journal article·2015-10

Modeling and experimental study of oil/water contact angle on biomimetic micro-parallel-patterned self-cleaning surfaces of selected alloys used in water industry

Simin Nickelsen, Afsaneh Dorri Moghadam, J.B. Ferguson, Pradeep Rohatgi

Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract In the present study, the wetting behavior of surfaces of various common metallic materials used in the water industry including C84400 brass, commercially pure aluminum (99.0% pure), Nickle–Molybdenum alloy (Hastelloy C22), and 316 Stainless Steel prepared by mechanical abrasion and contact angles of several materials after mechanical abrasion were measured. A model to estimate roughness factor, R f , and fraction of solid/oil interface, ƒ so , for surfaces prepared by mechanical abrasion is proposed based on the assumption that abrasive particles acting on a metallic surface would result in scratches parallel to each other and each scratch would have a semi-round cross-section. The model geometrically describes the relation between sandpaper particle size and water/oil contact angle predicted by both the Wenzel and Cassie–Baxter contact type, which can then be used for comparison with experimental data to find which regime is active. Results show that brass and Hastelloy followed Cassie–Baxter behavior, aluminum followed Wenzel behavior and stainless steel exhibited a transition from Wenzel to Cassie–Baxter. Microstructural studies have also been done to rule out effects beyond the Wenzel and Cassie–Baxter theories such as size of structural details.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. Nosonovsky · 2008
2. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
3. Wettability of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
4. Super water- and oil-repellent surfaces on intrinsically hydrophilic and oleophilic porous silicon films10.1021/la703401f ↗
5. Simple approach to superamphiphobic overhanging silicon nanostructures
6. Facile means of preparing superamphiphobic surfaces on common engineering metals
7. Inherently superoleophobic nanocomposite coatings by spray atomization10.1021/nl8037272 ↗
8. Superhydrophobic and oleophobic fibers by coaxial electrospinning10.1021/la900660v ↗
9. Fabrication of tunable superhydrophobic surfaces by nanosphere lithography10.1021/cm034696h ↗
10. Wetting and self-cleaning properties of artificial superhydrophobic surfaces10.1021/la0401011 ↗
11. Ultralow surface energy plasma polymer films10.1021/cm000193p ↗
12. Silicon surface structure-controlled oleophobicity10.1021/la904686c ↗
13. Superoleophobic surfaces through control of sprayed-on stochastic topography10.1021/la301480s ↗
14. How wenzel and cassie were wrong10.1021/la062634a ↗
15. Some theorems on the free energies of crystal surfaces10.1103/PhysRev.82.87 ↗
16. Optimal design of superhydrophobic surfaces using a semicircular protrusion microtexture10.1039/C4RA14863K ↗
17. A thermodynamic approach for determining the contact angle hysteresis for superhydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.jcis.2005.05.062 ↗
18. Cassie and Wenzel:Were they really sp wrong?10.1021/la7011167 ↗
19. Beyond Wenzel and Cassie–Baxter: Second-order effects on the wetting of rough surfaces10.1021/la502143v ↗
20. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces on engineering material surfaces with stearic acid10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.08.039 ↗
21. Bulk superhydrophobic materials: a facile and efficient approach to access superhydrophobicity by silane and urethane chemistries10.1039/C4TA03127J ↗