journal article·2026-05-06Open access

Research on Measuring Industrial Carbon Dioxide Emissions by Mobile Differential Absorption Lidar

Jinliang Zang, Liang Wu, Wanglong Shi, Hongjun Wang, Menghui Wu, Hong Lin

Applied Sciences· Volume 16· Issue 9

Abstract

Industrial activities represent the primary source of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, and accurate monitoring of industrial CO2 emissions is critical to mitigating greenhouse gas emissions. Due to the lack of quantifiable and direct measurement technologies, industrial CO2 emissions are typically calculated based on fuel combustion consumption and emission factors. However, the calculation method is not applicable to the quantification of fugitive emissions of CO2. This work demonstrates the capability of remotely measuring industrial CO2 emissions by mobile Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) system. The two-dimensional concentration distributions of the CO2 plume were remotely measured using DIAL system, and the CO2 emission rate was obtained with wind field information. The DIAL measurements were cross-validated using in-stack CEMS data and emission-factor calculations. Results show that the relative deviations of CO2 emission rates between DIAL and CEMS range from −5.83% to +2.57% across four tests, all within ±6%, and the coefficient of variation (CV) of 27 valid datasets is 7.24%. In contrast, the emission factor method yields consistently higher estimates, with relative deviations of +4.61% compared to DIAL measurements. Furthermore, the mobile DIAL system was deployed in three industrial scenarios with different emission intensities: a natural gas-fired industrial park, a photovoltaic glass manufacturing plant (low-emission steady-state), and a coal-fired power plant (high-emission dynamic), demonstrating its preliminary adaptability under different operating conditions. This study indicates the feasibility and potential reliability of the mobile DIAL system for high spatio-temporal resolution remote measurement of industrial CO2 emissions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics · Spectroscopy and Laser Applications · Odor and Emission Control Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Division of Thermophysics Metrology, National Institute of Metrology (China), Beijing 100029, China

Zhengzhou Institute of Metrology, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Technology Innovation Center of Carbon Metrology, State Administration for Market Regulation, Zhengzhou 450001, China

Fujian Institute of Metrology, Fuzhou 350003, China

Funding

National Key Technologies Research and Development Program of China · National Institute of Metrology, China

