On the combination of ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy with optical absorption studies to investigate Cu2O||TiO2 direct Z-scheme junctions with different Cu2O loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Among the electronic properties, the positions of the electronic band edges and the work function are essential parameters for determining the potential of a photocatalyst and its ability to function in a solar conversion system. A novel type of photocatalysts, called direct Z-schemes, possesses many advantages over conventional heterojunctions, which all benefit the catalytic performance under solar light. As oxidation and reduction reactions are greatly affected by the electrical characteristics of the material, ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy (UPS) is a powerful tool to determine and quantify important electronic parameters of previously fabricated TiO2‖Cu2O junctions. TiO2 nanotubes modified with Cu2O nanoparticles exhibit a reduction in the value of the work function (WF = 3.67 ± 0.01 eV) and ionization potential (IP = 6.01 ± 0.04 eV) with respect to the TiO2 substrate (WF = 4.29 ± 0.02 eV and IP = 7.65 ± 0.05 eV). By varying the electrodeposition time, an optimized amount of deposited Cu2O nanoparticles was proven to reduce the WF and IP to facilitate the excitation of electrons, which could be correlated to the improved absorbance in the visible wavelength range. This work proposes a valuable methodology for band diagram tracing from UPS spectra and provides new insights in the relationship between synthesis, electronic properties and visible light absorption of titania based Z-schemes for photocatalytic applications with a combination of surface sensitive techniques and optical absorption studies.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. S. Chu, A. Majumdar, “Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future,” Nature, vol. 488, no. 7411. pp. 294–303, Aug. 16, 2012. doi: 10.1038/nature11475.10.1038/nature11475 ↗
2. N.S. Lewis, D.G. Nocera, “Powering the planet: Chemical challenges in solar energy utilization,” 2006. [Online]. Available: www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0603395103.
3. B. Kumar, M. Llorente, J. Froehlich, T. Dang, A. Sathrum, C.P. Kubiak, “Photochemical and photoelectrochemical reduction of CO2,” Annual Review of Physical Chemistry, vol. 63. Annual Reviews Inc., pp. 541–569, 2012. doi: 10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143759.10.1146/annurev-physchem-032511-143759 ↗
4. Artificial photosynthesis: current advancements and future prospects10.3390/biomimetics8030298 ↗
5. Solar fuels via artificial photosynthesis10.1021/ar900209b ↗
6. Photoelectrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide in aqueous suspensions of semiconductor powders10.1038/277637a0 ↗
7. X. Shao et al., “Metal chalcogenide-associated catalysts enabling CO2electroreduction to produce low-carbon fuels for energy storage and emission reduction: catalyst structure, morphology, performance, and mechanism,” Journal of Materials Chemistry A, vol. 9, no. 5. Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 2526–2559, Feb. 07, 2021. doi: 10.1039/d0ta09232k.10.1039/D0TA09232K ↗
8. J. Cai, J. Huang, M. Ge, and Y. Lai, “Multidimensional TiO2 nanostructured catalysts for sustainable H2 generation,” in Multifunctional Photocatalytic Materials for Energy, Elsevier Inc., 2018, pp. 237–288. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-08-101977-1.00012-0.10.1016/B978-0-08-101977-1.00012-0 ↗
9. H. Park, H. il Kim, G. H. Moon, and W. Choi, “Photoinduced charge transfer processes in solar photocatalysis based on modified TiO2,” Energy Environ Sci, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 411–433, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1039/c5ee02575c.10.1039/C5EE02575C ↗
10. R. Li, T. Li, and Q. Zhou, “Impact of titanium dioxide (TiO2) modification on its application to pollution treatment—a review,” Catalysts, vol. 10, no. 7. MDPI, Jul. 01, 2020. doi: 10.3390/catal10070804.10.3390/catal10070804 ↗
11. M. Mishra and D. M. Chun, “α-Fe2O3 as a photocatalytic material: A review,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 498. Elsevier B.V., pp. 126–141, Jun. 05, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.023.10.1016/j.apcata.2015.03.023 ↗
