Penumbra Shadow Representation in Photovoltaics: Comparing Dynamic and Constant Intensity
Source abstract
Abstract
This study is the first to directly compare natural dynamic penumbra shadows with experimentally replicated constant-intensity shadows on photovoltaic modules, providing new insights into the limitations of conventional shadow approximations found in the existing body of knowledge. Neutral density filters were deemed the most appropriate method for replicating a constant-intensity shadow, as they reduce visible light relatively uniformly across the primary silicon wavelength range. Preliminary experiments established the intensity values for each neutral density filter chosen to be able to match with the 29 dynamic penumbra shadows being replicated by both the size of shadow and the averaged intensity. The results revealed that while constant-intensity shadows and dynamic penumbra shadows produced similar overall power loss magnitudes, the constant-intensity shadows consistently led to higher losses, averaging 9.65% more, despite having the same average intensity and shadow size. Regression modelling showed similar curvature trends for both shading types (Adjusted R2 = 0.895 for constant-intensity shadows and Adjusted R2 = 0.743 for dynamic-intensity shadows), but statistical analyses, including the Mann–Whitney U-test (p = 0.00229), confirmed a significant difference between the power loss output for the two penumbra shadow conditions. Consequently, the null hypothesis was rejected, confirming that the simplified constant-intensity shadows represented in the literature cannot accurately replicate the behaviour of dynamic-intensity penumbra on photovoltaic modules.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics · Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute for Sustainable Energy, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis of the Hard and Soft Shading Impact on Photovoltaic Module Performance Using Solar Module Tester
2. Theoretical and experimental analysis of photovoltaic module characteristics under different partial shading conditions10.11591/ijpeds.v11.i3.pp1508-1518 ↗
3. Teneta, J., Kreft, W., and Janowski, M. (2024). Partial Shading of Photovoltaic Modules with Thin Linear Objects: Modelling in MATLAB Environment and Measurement Experiments. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17143546 ↗
4. Experimental investigation of partial shading scenarios on pv (photovoltaic) modules10.1016/j.energy.2013.04.009 ↗
5. Outdoor characterization and comparison of string and mlpe under clear and partially shaded conditions10.1002/ese3.97 ↗
6. Photovoltaic hotspots: A mitigation technique and its thermal cycle10.1016/j.ijleo.2024.171627 ↗
7. Hot Spot Analysis of Photovoltaic Module under Partial Shading Conditions by Using IR-Imaging Technology10.30684/etj.v39i9.841 ↗
8. Improved MPPT Algorithm for Controlling a PV System Grid Connected for Rapid Changes of Irradiance
9. Shankar, N., and SaravanaKumar, N. (2020). Reduced Partial shading effect in Multiple PV Array configuration model using MPPT based Enhanced Particle Swarm Optimization Technique. Microprocess. Microsyst., 103287.10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103287 ↗
10. Analysis of the Effects of Hard Shading Pattern on I–V Performance Curve10.3103/S0003701X23700020 ↗
11. Klugmann-Radziemska, E. (2020). Shading, Dusting and Incorrect Positioning of Photovoltaic Modules as Important Factors in Performance Reduction. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13081992 ↗
12. Liu, Z., Huang, K., Tan, T., and Wang, L. (2006, January 20–24). Cast Shadow Removal with GMM for Surface Reflectance Component. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR’06), Hong Kong, China.
13. Calculation of the shadow-penumbra relation and its application on efficient architectural design10.1016/j.solener.2014.08.043 ↗
14. Luo, C., Wu, Y., Su, X., Zou, W., Yu, Y., Jiang, Q., and Xu, L. (2023). Influence and characteristic of shading on photovoltaic performance of bifacial modules and method for estimating bifacial gain. Building Simulation, Tsinghua University Press.10.1007/s12273-022-0966-0 ↗
15. Bae, J., Jee, H., Park, Y., and Lee, J. (2021). Simulation-Based Shading Loss Analysis of a Shingled String for High-Density Photovoltaic Modules. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311257 ↗
16. Solar Photovoltaic system under partial shading and perspectives on maximum utilization of the shaded land10.1080/15435075.2022.2047977 ↗
17. Maximum power point tracking of the solar power plants in shadow mode through artificial neural network10.1007/s40747-019-0096-1 ↗
18. Gutiérrez Galeano, A., Bressan, M., Jiménez Vargas, F., and Alonso, C. (2018). Shading Ratio Impact on Photovoltaic Modules and Correlation with Shading Patterns. Energies, 11.10.3390/en11040852 ↗
19. Shadow Detection and Reconstruction of High-Resolution Remote Sensing Images in Mountainous and Hilly Environments10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3338976 ↗
20. A Survey on Shadow Detection Techniques in a Single Image
21. Dendrinos, D. (2025, February 05). On the Fuzzy Nature of Shadows. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Dimitrios-Dendrinos/publication/317433717_ON_THE_FUZZY_NATURE_OF_SHADOWS/links/593aa58ba6fdcc17a9898705/ON-THE-FUZZY-NATURE-OF-SHADOWS.pdf.
22. (2025, January 07). Geometrical Optics Laboratory. Available online: https://www.animations.physics.unsw.edu.au/labs/geometrical-optics/geometrical-optics-lab.html.
