Modeling and Calculation of Limit Magnitude Detection of Orbital Optoelectric Tracking System
Source abstract
Abstract
In order to evaluate the tracking capability of optoelectric tracking for an orbital target, the limit magnitude detection performance calculation model and its calculation method are studied. Combining the optical signal characteristics of the tracked orbital target, the background, and the CCD noise, the framework of the limit magnitude calculation model of the system for dynamic target detection is constructed. The relationships between the limit magnitude and the signal-to-noise ratio threshold of the optical signal characteristics, the exposure time of the CCD camera, and the dark current of the CCD imaging are studied and analyzed while considering the sunlight illumination condition, so that the calculation function and its change curve are given. The limit magnitude detection capability of the system is verified by the simulated experiment and the synchronized tracking test, and the detection distance maximum error of the model calculation is 3.6 m. The results show that under certain illumination conditions, when the exposure time of the CCD camera is longer and the SNR threshold is lower, the limit magnitude detection performance of the system is better, and the tracking performance of the system is more stable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Measurement and Detection Methods · Infrared Target Detection Methodologies · Optical Systems and Laser Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Xi’an Technological University, Xi’an 710021, China
Funding
Key Science and Technology Program of Shaanxi Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (20)
Show source-provided references
1. Photodetector module of optoelectronic control systems for tracking the moving objects10.15407/spqeo25.03.315 ↗
2. Topley, M., and Richards, J.G. (2020). A comparison of currently available optoelectronic motion capture systems. J. Biomech., 106.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109820 ↗
3. Hybrid nonsingleton fuzzy strong tracking Kalman filtering for high precision photoelectric tracking system10.1109/TII.2022.3160632 ↗
4. Developing a dual axis photoelectric tracking module using a multi quadrant photoelectric device10.1016/j.egyr.2022.07.095 ↗
5. Object detection-tracking algorithm for unmanned surface vehicles based on a radar-photoelectric system10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3072897 ↗
6. Shang, H., and Shen, W. (2023). Design and implementation of a dual-axis solar tracking system. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16176330 ↗
7. A wind vector detecting system based on triboelectric and photoelectric sensors for simultaneously monitoring wind speed and direction10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106382 ↗
8. Physical simulation of trajectory tracking for tracking performance evaluation of photoelectric turntable10.1007/s11801-020-9163-5 ↗
9. Dark target identification algorithm and detecting ability of optoelectronic telescopes10.3788/HPLPB20132503.0587 ↗
10. Limited magnitude calculation method and optics detection performance in a photoelectric tracking system10.1364/AO.54.001612 ↗
11. A novel UV sensor-based dual-axis solar tracking system: Implementation and performance analysis10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117295 ↗
12. Performance comparison of state-of-the-art high-speed video cameras for scientific applications10.1117/1.OE.57.12.124105 ↗
13. Advances in Target Acquisition Modeling II10.1117/1.1410760 ↗
14. Represetnation of Search and Target Acquisition Protoocl in Models and Simulation
15. Target acquisition performance in a cluttered environment10.1364/AO.51.007668 ↗
16. A modern review of the Johnson image resolution criterion10.1016/j.ijleo.2021.168246 ↗
17. Revised targeting task performance (TTP) metric for optical remote sensing system effectiveness evaluation
18. Integration of motion blur into the TTP metric for pilotage performance
19. Evaluating monitoring array performance using upper limit magnitude prediction
20. Giblin, T., Shen CC, H., Roth, B., King, C.L., Strong, D., and Chun, F. (2023, January 19–22). Falcon Telescope Network and USAFA 1-Meter Telescope Systems Limiting Magnitude Research. Proceedings of the Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance (AMOS) Technologies Conference, Maui, HI, USA.