12. Synergetic effects of Cu2O photocatalyst with titania and enhanced photoactivity under visible irradiation10.2478/acs-2013-0022 ↗
13. Preparation of ZnO/Cu2O compound photocatalyst and application in treating organic dyes10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.11.106 ↗
14. A. Malathi, J. Madhavan, M. Ashokkumar, and P. Arunachalam, “A review on BiVO4 photocatalyst: Activity enhancement methods for solar photocatalytic applications,” Applied Catalysis A: General, vol. 555. Elsevier B.V., pp. 47–74, Apr. 05, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.02.010.10.1016/j.apcata.2018.02.010 ↗
15. Rational band gap engineering of WO 3 photocatalyst for visible light water splitting10.1002/cctc.201100446 ↗
16. WO 3 photocatalysts: influence of structure and composition10.1016/j.jcat.2012.07.013 ↗
17. Q. Xu, L. Zhang, J. Yu, S. Wageh, A. A. Al-Ghamdi, and M. Jaroniec, “Direct Z-scheme photocatalysts: Principles, synthesis, and applications,” Materials Today, vol. 21, no. 10. Elsevier B.V., pp. 1042–1063, Dec. 01, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.008.10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.008 ↗
18. J. Low, C. Jiang, B. Cheng, S. Wageh, A.A. Al-Ghamdi, J. Yu, “A Review of Direct Z-scheme photocatalysts,” Small Methods, vol. 1, no. 5. John Wiley and Sons Inc, May 01, 2017. doi: 10.1002/smtd.201700080.10.1002/smtd.201700080 ↗
19. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4 for selective CO2 reduction to CH3OH via facile coupling of ZnO: a direct Z-scheme mechanism10.1039/C5TA05503B ↗
20. P. Zhou, J. Yu, M. Jaroniec, “All-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems,” Advanced Materials, vol. 26, no. 29. Wiley-VCH Verlag, pp. 4920–4935, Aug. 06, 2014. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400288.10.1002/adma.201400288 ↗
21. TiO 2 photocatalysis: design and applications10.1016/j.jphotochemrev.2012.06.001 ↗
22. Y. Wang, M. Zu, X. Zhou, H. Lin, F. Peng, and S. Zhang, “Designing efficient TiO2-based photoelectrocatalysis systems for chemical engineering and sensing,” Chemical Engineering Journal, vol. 381. Elsevier B.V., Feb. 01, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122605.10.1016/j.cej.2019.122605 ↗
23. Highly efficient degradation of persistent pollutants with 3d nanocone TiO2-based photoelectrocatalysis10.1021/jacs.1c05008 ↗
24. L. Kavan, “Conduction band engineering in semiconducting oxides (TiO2, SnO2): Applications in perovskite photovoltaics and beyond,” Catalysis Today, vol. 328. Elsevier B.V., pp. 50–56, May 15, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.065.10.1016/j.cattod.2018.10.065 ↗
25. Electrons in nanostructured TiO2 solar cells: transport, recombination and photovoltaic properties10.1016/j.ccr.2004.03.015 ↗
26. Self-organized TiO2 nanotube layers as highly efficient photocatalysts10.1002/smll.200600426 ↗
27. H. Dong et al., “An overview on limitations of TiO2-based particles for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants and the corresponding countermeasures,” Water Research, vol. 79. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 128–146, Aug. 01, 2015. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.038.10.1016/j.watres.2015.04.038 ↗
28. D. Gong et al., “RAPID COMMUNICATIONS Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation,” 2001.10.1557/JMR.2001.0457 ↗
29. Synthesis and application of highly ordered arrays of TiO2 nanotubes10.1039/b701168g ↗
30. Cu2O/TiO2 heterostructures for CO2 reduction through a direct Z-scheme: protecting Cu2O from photocorrosion10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.05.058 ↗
31. Reliable work function determination of multicomponent surfaces and interfaces: the role of electrostatic potentials in ultraviolet photoelectron spectroscopy10.1002/admi.201700324 ↗
32. The work function of TiO210.3390/surfaces1010007 ↗
33. A. Kahn, “Fermi level, work function and vacuum level,” Materials Horizons, vol. 3, no. 1. Royal Society of Chemistry, pp. 7–10, Jan. 01, 2016. doi: 10.1039/c5mh00160a.10.1039/C5MH00160A ↗
34. Fundamental physics of vacuum electron sources10.1088/0034-4885/69/1/R04 ↗
35. R. W. Strayer, W. Mackie, and L. W. Swanson, “Work function measurements by the field emission retarding potential method*.”.
