Prediction of contact angle for hydrophobic surface fabricated with micro-machining based on minimum Gibbs free energy
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract When an interface exists between a liquid and a solid, the angle between the surface of the liquid and the outline of the contact surface is described as the contact angle. The size of the contact angle is the metrics of the hydrophobicity of the surface. The prediction of the contact angle has significant effect on the design of hydrophobic surface and improvement of hydrophobicity. In this paper, a prediction model for contact angle has been proposed based on minimum Gibbs free energy. It considers the effects of unilateral force and area constraints of the droplets. The effect of micro-structural parameters on contact angle has also been investigated. Micro-milling experiments have been conducted to fabricate the hydrophobic surface in order to validate the predictive capability of the contact angle model. Results revealed that the established prediction model could estimate the contact angle of hydrophobic surface. The contact angle could be increased by increasing concave width or reducing convex. The outcome of this research will lead to new methodologies for preparing hydrophobic surfaces with micro-machining technology.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Adhesion, Friction, and Surface Interactions · Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Shark-skin surfaces for fluid-drag reduction in turbulent flow: a review10.1098/rsta.2010.0201 ↗
2. Reversible switching between superhydrophilicity and superhydrophobicity10.1002/anie.200352565 ↗
3. No platelet can adhere—largely improved blood compatibility on nanostructured superhydrophobic surfaces10.1002/smll.200500095 ↗
4. Self-cleaning surfaces-virtual realities10.1038/nmat856 ↗
5. Characterization and distribution of water-repellent, self-cleaning plant surfaces10.1006/anbo.1997.0400 ↗
6. Wetting on hydrophobic rough surfaces: to be heterogeneous or not to be10.1021/la0344682 ↗
7. An essay on the cohesion of fluids10.1098/rstl.1805.0005 ↗
8. Resistance of solid surfaces to wetting by water10.1021/ie50320a024 ↗
9. Wettability of porous surfaces10.1039/tf9444000546 ↗
10. Effects of hydraulic pressure on the stability and transition of wetting modes of superhydrophobic surfaces10.1021/la052054y ↗
11. On the modeling of hydrophobic contact angles on rough surfaces10.1021/la026612+ ↗
12. R.E. Johnson, R.H. Dettre, Contact Angle, Wettability and Adhesion, Washington, DC, 1964.
13. Dynamic hydrophobicity of water droplets on the line-patterned hydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.susc.2006.04.044 ↗
14. Contact angle and impinging process of droplets on partially grooved hydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.03.071 ↗
15. Hydrophobic aluminum alloy surface fabricated by high speed micro-milling technology
16. The lowest surface free energy based on-CF3 alignment10.1021/la981727s ↗
17. Anisotropic wetting behavior arising from superhydrophobic surfaces: parallel grooved structure10.1021/jp712019y ↗
18. Analysis of the results of surface free energy measurement of Ti6Al4V by different methods10.1016/j.mspro.2015.04.130 ↗
19. A thermodynamic approach for determining the contact angle hysteresis for super-hydrophobic surfaces10.1016/j.jcis.2005.05.062 ↗
20. Droplet motion on designed micro textured super-hydrophobic surfaces with tunable wettability10.1021/la802033q ↗
21. Wetting behavior and drainage of water droplets on microgrooved brass surfaces10.1021/la302669g ↗
22. A comparison of different methods to calculate the surface free energy of wood using contact angle measurements10.1016/S0927-7757(00)00795-0 ↗