journal article·2025-10-14Open access

Methodological Framework for Semiconductor Fab Design Using Dynamo-Based Generative Design

Yeongyu Hwang, WonSeok Choi, Minhyuk Jung, Wonho Cho, Jaewook Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 20

Abstract

The rapid growth of the semiconductor industry has created a bottleneck in which traditional manual methods for designing fabrication plants (fabs) cannot keep pace with their high complexity and short technological lifecycles. This problem stems from the critical mismatch between a fab’s multiyear construction timeline and the rapidly shrinking lifecycle of the advanced chips it is built to produce. To address this challenge, the present study proposes a methodological framework that uses dynamic generative design within a Building Information Modelling (BIM) environment. This approach applies algorithms to generalized models to generate and evaluate numerous potential design solutions automatically. For facility layouts, the framework produces plans that balance spatial efficiency, material flow, and stringent cleanroom protocols. For complex utility systems, it moves beyond simple clash detection to proactively generate resource-efficient, clash-free routing paths that consider both constructability and long-term maintainability. The primary contribution of this study is a standardized, data-agnostic design process that enhances design quality without requiring sensitive project data, establishing a robust foundation for future Digital Twin integration.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Design Education and Practice · Product Development and Customization · Manufacturing Process and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Construction Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Pyeongtaek 17786, Republic of Korea

Division of Architecture, Gachon University, Seongnam 13120, Republic of Korea

Funding

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. The construction of production performance prediction system for semiconductor manufacturing with artificial neural networks10.1080/002075499191319 ↗
2. From BIM to extended reality in AEC industry10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103254 ↗
3. Yang, Y. (2023). Symmetry in Safety and Disaster Prevention Engineering. Symmetry, 15.10.3390/sym15122101 ↗
4. Limits to modularity: Reflections on recent developments in chip design10.1080/13662710500195918 ↗
5. Miller, C. (2022). Chip War: The Fight for the World’s Most Critical Technology, Simon and Schuster.
6. Lee, J., Cho, W., Kang, D., and Lee, J. (2023). Simplified methods for generative design that combine evaluation techniques for automated conceptual building design. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132312856 ↗
7. BIM-based graph data model for automatic generative design of modular buildings10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104062 ↗
8. Optimizing MEP design in early AEC projects through generative design10.1016/j.autcon.2024.105566 ↗
9. Manzoor, B., Othman, I., and Pomares, J.C. (2021). Digital technologies in the architecture, engineering and construction (Aec) industry—A bibliometric—Qualitative literature review of research activities. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18116135 ↗
10. Frameworks for innovation, collaboration, and change: Value creation wheel, design thinking, creative problem-solving, and lean10.1002/jsc.2321 ↗
11. Building automation system-BIM integration using a linked data structure10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103257 ↗
12. Computational design in architecture: Defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design10.1016/j.foar.2019.12.008 ↗
13. A practical generative design method10.1016/j.cad.2010.09.009 ↗
14. Lee, J., Lee, Y., Park, S., and Hong, C. (2023). Implementing a digital twin of an underground utility tunnel for geospatial feature extraction using a multimodal image sensor. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13169137 ↗
15. Performance-based design: Current practices and research issues
16. Multi-objective optimization using genetic algorithms: A tutorial10.1016/j.ress.2005.11.018 ↗
17. Santos, A.F., Gaspar, P.D., and Souza, H.J.d. (2020). New Data Center Performance Index: Perfect Design Data Center—PDD. Climate, 8.10.3390/cli8100110 ↗
18. BIM-based determination of indoor navigation sign layout using hybrid simulation and optimization10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104243 ↗
19. Machine learning for generative architectural design: Advancements, opportunities, and challenges10.1016/j.autcon.2025.106129 ↗
20. Optimizing daylight, energy and occupant comfort performance of classrooms with photovoltaic integrated vertical shading devices
21. Component-based machine learning for performance prediction in building design10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.011 ↗
22. Lee, J., Boubekri, M., and Liang, F. (2019). Impact of building design parameters on daylighting metrics using an analysis, prediction, and optimization approach based on statistical learning technique. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11051474 ↗
23. Building information modeling-based integration of MEP layout designs and constructability10.1016/j.autcon.2015.10.003 ↗
24. Sezdi, M., and Üzcan, Y. (2016, January 27–29). Clean room classification in the operating room. Proceedings of the 2016 Medical Technologies National Congress (TIPTEKNO), Antalya, Turkey.10.1109/TIPTEKNO.2016.7863107 ↗
25. Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): Precepts, models, and opportunities for research in construction10.1016/j.aei.2023.102024 ↗
26. (2015). Cleanrooms and associated controlled environments — Part 1: Classification of air cleanliness by particle concentration (Standard No. ISO 14644-1:2015).