36. J.S. Kim et al., “Synthetic Metals 111-112,” 2000. [Online]. Available: www.elsevier.comrlocatersynmet.
37. J.W. Kim, A. Kim, “Absolute work function measurement by using photoelectron spectroscopy,” Current Applied Physics, vol. 31. 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.cap.2021.07.018.10.1016/j.cap.2021.07.018 ↗
38. W.C. Price, “Photoelectron spectroscopy A. Introductory Survey.”.
39. Schlaf · 2001
40. A facile method for preparation of Cu2O-TiO2 NTA heterojunction with visible-photocatalytic activity10.1186/s11671-018-2637-8 ↗
41. Octahedral Cu2O-modified TiO2 nanotube arrays for efficient photocatalytic reduction of CO210.1016/S1872-2067(15)60991-3 ↗
42. I. Robel, M. Kuno, and P. v. Kamat, “Size-dependent electron injection from excited CdSe quantum dots into TiO2 nanoparticles,” J Am Chem Soc, vol. 129, no. 14, pp. 4136–4137, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.1021/ja070099a.10.1021/ja070099a ↗
43. D. R. Baker and P. v. Kamat, “Photosensitization of TiO2 nanostructures with CdS quantum dots: Particulate versus tubular support architectures,” Adv Funct Mater, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 805–811, Mar. 2009, doi: 10.1002/adfm.200801173.10.1002/adfm.200801173 ↗
44. Filling of TiO2 nanotubes by self-doping and electrodeposition10.1002/adma.200602549 ↗
45. The distribution of hydroxyl ions at the surface of anodic alumina10.1002/sia.1585 ↗
46. Accessing the robustness of adventitious carbon for charge referencing (correction) purposes in XPS analysis: insights from a multi-user facility data review10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153681 ↗
47. Mechanistic investigation on tuning the conductivity type of cuprous oxide (Cu2O) thin films via deposition potential10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.02.121 ↗
48. Resolving surface chemical states in XPS analysis of first row transition metals, oxides and hydroxides: sc, ti, V, cu and zn10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.07.086 ↗
49. Tuning oxygen vacancy content in TiO2 nanoparticles to enhance the photocatalytic performance10.1016/j.ces.2021.116440 ↗
50. Introductory guide to the application of XPS to epitaxial films and heterostructures10.1116/6.0000465 ↗
51. Visible-light photocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide into methane using Cu2O/TiO2 hollow nanospheres10.1002/cjoc.201400476 ↗
52. W. M. Haynes, “CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics 95th Edition.”.
53. J. Balajka et al., “High-affinity adsorption leads to molecularly ordered interfaces on TiO2 in air and solution,” Science (1979), vol. 361, no. 6404, pp. 786–789, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aat6752.10.1126/science.aat6752 ↗
54. A. Klein, “Transparent conducting oxides: Electronic structure-property relationship from photoelectron spectroscopy with in situ sample preparation,” J. Am. Ceramic Soc., vol. 96, no. 2, 2013, doi: 10.1111/jace.12143.10.1111/jace.12143 ↗
55. Charles Kittel, Introduction to Solid State Physics. 2005.