23. Ikeuchi, K. (2014). Penumbra and Umbra. Computer Vision: A Reference Guide, Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-31439-6 ↗
24. Axisa, M., Demicoli, M., and Mule’Stagno, L. (2024). Analysing the Effects of Thin Object Shading on PV Sources: A Dual Approach Combining Outdoor and Laboratory Solar Simulator Experimentation. Energies, 17.10.3390/en17092069 ↗
25. Quantifying the effect of shadow formation on photovoltaic sources under thin object shading: An image analysis approach10.1051/epjpv/2025005 ↗
26. Axisa, M., Mule’Stagno, L., and Demicoli, M. (2024, January 23–27). Correlating field experimentation and image analysis for the assessment of induced losses from thin object shading on photovoltaic sources. Proceedings of the EU PVSEC 2024, Vienna, Austria.
27. De Rosa, A., Bortot, A., and Bergamo, F. (2023). Praise of Penumbra, John Wiley & Sons.
28. The Role of Light and Shadow in the Perception of Photographs
29. Serrano, M.-A., and Moreno, J.C. (2020). Spectral transmission of solar radiation by plastic and glass materials. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B, 208.10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111894 ↗
30. The role of glass as a barrier against the transmission of ultraviolet radiation: An experimental study10.1111/j.1600-0781.2009.00434.x ↗
31. UV degradation of the optical properties of acrylic for neutrino and dark matter experiments10.1088/1748-0221/4/09/T09001 ↗
32. Assessing the proper color of translucent materials by an extended two-flux model from measurements based on an integrating sphere10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.8.MAAP-291 ↗
33. Different types of Optical Filters and their Realistic Application
34. Lam, E.Y., and Fung, G.S.K. (2008). Automatic white balancing in digital photography. Single-Sensor Imaging: Methods and Applications for Digital Cameras, CRC Press.10.1201/9781420054538.ch10 ↗
35. The Pulfrich phenomenon and its alleviation with a neutral density filter10.1136/bjo.73.12.1004 ↗
36. Murakami Color Research Laboratory (2025, January 18). ND Filter. Available online: https://www.mcrl.co.jp/english/products/p_standard/detail/NDfilters.html.
37. Kase Filters (2025, January 15). Using Graduated ND Filters. Available online: https://kasefilters.eu/nice-to-know/guides/using-graduated-nd-filters/.
38. Designing Metallic Neutral Density Filters with Constant Optical Density Versus Wavelength10.33140/SSJ.01.02.08 ↗
39. Photovoltaic-thermal (PVT) technology: Review and case study10.1088/1755-1315/354/1/012048 ↗
40. Guenther, R.D. (2005). OPTICAL MATERIALS|Color Filter and Absorption Glasses. Encyclopedia of Modern Optics, Elsevier.
41. Correction Procedures for Temperature and Irradiance of Photovoltaic Modules: Determination of Series Resistance and Temperature Coefficients by Means of an Indoor Solar Flash Test Device
42. (2020). Part 1: Measurement of Photovoltaic Current-Voltage Characteristics (Standard No. IEC 60904-1:2020).
43. (2025, May 08). Understanding Neutral Density Filters|Edmund Optics. Available online: https://www.edmundoptics.com/knowledge-center/application-notes/optics/understanding-neutral-density-filters/?srsltid=AfmBOorwBdA2g5zdwLEDddyzul6popAOdCHe_N_jGyJezKwTqgpO72Dj.
44. A comprehensive study on partial shading response of c-Si modules and yield modeling of string inverter and module level power electronics10.1016/j.solener.2016.06.050 ↗
45. An unsupervised method for identifying local PV shading based on AC power and regional irradiance data10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.007 ↗
46. Khobragade, K. (2012). A Comparative study of Converting Coloured Image to Gray-scale Image using Different Technologies. [Master’s Thesis, Fergusson College].
47. Review of gamma correction techniques in digital imaging
48. Singnoo, J., and Finlayson, G. (2010, January 8–12). Understanding the Gamma Adjustment of Images. Proceedings of the Color and Imaging Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA.
49. Carlos, J., and Fernandes, J.C. (August, January 29). Linear versus Non-Linear Digital Image Processing Methods. Proceedings of the Congresso Luso-Moçambicano de Engenharia, Maputo, Moçambique.
50. Blind inverse gamma correction10.1109/83.951529 ↗
51. Implementation of Curve Fitting using Polynomial Regression in Python
52. Ayyub, B., and Mccuen, R. (2015). Curve Fitting and Regression Analysis. Numerical Analysis for Engineers, CRC.10.1201/b19115 ↗
53. Rezagholizadeh, M., and Clark, J. (2014, January 3–7). Image Sensor Modeling: Color Measurement at Low Light Levels. Proceedings of the Color and Imaging Conference, Boston, MA, USA.10.2352/J.ImagingSci.Technol.2014.58.3.030401 ↗
54. Simple Regression Models: A Comparison using Criteria Measures
55. Best practice in statistics: Use the Welch t-test when testing the difference between two groups10.1177/0004563221992088 ↗
56. Statistical Analysis of the Median Test and the Mann-Whitney U Test
57. A New Nonlinear Model-Based Fault Detection Method Using Mann–Whitney Test10.1109/TIE.2019.2958297 ↗
58. Using Effect Size—Or Why the P Value Is Not Enough10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1 ↗
59. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: A practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front. Psychol., 4.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 ↗
60. Design and simulation of 20MW photovoltaic power plant using PVSyst
61. Chedid, R., Tajeddine, R., Chaaban, F., and Ghajar, R. (2014, January 13–16). Modeling and simulation of PV arrays under varying conditions. Proceedings of the MELECON 2014-2014 17th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, Beirut, Lebanon.10.1109/MELCON.2014.6820592 ↗
62. Rooftop solar PV system planning with 3D visualization using PVSOL (Case study in Syria)