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2023). Climate Change 2021—The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009157896 ↗
2. Quantification of CO2 Emissions from Three Power Plants in China Using OCO-3 Satellite Measurements10.1007/s00376-024-3293-9 ↗
3. Liu, X., Liu, J., and Dou, C. (2025). Uncertainty Analysis of Provincial Carbon Emission Inventories: A Comparative Assessment of Emission Factors Sources. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17114787 ↗
4. Kim, C., Lee, J., Koh, M., and Son, S.-N. (2024). Analysis of Error Factors in Regional Ghg Estimation Based on Fuel Consumption: Focus on the Road Transport Sector. Proceedings of the 24th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM 2024, SWS Publisher.10.5593/sgem2024v/6.2/s26.31 ↗
5. Environmental Effects on NDIR-Based CH4 Monitoring: Characterization and Correction10.1021/acs.est.4c11110 ↗
6. Comparative Analysis of Continuous Automated Ambient Air Carbon Dioxide Monitoring Systems Based on Different Principles
7. Quantifying Methane Emissions from Anaerobic Digesters10.2166/wst.2019.415 ↗
8. Howes, N., Innocenti, F., Finlayson, A., Dimopoulos, C., Robinson, R., and Gardiner, T. (2023). Remote Measurements of Industrial CO2 Emissions Using a Ground-Based Differential Absorption Lidar in the 2 Μm Wavelength Region. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15225403 ↗
9. Parracino, S., Santoro, S., Fiorani, L., Nuvoli, M., Maio, G., and Aiuppa, A. (2020). The BrIdge voLcanic LIdar—BILLI: A Review of Data Collection and Processing Techniques in the Italian Most Hazardous Volcanic Areas. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10186402 ↗
10. Stroud, J.R., Dienstfrey, W.J., and Plusquellic, D.F. (2023). Study on Local Power Plant Emissions Using Multi-Frequency Differential Absorption LIDAR and Real-Time Plume Tracking. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15174283 ↗
11. CHARM-F—A New Airborne Integrated-Path Differential-Absorption Lidar for Carbon Dioxide and Methane Observations: Measurement Performance and Quantification of Strong Point Source Emissions10.1364/AO.56.005182 ↗
12. Yue, B., Yu, S., Li, M., Wei, T., Yuan, J., Zhang, Z., Dong, J., Jiang, Y., Yang, Y., and Gao, Z. (2022). Local-Scale Horizontal CO2 Flux Estimation Incorporating Differential Absorption Lidar and Coherent Doppler Wind Lidar. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14205150 ↗
13. Rossi, R., Di Giovanni, D., Malizia, A., and Gaudio, P. (2020). Measurements of Vehicle Pollutants in a High-Traffic Urban Area by a Multiwavelength Dial Approach: Correlation between Two Different Motor Vehicle Pollutants. Atmosphere, 11.10.3390/atmos11040383 ↗
14. Lan, L., Ghasemifard, H., Yuan, Y., Hachinger, S., Zhao, X., Bhattacharjee, S., Bi, X., Bai, Y., Menzel, A., and Chen, J. (2020). Assessment of Urban CO2 Measurement and Source Attribution in Munich Based on TDLAS-WMS and Trajectory Analysis. Atmosphere, 11.10.3390/atmos11010058 ↗
15. Han, G., Xu, H., Gong, W., Liu, J., Du, J., Ma, X., and Liang, A. (2018). Feasibility Study on Measuring Atmospheric CO2 in Urban Areas Using Spaceborne CO2-IPDA LIDAR. Remote Sens., 10.10.3390/rs10070985 ↗
16. Queißer, M., Burton, M., and Granieri, D. (2018). Large-Area Quantification of Subaerial CO2 Anomalies with Portable Laser Remote Sensing and 2D Tomography. Lead. Edge, 37.10.1190/tle37030222a1.1 ↗
17. High-Resolution Vertical Profiling and Source Apportionment of CO2 Using Coherent Differential Absorption Lidar in Coastal Urban Atmosphere10.1016/j.atmosres.2025.108556 ↗
18. Slant Detection and Error Analysis of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide Profile with a Continuous-Wave Differential Absorption Lidar10.1016/j.optlaseng.2024.108808 ↗
19. Spatiotemporal Detection of the Carbon Dioxide Using a Compact Differential Absorption LiDAR10.1002/mop.70184 ↗
20. Diode-Laser Based Field Deployable Continuous-Wave Differential Absorption Lidar for Atmospheric NO2 Monitoring10.1016/j.optlaseng.2024.108344 ↗
21. Investigation on Methane Emission Measurement by Differential Absorption Lidar
22. (2026, March 10). Lidar: Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere|Springer Nature Link. Available online: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/b106786.
23. Infrared Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) Measurements of Hydrocarbon Emissions10.1039/c0em00312c ↗
24. On the Application of Linear Regression to Surface-Layer Wind Profiles for Deducing Roughness Length and Friction Velocity10.1007/s10546-019-00479-8 ↗
25. The HITRAN2020 Molecular Spectroscopic Database10.1016/j.jqsrt.2021.107949 ↗
26. First Measurements of a Carbon Dioxide Plume from an Industrial Source Using a Ground Based Mobile Differential Absorption Lidar10.1039/C4EM00113C ↗
27. Aiuppa, A., Fiorani, L., Santoro, S., Parracino, S., D’Aleo, R., Liuzzo, M., Maio, G., and Nuvoli, M. (2017). New Advances in Dial-Lidar-Based Remote Sensing of the Volcanic CO2 Flux. Front. Earth Sci., 5.10.3389/feart.2017.00015 ↗
28. Innocenti, F., Gardiner, T., and Robinson, R. (2022). Uncertainty Assessment of Differential Absorption Lidar Measurements of Industrial Emissions Concentrations. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14174291 ↗