journal article·2022-08-10Open access

Maximizing the Productivity of Photolithography Equipment by Machine Learning Based on Time Analytics

Juyoung Jung, Jin-Hwan Hong, Jeewoong Suk, Hyunsoon Park, Byoungdeog Choi

Applied Sciences· Volume 12· Issue 16

Abstract

Maximizing productivity is one of the most critical factors for competitiveness in the manufacturing industry. Needless to say, the semiconductor industry, in which the automation rate is relatively high and the manufacturing process continues 24 h a day, requires high productivity to be maintained. This paper is about a model that analyzes the cause of an increase in time needed for the whole photolithography process and automatically classifies it in real-time by machine learning. The time analytics model based on a k-means algorithm divides the processing time into four hundred detailed time steps and classifies causes through normalizing and clustering processes. Further, true/false measures of performance were employed based on the confusion matrix. To increase the accuracy of the model, the classified cause becomes a source for creating a new algorithm that can detect problems quickly and accurately. A small number of wafers that the system has failed to classify has accumulated in the database to increase the frequency of occurrence. As a result of evaluating the time analytics model in the photolithography extreme ultraviolet (EUV) equipment, the model has classified 98.6% of the wafers that exceed the limitation. Continuous updates of new phenomena that will be generated from advanced technologies will be more important than the current classification ability. We are accumulating unclassified data for a sustainable system and will continue to classify by synthesizing new phenomena. Data classified in real-time with high accuracy become a steppingstone for maintaining high productivity. Production equipment and processes are developed to enhance individual characteristics. Nevertheless, a data mining method that divides the process time can also be widely used in manufacturing processes of other fields.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection · Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 1, Samsungjeonja-ro, Hwaseong-si 18448, Korea

Department of Semiconductor and Display Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si 16419, Korea

SKKU Advanced Institute of Nanotechnology (SAINT), Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si 16419, Korea

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon-si 16419, Korea

Funding

Samsung Electronics Co., LTD · SungKyunKwan University · Ministry of Education · National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. Nakajima, S. (1988). Introduction to TPM: Total Productive Maintenance (Translation), Productivity Press.
2. Performance measurement based on a total quality approach10.1108/17410401111140419 ↗
3. Overall material usage effectiveness (OME): A structured indicator to measure the effective material usage within manufacturing processes10.1080/09537287.2017.1395920 ↗
4. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek, M., and Piechowski, M. (2016, January 13–14). Practical aspects of OEE in automotive company—Case study. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation, Guilin, China.10.2991/msmi-16.2016.51 ↗
5. Performance measurement using overall equipment effectiveness (OEE): Literature review and practical application discussion10.1080/00207540601142645 ↗
6. An integrated OEE framework for structured productivity improvement in a semiconductor manufacturing facility10.1108/IJPPM-04-2019-0176 ↗
7. Prasetyo, Y.T., and Veroya, F.C. (2020, January 16–21). An Application of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) for Minimizing the Bottleneck Process in Semiconductor Industry. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 7th International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Applications (ICIEA), Bangkok, Thailand.10.1109/ICIEA49774.2020.9101925 ↗
8. Overall equipment effectiveness as a measure of operational improvement—A practical analysis10.1108/01443570010355750 ↗
9. Wafer map defect pattern classification and image retrieval using convolutional neural network10.1109/TSM.2018.2795466 ↗
10. Machine learning-based novelty detection for faulty wafer detection in semiconductor manufacturing10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.088 ↗
11. Pattern Classification for Small-Sized Defects Using Multi-Head CNN in Semiconductor Manufacturing10.1007/s12541-021-00566-2 ↗
12. Estimating the reliability of virtual metrology predictions in semiconductor manufacturing: A novelty detection-based approach
13. Genetic K-means algorithm10.1109/3477.764879 ↗
14. A clustering method based on K-means algorithm10.1016/j.phpro.2012.03.206 ↗
15. Unsupervised K-means clustering algorithm10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988796 ↗
16. Ran, X., Zhou, X., Lei, M., Tepsan, W., and Deng, W. (2021). A novel k-means clustering algorithm with a noise algorithm for capturing urban hotspots. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112311202 ↗
17. Oakland, J.S. (2007). Statistical Process Control, Routledge.10.4324/9780080551739 ↗
18. A review on evaluation metrics for data classification evaluations10.5121/ijdkp.2015.5201 ↗
19. Fatourechi, M., Ward, R.K., Mason, S.G., Huggins, J., Schlögl, A., and Birch, G.E. (2008, January 11–13). Comparison of evaluation metrics in classification applications with imbalanced datasets. Proceedings of the 2008 Seventh International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/ICMLA.2008.34 ↗