Plasma-assisted CuO/CeO2/TiO2-γ-Al2O3 catalysts for NO+CH4 reaction and NO temperature programmed desorption studies
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The removal of NO and CH 4 has been studied with a hybrid system integrating plasma activation and four Cu-based catalysts. The best catalytic performance was observed for catalysts obtained from CuO/CeO 2 /TiO 2 /γ-Al 2 O 3 .The efficiency of NO removal decreased with the order: 12%CuO/10%CeO 2 /15%TiO 2 /γ-Al 2 O 3 > 12%CuO/15%TiO 2 /γ-Al 2 O 3 > 12%CuO/γ-Al 2 O 3 > 12% CuO/TiO 2 . Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET), X-ray diffraction (XRD) Temperature-programmed reduction (H 2 -TPR) and NO temperature-programmed desorption (NO-TPD) experiments were carried out to gain insight into the synergetic effects with the catalysts. The results revealed that copper species existed as bulk CuO crystalline for all the catalysts, H 2 -TPR suggested that the Cu 2+ incorporated TiO 2 or CeO 2 lattice and crystalline CuO might be the most active component for NO removal, and NO-TPD studies indicated that 12%CuO/10%CeO 2 /15%TiO 2 /γ-Al 2 O 3 catalyst had lower NO desorption temperature and larger peak area, which seemed to be responsible for the better catalytic activity over NO + CH 4 reactions than other catalysts.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Catalytic Processes in Materials Science · Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions · Industrial Gas Emission Control
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Iwamoto · Chemistry Letters · 1990 · 196710.1246/cl.1990.1967 ↗
2. Mark · Catalysis Reviews · 2001 · 43 · 1
3. Vargas · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · 2004 · 74 · 110.1016/j.micromeso.2004.06.001 ↗
4. Hueso · Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2007 · 111 · 105710.1021/jp063315v ↗
5. Chen · Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research · 2003 · 42 · 668210.1021/ie030096g ↗
6. Niu · Catalysis Communications · 2006 · 7 · 29710.1016/j.catcom.2005.10.016 ↗
7. Hueso · Journal of Catalysis · 2007 · 247 · 28810.1016/j.jcat.2007.02.006 ↗
8. Yentekakis · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · 1999 · 22 · 12310.1016/S0926-3373(99)00042-9 ↗
9. Jiang · Journal of Materials Science · 2008 · 43 · 650510.1007/s10853-008-2931-4 ↗
10. Jiang · Catalysis Today · 2004 · 93–95 · 81110.1016/j.cattod.2004.06.074 ↗
11. Gutiérrez-Alejandre · Microporous and Mesoporous Materials · 1998 · 23 · 26510.1016/S1387-1811(98)00121-8 ↗
12. Caputo · Applied Catalysis A: General · 2008 · 348 · 4210.1016/j.apcata.2008.06.025 ↗
13. Sullivan · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · 2005 · 55 · 18510.1016/j.apcatb.2004.09.021 ↗
14. Meunier · Catalysis Today · 2000 · 59 · 28710.1016/S0920-5861(00)00295-9 ↗
15. Cao · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · 2008 · 78 · 12010.1016/j.apcatb.2007.09.007 ↗
16. Reddy · Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2003 · 107 · 516210.1021/jp0344601 ↗
17. Xu · Journal of the Chemical Society, Faraday Transactions · 1998 · 94 · 190510.1039/a801603h ↗
18. Wang · Journal of Solid State Chemistry · 2001 · 157 · 27410.1006/jssc.2000.9050 ↗
19. Zhu · Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical · 2004 · 219 · 15510.1016/j.molcata.2004.04.032 ↗
20. Hu · Journal of Solid State Chemistry · 2003 · 170 · 5810.1016/S0022-4596(02)00020-8 ↗
21. Luo · Journal of Catalysis · 2007 · 246 · 5210.1016/j.jcat.2006.11.021 ↗
22. Larsson · Journal of Catalysis · 1996 · 163 · 27910.1006/jcat.1996.0329 ↗
23. Suárez · Journal of Catalysis · 2005 · 229 · 22710.1016/j.jcat.2004.10.019 ↗
24. Xue · Applied Surface Science · 2008 · 255 · 259110.1016/j.apsusc.2008.07.167 ↗
25. Goula · Catalysis Today · 2007 · 127 · 19910.1016/j.cattod.2007.03.008 ↗
26. Wang · Applied Catalysis B: Environmental · 2008 · 81 · 14110.1016/j.apcatb.2007.12.005 ↗