Generation of Data-Driven Expected Energy Models for Photovoltaic Systems
Source abstract
Abstract
Although unique expected energy models can be generated for a given photovoltaic (PV) site, a standardized model is also needed to facilitate performance comparisons across fleets. Current standardized expected energy models for PV work well with sparse data, but they have demonstrated significant over-estimations, which impacts accurate diagnoses of field operations and maintenance issues. This research addresses this issue by using machine learning to develop a data-driven expected energy model that can more accurately generate inferences for energy production of PV systems. Irradiance and system capacity information was used from 172 sites across the United States to train a series of models using Lasso linear regression. The trained models generally perform better than the commonly used expected energy model from international standard (IEC 61724-1), with the two highest performing models ranging in model complexity from a third-order polynomial with 10 parameters (Radj2 = 0.994) to a simpler, second-order polynomial with 4 parameters (Radj2=0.993), the latter of which is subject to further evaluation. Subsequently, the trained models provide a more robust basis for identifying potential energy anomalies for operations and maintenance activities as well as informing planning-related financial assessments. We conclude with directions for future research, such as using splines to improve model continuity and better capture systems with low (≤1000 kW DC) capacity.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Energy Load and Power Forecasting · Solar Radiation and Photovoltaics · Energy and Environment Impacts
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87123, USA
Department of Statistics and Data Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32826, USA
Funding
Solar Energy Technologies Office
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Golnas, A. (2012, January 3–8). PV system reliability: An operator’s perspective. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE 38th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC) PART 2, Austin, TX, USA.10.1109/PVSC-Vol2.2012.6656744 ↗
2. Feng, M., Bashir, N., Shenoy, P., Irwin, D., and Kosanovic, D. (2020, January 15–17). SunDown: Model-driven Per-Panel Solar Anomaly Detection for Residential Arrays. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGCAS Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, Guayaquil, Ecuador.10.1145/3378393.3402257 ↗
3. Dyamond, W., and Rix, A. (2019, January 29–31). Detecting Anomalous Events for a Grid Connected PV Power Plant Using Sensor Data. Proceedings of the 2019 Southern African Universities Power Engineering Conference/Robotics and Mechatronics/Pattern Recognition Association of South Africa (SAUPEC/RobMech/PRASA), Bloemfontein, South Africa.10.1109/RoboMech.2019.8704812 ↗
4. Reliable fault detection and diagnosis of photovoltaic systems based on statistical monitoring approaches10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.048 ↗
5. Online fault detection in PV systems10.1109/TSTE.2015.2421447 ↗
6. Blair, N., Dobos, A.P., Freeman, J., Neises, T., Wagner, M., Ferguson, T., Gilman, P., and Janzou, S. (2014). System Advisor Model, Sam 2014.1. 14: General Description, National Renewable Energy Lab.. Technical Report.10.2172/1126294 ↗
7. Deline, C., Anderson, K., Jordan, D., Walker, A., Desai, J., Perry, K., Muller, M., Marion, B., and White, R. (2021). PV Fleet Performance Data Initiative: Performance Index-Based Analysis, National Renewable Energy Lab.. Technical Report.10.2172/1766838 ↗
8. Gilletly, S., Jackson, N., and Staid, A. (2021, January 20–25). Quantifying Wildfire-Induced Impacts to Photovoltaic Energy Production in the western United States. Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 48th Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), Online.10.2172/1873057 ↗
9. Klise, G.T., and Stein, J.S. (2009). Models Used to Assess the Performance of Photovoltaic Systems, Sandia National Laboratories.
10. Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance10.1016/j.solener.2005.06.010 ↗
11. Maximum power output performance modeling of solar photovoltaic modules10.1016/j.egyr.2019.09.049 ↗
12. King, D.L., Kratochvil, J.A., and Boyson, W.E. (2004). Photovoltaic Array Performance Model, Sandia National Laboratories.10.2172/919131 ↗
13. Boyson, W.E., Galbraith, G.M., King, D.L., and Gonzalez, S. (2007). Performance Model for Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Inverters, Sandia National Laboratories. Technical Report.10.2172/920449 ↗
14. Dobos, A.P. (2014). PVWatts Version 5 Manual, National Renewable Energy Lab.. Technical Report.10.2172/1158421 ↗
15. (2017). Photovoltaic System Performance—Part 1: Monitoring (Standard No. ISO/IEC TR 29110-1:2016).
16. Myers, D. (2009). Evaluation of the Performance of the Pvusa Rating Methodology Applied to Dual Junction pv Technology: Preprint (Revised), National Renewable Energy Lab.. Technical Report.
17. DNV GL (2019). Narrowing the Performance Gap: Reconciling Predicted and Actual Energy Production, DNV GL. Technical Report.
18. Hanawalt, S. (2020). The Challenge of Perfect Operating Data, Power Factors. Technical Report.
19. Livera, A., Theristis, M., Makrides, G., Sutterlueti, J., Ransome, S., and Georghiou, G.E. (2019, January 9–13). Performance Analysis of Mechanistic and Machine Learning models for Photovoltaic energy yield prediction. Proceedings of the 36th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Marseille, France.
20. Ascencio-Vásquez, J., Bevc, J., Reba, K., Brecl, K., Jankovec, M., and Topič, M. (2020). Advanced PV Performance Modelling Based on Different Levels of Irradiance Data Accuracy. Energies, 13.10.3390/en13092166 ↗
21. Improved artificial neural network method for predicting photovoltaic output performance10.1016/j.gloei.2021.01.005 ↗
22. Bertsimas, D., Delarue, A., Jaillet, P., and Martin, S. (2019). The price of interpretability. arXiv.
23. Klise, G.T. (2015). PV Reliability Operations Maintenance (PVROM) Database: Data Collection & Analysis Insights, Sandia National Lab.. Technical Report.10.2172/1504104 ↗
24. Klise, K.A., Stein, J.S., and Cunningham, J. (2017, January 25–30). Application of IEC 61724 Standards to Analyze PV System Performance in Different Climates. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366666 ↗
25. Klise, K.A. (2016). Performance Monitoring Using Pecos, Sandia National Lab.. Technical Report.10.2172/1734479 ↗
26. (2016). Photovoltaic System Performance—Part 3: Energy Evaluation Method (Standard No. IEC TS 61724-3:2016).
27. Vining, W., and Hansen, C. (2021, December 22). PVAnalytics. Available online: https://github.com/pvlib/pvanalytics.
28. Malik, S., Dassler, D., Fröbel, J., Schneider, J., and Ebert, M. (2014, January 22–26). Outdoor data evaluation of half-/full-cell modules with regard to measurement uncertainties and the application of statistical methods. Proceedings of the 29th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
29. A rank-invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis
30. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso: A retrospective10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00771.x ↗
31. Neural networks and the bias/variance dilemma10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 ↗
32. On the impact of solar spectral irradiance on the yield of different PV technologies10.1016/j.solmat.2014.09.034 ↗
33. Spectral irradiance effects on the outdoor performance of photovoltaic modules10.1016/j.rser.2016.10.062 ↗
34. Arias, A.L. (2020). R-Squared, Adjusted R-Squared, the F Test, and Multicollinearity. Understanding Regression Analysis, Chapman and Hall/CRC.
35. Robust PV degradation methodology and application10.1109/JPHOTOV.2017.2779779 ↗