journal article·2024-11Open access

Why the adhesion strength is not enough to assess ice adhesion on surfaces

Luca Stendardo, Giulia Gastaldo, Marc Budinger, Irene Tagliaro, Valérie Pommier-Budinger, Carlo Antonini

Abstract

The interest in the development of icephobic surfaces has pushed towards the definition of standardized processes and parameters to assess ice adhesion, with the ambition of identifying an equivalent method to contact angle measurements used to assess wetting properties. Although most studies focus on the average ice adhesion strength, measured as the force per unit area required to detach ice, much less attention is paid to interfacial toughness, perhaps as its measurement is challenging. In this article, we provide a conceptual framework to correctly measure both ice adhesion strength and interfacial toughness, even using a simple push test method, laying the ground for a complete and comprehensive assessment of surface icephobicity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Icing and De-icing Technologies · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. A critical review of the measurement of ice adhesion to solid substrates10.1016/j.paerosci.2018.03.001 ↗
2. A. Amirfazli and C. Antonini, Fundamentals of Anti-Icing Surfaces, in Non-Wettable Surfaces: Theory, Preparation, and Applications (The Royal Society of Chemistry, 2017).10.1039/9781782623953-00319 ↗
3. On the Development of Icephobic Surfaces: Bridging Experiments and Simulations
4. The need for standards in low ice adhesion surface research: a critical review10.1080/01694243.2019.1679523 ↗
5. Investigation of the adhesive properties of the ice-aluminum interface10.2514/1.C032509 ↗
6. M. Schulz and M. Sinapius, Evaluation of Different Ice Adhesion Tests for Mechanical Deicing Systems, in (2015), pp. 2015-01–2135.10.4271/2015-01-2135 ↗
7. Reframing ice adhesion mechanisms on a solid surface10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158462 ↗
8. Initiation of edge debonding: coupled criterion versus cohesive zone model10.1007/s10704-016-0101-2 ↗
9. Low-interfacial toughness materials for effective large-scale deicing10.1126/science.aav1266 ↗
10. G. Gastaldo, V. Palanque, M. Budinger, V. Pommier-Budinger. Stress and Energy Release Rate Influence on Ice Shedding with Resonant Electro-Mechanical De-Icing Systems, in (Stockholm, Sweden, 2022).
11. Strength or toughness? a criterion for crack onset at a notch10.1016/S0997-7538(01)01184-6 ↗
12. Effect of cassie-baxter versus wenzel states on ice adhesion: a fracture toughness approach10.1016/j.coldregions.2021.103440 ↗
13. Quasicrystalline coatings exhibit durable low interfacial toughness with ice10.1021/acsami.1c08740 ↗
14. Cohesive strength and fracture toughness of atmospheric ice10.1016/j.coldregions.2022.103679 ↗
15. V. Palanque, Design of Low Consumption Electro-Mechanical de-Icing Systems, Engineering Sciences [physics], Université de Toulouse; ISAE-Supaero, 2022.
16. Full instantaneous de-icing using extensional modes: the role of architectured and multilayered materials in modes decoupling10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107264 ↗
17. Cohesive models for damage evolution in laminated composites10.1007/s10704-005-4729-6 ↗
18. Smart low interfacial toughness coatings for on-demand de-icing without melting10.1038/s41467-022-32852-6 ↗
19. Icephobic gradient polymer coatings deposited via iCVD: a novel approach for icing control and mitigation10.1021/acsami.3c18630 ↗
21. Wet pavement anti-icing — a physical mechanism10.1016/j.coldregions.2013.09.002 ↗
22. Round-robin study for ice adhesion tests10.3390/aerospace11020106 ↗
23. L. Stendardo, G. Gastaldo, M. Budinger, C. Antonini, V. Pommier-Budinger, and A. C. Ospina Patiño, Dynamic and Static Test Methods: Quantifying the Shear Strength at the Interface of Iced Substrates, in (Vienna, Austria, 2023), pp. 2023-01–1451.10.4271/2023-01-1451 ↗
24. Dimensional analysis and surrogate models for the thermal modeling of multiphysics systems10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.117 ↗
25. Taylor · Dimens. Anal. Eng. · 1974
26. On physically similar systems; illustrations of the use of dimensional equations10.1103/PhysRev.4.345 ↗
27. A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks10.1115/1.3601206 ↗
28. The J-Integral, https://www.fracturemechanics.org/j-integral.html.
29. Griffith theory of fracture10.1007/978-0-387-92897-5_259 ↗
30. Atmospheric ice adhesion on water-repellent coatings: wetting and surface topology effects10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b02725 ↗
31. Measurement of the fracture energy in mode I of atmospheric ice accreted on different materials using a blister test10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.02.003 ↗
32. A. Laroche, M. J. Grasso, A. Dolatabadi, and E. Bonaccurso, Tensile and Shear Test Methods for Quantifying the Ice Adhesion Strength to a Surface, in Ice Adhesion, edited by K. L. Mittal and C. ‐H. Choi, 1st ed. (Wiley, 2020), pp. 237–284.10.1002/9781119640523.ch9 ↗
33. The effect of cohesive-law parameters on mixed-mode fracture10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.06.006 ↗
34. Chitosan electrolyte hydrogel with low ice adhesion properties10.1016/j.colsurfa.2024.134695 ↗