Data Processing and Sample Size Determination Approaches to Developing South Korea’s Destruction and Removal Efficiencies of the Semiconductor and Display Industry
Source abstract
Abstract
Aiming to serve as a preliminary study for South Korea’s national GHG emission factor development, this study reviewed data treatment and sample size determination approaches to establishing the destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) of the semiconductor and display industry. We used field-measured DRE data to identify the optimal sample size that can secure representativeness by employing the coefficient of variation and stratified sampling. Although outlier removal is often a key process in the development of field-based coefficients, it has been underexplored how different outlier treatment options could be useful when data availability is limited. In our analysis, three possible outlier treatment cases were considered: no treatment (using data with outliers as they are) (Case 1), outlier removal (Case 2), and adjustment of outliers to extreme values (Case 3). The results of the sample size calculation showed that a minimum of 17 and a maximum of 337 data (out of a total of 2968 scrubbers) were required for determining a CF4 gas factor and that a minimum of 3 and a maximum of 45 data (out of a total of 2917 scrubbers) were required for determining a CHF3 gas factor. Our findings suggest that (a) outlier treatment can be useful when the coefficient of variation lacks information from relevant data, and (b) the CV method with outlier adjustment (Case 3) can provide the closest result to the sample size resulting from the stratified sampling method with relevant characteristics considered.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Technology Assessment and Management · Vehicle emissions and performance
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The Seoul Institute, Seoul 05756, Republic of Korea
Department of Climate and Environment, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
Department of Climate and Energy, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
Department of Statistics, Duksung Women’s University, Seoul 01369, Republic of Korea
Funding
Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE)
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. (2023, April 19). 2050CNC (Presidential Commission on Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth) Home Page. First National Carbon Neutrality and Green Growth Basic Plan (Government Draft). Available online: https://www.2050cnc.go.kr/base/board/read?boardManagementNo=3&boardNo=1397&searchCategory=&page=1&searchType=&searchWord=&menuLevel=2&menuNo=17.
2. GIR (Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Center) (2023). 2022 National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report (2023).
3. (2023, April 17). MOTIE (Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy) Home Page. The Launch Ceremony of Semiconductor and Display Carbon Neutrality Committee. Available online: http://www.motie.go.kr/motie/ne/presse/press2/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_cd_n=81&bbs_seq_n=163883.
4. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006). 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories.
5. MOE (Ministry of Environment) (2020). Guidelines for Developing Site-Specific Emission Factors (2020).
6. MOE (Ministry of Environment) (2021). Guidelines for Developing Site-Specific Emission Factors (2021).
7. Sample size calculation10.4103/0974-7788.59946 ↗
8. Power Analysis, Sample Size, and Assessment of Statistical Assumptions—Improving the Evidential Value of Lighting Research
9. Grundler, A., Dazer, M., and Herzig, T. (2022). Statistical Power Analysis in Reliability Demonstration Testing: The Probability of Test Success. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12126190 ↗
10. Vozzi, A., Ronca, V., Aricò, P., Borghini, G., Sciaraffa, N., Cherubino, P., Trettel, A., Babiloni, F., and Di Flumeri, G. (2021). The Sample Size Matters: To What Extent the Participant Reduction Affects the Outcomes of a Neuroscientific Research. A Case-Study in Neuromarketing Field. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21186088 ↗
11. Serdar, C.C., Cihan, M., Yücel, D., and Serdar, M.A. (2021). Sample size, power and effect size revisited: Simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem. Med., 31.10.11613/BM.2021.010502 ↗
12. Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations10.1016/j.destud.2021.101077 ↗
13. Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y ↗
14. Probability Sampling Designs: Principles for Choice of Design and Balancing
15. Sampling in epidemiological research: Issues, hazards and pitfalls10.1192/pb.bp.114.050203 ↗
16. Understanding and misunderstanding randomized controlled trials10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.12.005 ↗
17. Jeffrey, W. (2001). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data, The MIT Press.
18. The Use of Cluster Analysis for Stratification
19. Best Probability Density Function for Random Sampled Data10.3390/e11041001 ↗
20. Nalli, G., Amendola, D., Perali, A., and Mostarda, L. (2021). Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms and Moodle Plugin for Creation of Student Heterogeneous Groups in Online University Courses. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11135800 ↗
21. Yang, H. (2022). Detection of Process Change Using Statistical Test of Extracted Independent Variables and Mahalonobis Distance. [M.D. Thesis, The Ajou University].
22. Generalizing systematic adaptive cluster sampling for forest ecosystem inventory10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119051 ↗
23. KEA (Korea Energy Agency) (2015). Guidelines for Calculating Energy Savings for M&V Guidelines for Calculating Energy Savings (2015).
24. Monitoring the coefficient of variation using a double-sampling control chart10.1080/03610918.2021.1971242 ↗
25. Hans, S. (2004). Statistical Techniques for Sampling and Monitoring Natural Resources.
26. Sample size for estimating mean and coefficient of variation in species of crotalarias10.1590/0001-3765201820170813 ↗
27. Sample size to estimate the average of variables agronomic in cassava
28. (2023, April 17). KLIC (Korea Law Information Center) Home Page. Guideline for the Greenhouse gas Target Management System. Available online: https://www.law.go.kr/%ED%96%89%EC%A0%95%EA%B7%9C%EC%B9%99/%EC%98%A8%EC%8B%A4%EA%B0%80%EC%8A%A4%C2%B7%EC%97%90%EB%84%88%EC%A7%80%EB%AA%A9%ED%91%9C%EA%B4%80%EB%A6%AC%EC%9A%B4%EC%98%81%EB%93%B1%EC%97%90%EA%B4%80%ED%95%9C%EC%A7%80%EC%B9%A8/(2020-3,20200110).
29. Characterization of the effects of outliers on ComBat harmonization for removing inter-site data heterogeneity in multisite neuroimaging studies10.3389/fnins.2023.1146175 ↗
30. Joint Estimation of Model Parameters and Outlier Effects in Time Series10.1080/01621459.1993.10594321 ↗
31. Speaking Stata: Creating and Varying Box Plots10.1177/1536867X0900900309 ↗
32. An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions10.1016/j.csda.2007.11.008 ↗
33. Outlier Impact and Accommodation Methods: Multiple Comparisons of Type I Error Rates
34. Wu, Y., Curhan, S., and Rosner, B. (2023). Analytical method for detecting outlier evaluators. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 23.10.1186/s12874-023-01988-4 ↗