journal article·2025-06-09Open access

A Multi-Machine and Multi-Modal Drift Detection (M2D2) Framework for Semiconductor Manufacturing

Chin-Yi Lin, Tzu-Liang (Bill) Tseng, Tsung-Han Tsai

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 12

Abstract

The semiconductor industry currently lacks a robust, holistic method for detecting parameter drifts in wide-bandgap (WBG) manufacturing, where conventional fault detection and classification (FDC) practices often rely on static thresholds or isolated data modalities. Such legacy approaches cannot fully capture the intricate, multi-modal shifts that either gradually erode product quality or trigger abrupt process disruptions. To surmount these challenges, we present M2D2 (Multi-Machine and Multi-Modal Drift Detection), an end-to-end framework that integrates data preprocessing, baseline modeling, short- and long-term drift detection, interpretability, and a drift-aware federated paradigm. By leveraging self-supervised or unsupervised learning, M2D2 constructs a resilient baseline of nominal behavior across numeric, textual, and categorical features, thereby facilitating the early detection of both rapid spikes and slow-onset deviations. An interpretability layer—using attention visualization or SHAP/LIME—delineates which sensors, logs, or batch identifiers precipitate each drift alert, accelerating root-cause analysis. An active learning loop dynamically refines threshold settings and model parameters in response to real-time feedback, reducing false positives while adapting to evolving production conditions. Crucially, M2D2’s drift-aware federated learning mechanism reweights local updates based on each site’s drift severity, preserving global model integrity at scale. The key scientific breakthrough of this work lies in combining advanced multi-modal processing, short- and long-term anomaly detection, transparent model explainability, and an adaptive federated infrastructure—all within a single, coherent framework. Evaluations of real WBG fabrication data confirm that M2D2 substantially improves drift detection accuracy, broadens anomaly coverage, and offers a transparent, scalable solution for next-generation semiconductor manufacturing.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Data Stream Mining Techniques · Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications · Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Industrial Manufacturing and Systems Engineering, University of Texas at EL Paso, El Paso, TX 79968, USA

Institute of Information and Decision Sciences, National Taipei University of Business, Taipei 10051, Taiwan

Funding

U.S. National Science Foundation · U.S. Department of Education

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. High-voltage SiC and GaN power devices10.1016/j.mee.2005.10.057 ↗
2. GaN-based power devices: Physics, reliability, and perspectives10.1063/5.0061354 ↗
3. Montgomery, D. (2020). Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, Wiley.
4. Fault detection using principal components-based Gaussian mixture model for semiconductor manufacturing processes10.1109/TSM.2011.2154850 ↗
5. Key feature identification for monitoring wafer-to-wafer variation in semiconductor manufacturing10.1109/TASE.2022.3141426 ↗
6. Fault detection and classification in solar-based distribution systems in the presence of deep learning and social spider method10.1016/j.solener.2023.111868 ↗
7. Almukadi, W.S., Alrowais, F., Saeed, M.K., Yahya, A.E., Mahmud, A., and Marzouk, R. (2024). Deep feature fusion with computer vision-driven fall detection approach for enhanced assisted living safety. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-71545-6 ↗
8. Variational autoencoders-LSTM based fault detection of time-dependent high-dimensional processes10.1080/00207543.2023.2175591 ↗
9. Supervised contrastive learning for wafer map pattern classification10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107154 ↗
10. Type-LDD: A type-driven lite concept drift detector for data streams10.1109/TKDE.2023.3344602 ↗
11. Fault classification and timing prediction based on shipment inspection data and maintenance reports for semiconductor manufacturing equipment10.1016/j.cie.2022.108972 ↗
12. Dynamic graph regularization for multi-stream concept drift self-adaptation10.1109/TKDE.2024.3401156 ↗
13. An enhanced lithium-ion battery state-of-charge estimation method using long short-term memory with an adaptive state update filter incorporating battery parameters10.1016/j.engappai.2024.107946 ↗
14. Shapley-based explainable AI for clustering applications in fault diagnosis and prognosis10.1007/s10845-024-02468-2 ↗
15. A federated learning approach to mixed fault diagnosis in rotating machinery10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.05.012 ↗
16. Goodfellow, I.J., Mirza, M., Xiao, D., Courville, A., and Bengio, Y. (2013). An empirical investigation of catastrophic forgetting in gradient-based neural networks. arXiv.
17. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., and Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, 5–8 December 2013, Curran Associates Inc.
18. Guo, C., and Berkhahn, F. (2016). Entity embeddings of categorical variables. arXiv.
19. Gondara, L. (2016, January 12–15). Medical image denoising using convolutional denoising autoencoders. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 16th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), Barcelona, Spain.10.1109/ICDMW.2016.0041 ↗
20. Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., and Hinton, G. (2020, January 13–18). A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Virtual.
21. Kipf, T.N., and Welling, M. (2016). Semi-supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. arXiv.
22. Gelman, A., Carlin, J., Stern, H., and Rubin, D.B. (2004). Bayesian Data Analysis, CRC Press.10.1201/9780429258480 ↗
23. Vaswani, A. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Proceeding of the 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA, 4–9 December 2017, Curran Associates Inc.
24. On the tractability of SHAP explanations10.1613/jair.1.13283 ↗
25. McMahan, H.B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., and y Arcas, B.A. (2017, January 20–22). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA.
26. A survey on concept drift adaptation10.1145/2523813 ↗
27. Devroye, L., Györfi, L., and Lugosi, G. (1996). A Probabilistic Theory of Pattern Recognition, Springer.10.1007/978-1-4612-0711-5 ↗
28. Villani, C. (2008). Optimal Transport: Old and New, Springer.10.1007/978-3-540-71050-9 ↗
29. The Glivenko-Cantelli problem10.1214/aop/1176992069 ↗
30. Advances and open problems in federated learning10.1561/2200000083 ↗
31. Federated learning: Challenges, methods, and future directions
32. Shalev-Shwartz, S., and Ben-David, S. (2014). Understanding Machine Learning: From Theory to Algorithms, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781107298019 ↗