Density functional theory calculations on the adsorption of formaldehyde and other harmful gases on pure, Ti-doped, or N-doped graphene sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Understanding the interaction mechanisms of CO, NO, SO2, and HCHO with graphene are important in developing graphene-based sensors for gas detection and removal. In this study, the effects of doped Ti or N atom on the interaction of these gases with graphene were investigated by density functional theory calculations. Analyses of adsorption energy, electron density difference, and density of states indicated that the doped Ti atom could greatly improve the interaction of gas molecules with graphene. The Ti-doped graphene sheet demonstrated selective gas absorption. The order of interaction between the gas molecules and the Ti-doped graphene sheet was as follows: SO2 > NO > HCHO > CO. By contrast, the N-doped graphene sheet did not exhibit apparent selective gas absorption. These results imply that the Ti-doped graphene sheet is more effective than the N-doped graphene sheet in detecting and removing gas molecules because of its high selectivity.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors · Graphene research and applications · Transition Metal Oxide Nanomaterials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. Banerjee · Computational Materials Science · 2008 · 44 · 4110.1016/j.commatsci.2008.01.044 ↗
2. Basu · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · 2012 · 173 · 110.1016/j.snb.2012.07.092 ↗
3. Chen · Chinese Journal of Analytical Chemistry · 2012 · 40 · 177210.1016/S1872-2040(11)60583-5 ↗
4. Avramov · Chemical Physics Letters · 2011 · 508 · 8610.1016/j.cplett.2011.04.016 ↗
5. Gao · Applied Surface Science · 2011 · 257 · 744310.1016/j.apsusc.2011.02.135 ↗
6. Grande · Particuology · 2012 · 10 · 110.1016/j.partic.2011.12.001 ↗
7. Liao · Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports · 2010 · 70 · 35410.1016/j.mser.2010.07.003 ↗
8. Cole · Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology · 2010 · 58 · 16110.1016/j.yrtph.2010.08.013 ↗
9. Duong · Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research · 2011 · 728 · 11810.1016/j.mrrev.2011.07.003 ↗
10. Tunga · Chemical Reviews · 2010 · 110 · 253610.1021/cr800399g ↗
11. Bai · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 38 · 1403
12. Chen · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · 2012 · 39 · 12610.1016/j.jmgm.2012.11.009 ↗
13. Ma · Journal of Molecular Structure: Theochemistry · 2010 · 955 · 13410.1016/j.theochem.2010.06.007 ↗
14. Kang · Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2005 · 127 · 983910.1021/ja0509681 ↗
15. Sun · Solid State Communications · 2010 · 150 · 190610.1016/j.ssc.2010.07.037 ↗
16. Wang · Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical · 2009 · 136 · 39910.1016/j.snb.2008.12.056 ↗
17. Chu · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 36 · 1232410.1016/j.ijhydene.2011.07.015 ↗
18. Ao · Chemical Physics Letters · 2008 · 461 · 27610.1016/j.cplett.2008.07.039 ↗
19. Delley · Journal of Chemical Physics · 1990 · 92 · 50810.1063/1.458452 ↗
20. Delley · Journal of Chemical Physics · 2000 · 113 · 775610.1063/1.1316015 ↗
21. Delley · Physical Review B · 2002 · 66 · 15512510.1103/PhysRevB.66.155125 ↗
22. Monkhorst · Physical Review B · 1976 · 13 · 518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
23. Grimme · Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2006 · 27 · 178710.1002/jcc.20495 ↗
24. Jurecka · Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2007 · 28 · 55510.1002/jcc.20570 ↗
25. Ortmann · Physical Review B · 2006 · 73 · 20510110.1103/PhysRevB.73.205101 ↗