemostasis and retained surgical items · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (15)
Show source-provided references
1. Yang · Nucl. Instrum. Method B. · 2006 · 242 · 1510.1016/j.nimb.2005.08.099 ↗
2. Zhu · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 424
3. Jing · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2007 · 201 · 687410.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.09.088 ↗
4. Suh · Biomaterials · 2001 · 22 · 21910.1016/S0142-9612(00)00177-0 ↗
5. Bisson · Biomaterials · 2002 · 23 · 314910.1016/S0142-9612(02)00061-3 ↗
6. Li · Biomaterials · 1998 · 19 · 4510.1016/S0142-9612(97)00154-3 ↗
7. Zhu · Anal. Biochem. · 2007 · 363 · 11910.1016/j.ab.2007.01.007 ↗
8. Suggs · Biomaterials · 1999 · 20 · 68310.1016/S0142-9612(98)00226-9 ↗
9. Cheng · Biomaterials · 2004 · 25 · 199110.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.038 ↗
10. Chen · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2004 · 186 · 27010.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.02.050 ↗
11. Punshona · Biomaterials · 2005 · 26 · 627110.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.03.034 ↗
12. Khan · Acta Biomater. · 2007 · 3 · 54110.1016/j.actbio.2007.01.006 ↗
13. Li · J. Colloid. Interf. Sci. · 2004 · 275 · 48810.1016/j.jcis.2004.02.060 ↗
14. Wang · Surf. Coat. Technol. · 2005 · 196 · 30710.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.08.161 ↗
15. Comparative in vitro analysis of topical hemostatic agent10.1006/jsre.1996.0379 ↗