Sputter yields of rough surfaces: Importance of the mean surface inclination angle from nano- to microscopic rough regimes
Source abstract
Abstract
The roughness of a surface is known to have a strong influence on the sputtering process. Commonly used 1D Monte Carlo codes for calculating sputter yields show good agreement with experimental data only for comparably flat surfaces, whereas local ion incidence angles, shadowing and redeposition influence the sputter yields in both magnitude and angular dependence on rough surfaces. In the present work, we therefore investigated tungsten samples of largely different roughness, characterised by atomic force and confocal microscopy. A highly sensitive quartz crystal microbalance was used to determine sputter yields during ion irradiation. Low ion fluences were applied to ensure that the surface morphology did not change during irradiation. The results were used to benchmark our new ray-tracing simulation code SPRAY, which can take microscopy images without limitations in size as input. SPRAY was furthermore applied to perform systematic simulations for artificially roughened and computer-generated surfaces. A clear result was that the governing parameter for description of the sputtering behaviour is the mean value of the surface inclination angle distribution, rather than the commonly used root mean square roughness. Our simulations show that this parameter is universally applicable for a wide range of different surface structures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Ion-surface interactions and analysis · Metal and Thin Film Mechanics · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. Layered WS2 thin films prepared by sulfurization of sputtered W films10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148719 ↗
2. Microstructures and properties of novel nanocomposite WNx coatings deposited by reactive magnetron sputtering10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.145508 ↗
3. Glancing angle deposited nanostructured film Fabry-Perot etalons for optical detection of ultrasound10.1364/OE.21.006391 ↗
4. The deposition and microstructure of amorphous tungsten oxide films by sputtering10.1016/j.vacuum.2015.01.020 ↗
5. An improved FIB sample preparation technique for site-specific plan-view specimens: A new cutting geometry10.1016/j.ultramic.2017.09.011 ↗
6. Self-organized nanopatterning of silicon surfaces by ion beam sputtering10.1016/j.mser.2014.09.001 ↗
7. Space weathering on airless bodies10.1002/2016JE005128 ↗
8. Sputtering of water ice films: A re-assessment with singly and doubly charged oxygen and argon ions, molecular oxygen, and electrons10.1016/j.icarus.2017.03.018 ↗
9. Solar wind Helium ion interaction with Mg and Fe rich pyroxene as Mercury surface analogue10.1016/j.nimb.2020.07.021 ↗
10. Experimental insights into space weathering of phobos: Laboratory investigation of sputtering by atomic and molecular planetary ions10.1029/2020JE006583 ↗
11. Plasma–wall interaction studies within the EUROfusion consortium: progress on plasma-facing components development and qualification10.1088/1741-4326/aa796e ↗
12. Erosion, screening, and migration of tungsten in the JET divertor10.1088/1741-4326/ab2aef ↗
13. Challenges for plasma-facing components in nuclear fusion10.1063/1.5090100 ↗
14. Roles of argon seeding in energy confinement and pedestal structure in JT-60U10.1088/0029-5515/55/3/033010 ↗
15. Development of advanced high heat flux and plasma-facing materials10.1088/1741-4326/aa6f71 ↗
16. Theory of sputtering. I. Sputtering yield of amorphous and polycrystalline targets
17. Behrisch · 2007
18. Ziegler · 2021
19. Tridyn-binary collision simulation of atomic collisions and dynamic composition changes in solids10.1016/0010-4655(88)90148-8 ↗
20. Mutzke · 2019
21. Absence of a crystal direction regime in which sputtering corresponds to amorphous material10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.225502 ↗
22. The influence of surface roughness on the angular dependence of the sputter yield10.1016/S0168-583X(98)00399-1 ↗
