Parameter Sensitivity Analysis of Generators and Grid-Connected Constraints in Hybrid Microgrids Using Deep Reinforcement Learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Hybrid renewable energy systems, which combine photovoltaic panels, wind turbines, batteries, generators, and grid connections, require careful sizing to balance economic performance, renewable integration, and supply reliability. In this context, this study proposes a deep reinforcement learning (DRL)-based sensitivity analysis framework in which the admissible energy contributions from the diesel generator and the grid are treated as explicit design-control parameters. The objective is to simultaneously minimize the levelized cost of energy, minimize the loss of power supply probability, and maximize the renewable energy fraction. A sensitivity analysis was conducted across different HRES configurations, load profiles, and tau/gamma values. The performance of the DRL approach was compared with that of multi-objective particle swarm optimization and the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II under the same study setting. The results indicate that DRL can identify competitive trade-offs, especially under standard load conditions, while also providing insight into how admissible backup-energy constraints reshape techno-economic and reliability compromises. The best trade-offs were observed around intermediate tau and gamma values, suggesting that moderate backup-energy margins are more favorable than extreme values. These findings should be interpreted within the scope of a simulation-based study and provide comparative design-oriented evidence rather than universally transferable design rules.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems · Microgrid Control and Optimization · Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Systems Engineering Department, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre Dame W. St, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
Electrical Engineering Department, École de Technologie Supérieure, 1100 Notre Dame W. St, Montréal, QC H3C 1K3, Canada
Funding
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. Modeling, size optimization and sensitivity analysis of a remote hybrid renewable energy system10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.053 ↗
2. Size Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis of Hybrid Wind/PV Micro-Grids- A Case Study for Bangladesh10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2945937 ↗
3. Techno-economic analysis of both on-grid and off-grid hybrid energy system with sensitivity analysis for an educational institution10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114188 ↗
4. Prefeasibility Economic and Sensitivity Assessment of Hybrid Renewable Energy System10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3058517 ↗
5. Hasan, S.M.N., Ahmad, S., Liaf, A., Mustayen, A., Hasan, M., Ahmed, T., Howlader, S., Hassan, M., and Alam, M.R. (2024). Techno-Economic Performance and Sensitivity Analysis of an Off-Grid Renewable Energy-Based Hybrid System: A Case Study of Kuakata, Bangladesh. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17061476 ↗
6. Optimizing hybrid PV/Wind and grid systems for sustainable energy solutions at the university campus: Economic, environmental, and sensitivity analysis
7. Nallolla, C.A., and P, V. (2022). Optimal Design of a Hybrid Off-Grid Renewable Energy System Using Techno-Economic and Sensitivity Analysis for a Rural Remote Location. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142215393 ↗
8. Optimal design and sensitivity analysis of the stand-alone hybrid energy system with PV and biomass-CHP for remote villages10.1016/j.energy.2021.120323 ↗
9. Prefeasibility Techno-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy System10.1016/j.prime.2024.100443 ↗
10. Optimal Design and Performance Analysis of Hybrid Renewable Energy System for Ensuring Uninterrupted Power Supply During Load Shedding10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3349594 ↗
11. Deep reinforcement learning for optimal microgrid energy management with renewable energy and electric vehicle integration10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113180 ↗
12. Risk-aware energy management of a microgrid integrated with battery charging and swapping stations in the presence of renewable resources high penetration, crypto-currency miners and responsive loads10.1016/j.energy.2022.125719 ↗
13. Energy management of a microgrid considering nonlinear losses in batteries through Deep Reinforcement Learning10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.123435 ↗
14. Pei, Y., Yao, Y., Zhao, J., Ding, F., and Wang, J. (2024, January 21–25). Deep Reinforcement Learning for Microgrid Cost Optimization Considering Load Flexibility. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), Seattle, WA, USA.10.1109/PESGM51994.2024.10688837 ↗
15. Chen, S., Liu, J., Cui, Z., Chen, Z., Wang, H., and Xiao, W. (2024). A Deep Reinforcement Learning Approach for Microgrid Energy Transmission Dispatching. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14093682 ↗
16. Blenk, T., and Weindl, C. (2024). Development of Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of Electrical Energy Networks and Systems within State Space. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17174489 ↗
17. Analytical Computation of the Sensitivity Coefficients in Hybrid AC/DC Networks10.1109/TSG.2024.3404552 ↗
18. Deep reinforcement learning approach for hybrid renewable energy systems optimization10.1016/j.engappai.2025.111650 ↗
19. Socio-techno-economic-environmental sizing of hybrid renewable energy system using metaheuristic optimization approaches10.1002/ep.14386 ↗
20. Design optimization of off-grid Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems considering the effects of building energy performance and climate change: Case study of Algeria10.1016/j.energy.2020.119605 ↗
21. Legrene, I., Wong, T., and Dessaint, L.A. (2024, January 24–26). Practical Cost Effectiveness Analysis for Solar Energy Systems: Case Study of Stand-Alone Retail Building. Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Compatibility, Power Electronics and Power Engineering (CPE-POWERENG), Gdynia, Poland.10.1109/CPE-POWERENG60842.2024.10604314 ↗
22. Lowering the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) for mass-adjustable-buoy-based wave energy converters10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.118878 ↗
23. Sizing and energy management of grid-connected hybrid renewable energy systems based on techno-economic predictive technique10.1016/j.renene.2024.120639 ↗
24. Probabilistic Loss Sensitivity Analysis in Power Distribution Systems10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3186349 ↗
25. Levelised cost of energy—A theoretical justification and critical assessment10.1016/j.enpol.2018.10.004 ↗
26. Clarifications of and improvements to the equations used to calculate the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), and comments on the weighted average cost of capital (WACC)10.1016/j.energy.2020.118340 ↗
27. Statistical Characterization for Loss Distributions of Power Semiconductor Devices10.1109/TPEL.2020.3045033 ↗
28. Development of Mathematical Model for Determining The Relative Power Loss of Power Transmission Lines10.56947/jmer.v2i1.7 ↗
29. Multi-criteria PSO-based optimal design of grid-connected hybrid renewable energy systems10.1080/15435075.2020.1779072 ↗
30. Multi-objective optimization of a hybrid renewable energy system supplying a residential building using NSGA-II and MOPSO algorithms10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117515 ↗
31. Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning10.1038/nature14236 ↗
32. Reliability Support of Undependable Grid Using Green Energy Systems: Economic Study10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3048487 ↗
33. A multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm based on two-archive mechanism10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108532 ↗
34. Multi-objective particle swarm optimization with dynamic population size
35. A multi-objective particle swarm for constraint and unconstrained problems10.1007/s00521-020-05555-6 ↗
36. An enhanced fast non-dominated solution sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective problems10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.052 ↗
37. Optimization problems in water distribution systems using Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II: An overview10.1016/j.asej.2022.101932 ↗
38. Operative generative design using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II)10.1016/j.autcon.2023.105026 ↗
39. Inverse analysis of geotechnical parameters using an improved version of non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106416 ↗
40. Multi-objective optimization of the environmental-economic dispatch with reinforcement learning based on non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2018.10.020 ↗
41. Wang, Q., Wang, L., Huang, W.S., Wang, Z., Liu, S., and Savić, D. (2019). Parameterization of NSGA-II for the Optimal Design of Water Distribution Systems. Water, 11.10.3390/w11050971 ↗
42. NSGA-II parameterization for the optimal pressure sensor location in water distribution networks10.1080/1573062X.2023.2209553 ↗