23. Sputtering properties of tungsten ’fuzzy’ surfaces10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.12.017 ↗
24. Fluence-dependent sputtering yield of micro-architectured materials10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.02.140 ↗
25. In situ plasma sputtering and angular distribution measurements for structured molybdenum surfaces10.1088/1361-6595/aa6a7d ↗
26. Angle-dependent sputter yield measurements of keV D ions on W and Fe and comparison with SDTrimSP and SDTrimSP-3D10.1016/j.nme.2018.12.007 ↗
27. Persistent sputtering yield reduction in plasma-infused foams10.1103/PhysRevLett.126.035001 ↗
28. Influence of surface roughness on the sputter yield of Mo under keV D ion irradiation10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153135 ↗
29. The effects of surface roughness characterized by fractal geometry on sputtering10.1016/0168-583X(90)90019-Q ↗
30. Simple model of surface roughness for binary collision sputtering simulations10.1016/j.nimb.2016.09.028 ↗
31. Sputtering of rough surfaces: A 3D simulation study10.1088/1402-4896/aa90be ↗
32. TRI3DYN - Collisional computer simulation of the dynamic evolution of 3-dimensional nanostructures under ion irradiation10.1016/j.nimb.2013.12.027 ↗
33. Sputtering of nanostructured tungsten and comparison to modelling with TRI3DYN10.1016/j.jnucmat.2020.152019 ↗
34. Surface roughness effect on mo physical sputtering and re-deposition in the linear plasma device PSI-2 predicted by ERO2.010.1016/j.nme.2019.02.006 ↗
35. Ion radiation albedo effect: Influence of surface roughness on ion implantation and sputtering of materials10.1088/1741-4326/57/1/016038 ↗
36. ERO2.0 modelling of the effects of surface roughness on molybdenum erosion and redeposition in the PSI-2 linear plasma device10.1088/1402-4896/ab5810 ↗
37. Surface roughness effects on plasma near a divertor plate and local impact angle10.1016/j.nme.2016.09.016 ↗
38. Fluence dependent changes of surface morphology and sputtering yield of iron: Comparison of experiments with SDTrimSP-2D10.1016/j.nimb.2018.06.004 ↗
39. The α-β inversion in quartz: A coherent phase transition under nonhydrostatic stress10.1029/JB074i020p04921 ↗
40. Atomic force microscope10.1103/PhysRevLett.56.930 ↗
41. Highly accurate non-contact characterization of engineering surfaces using confocal microscopy10.1088/0957-0233/9/7/023 ↗
42. Autodesk Inc. · 2021
43. Deposition of a nickel film by DC magnetron sputtering and its characterization10.1063/1.4732408 ↗
44. Ion beam analysis of fusion plasma-facing materials and components: facilities and research challenges10.1088/1741-4326/ab5817 ↗
45. Accurate high-resolution depth profiling of magnetron sputtered transition metal alloy films containing light species: A multi-method approach10.1016/j.tsf.2019.137416 ↗
46. Verwendung von Schwingquarzen zur Wägung dünner Schichten und zur Mikrowägung10.1007/BF01337937 ↗
47. A highly sensitive quartz-crystal microbalance for sputtering investigations in slow ion-surface collisions10.1063/1.1149979 ↗
48. A quartz-crystal-microbalance technique to investigate ion-induced erosion of fusion relevant surfaces10.1016/j.nimb.2008.10.088 ↗
49. A high temperature dual-mode quartz crystal microbalance technique for erosion and thermal desorption spectroscopy measurements10.1063/5.0012028 ↗
50. Sputtering measurements using a quartz crystal microbalance as a catcher10.1016/j.nimb.2016.11.039 ↗
51. Szabo · 2017
52. Schroeder · 2006
53. Kitware Inc. · 2021
54. Full three-dimensional simulation of focused ion beam micro/nanofabrication10.1088/0957-4484/18/24/245303 ↗
55. A linked-scale coupled model of mass erosion and redistribution in plasma-exposed micro-foam surfaces10.1016/j.jnucmat.2021.153010 ↗
56. Simulation of ion beam sputtering with SDTrimSP, TRIDYN and SRIM10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.03.152 ↗
57. Impact of surface morphology on sputtering during high-fluence plasma exposure10.1088/0031-8949/2014/T159/014040 ↗
58. Yamamura · 1983