Motion Technologies in Support of Fence Athletes: A Systematic Review
Source abstract
Abstract
Sports biomechanics enables thorough examination of athletic movements to enhance athletic performance and/or reduce injury risk. Few studies have looked at the possibilities of cutting-edge technology in fencing, even though it presents an intriguing scenario for sports biomechanics due to the significant demands it places on the body in terms of neuromuscular coordination, strength, power, and musculoskeletal system impact. The aim of the study is to identify and summarise current evidence on the application of motion technologies in support of fence athletes and to provide a framework for the assessment and training of fencers, including performance measures and protocols. Peer-reviewed research was identified from electronic databases using a structured keyword search. Details regarding experimental design, study group characteristics, and measured outcomes were extracted from retrieved studies, summarised, and information regrouped under themes for analysis. The methodological quality of the evidence was evaluated. Thirty-five studies were included in the present review, which showed kinetic, kinematic, muscle recruitment and coordination differences among athletes as gender and athletic training differed. Findings revealed that most of the included studies investigated the lunge technique in professional athletes using Optoelectronic Systems and force platforms as preferred motion technologies. Only nine studies reported the assessment of muscle activation during task execution (25.7%). Less than 20% of the study recurred to Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning (AI/ML) approaches in the analysis. The potential contribution of the user’s kinematic/kinetic data and physiological measures is still underestimated. The recommendations provided in this study could help promote and support further cross-sectional and longitudinal studies in the field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Performance and Training · Muscle activation and electromyography studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Electrical and Information Engineering (DEI), Politecnico di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
Department of Mechanical Mathematics and Management (DMMM), Politecnico di Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy
Department of Translational Biomedicine and Neuroscience (DiBraiN), School of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
Orthopaedic & Trauma Unit, AOU Consorziale Policlinico, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. The Science of Fencing10.2165/00007256-200838060-00003 ↗
2. Sorel, A., Plantard, P., Bideau, N., and Pontonnier, C. (2019). Studying fencing lunge accuracy and response time in uncertain conditions with an innovative simulator. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0218959 ↗
3. Adesida, Y., Papi, E., and McGregor, A.H. (2019). Exploring the role of wearable technology in sport kinematics and kinetics: A systematic review. Sensors, 19.10.3390/s19071597 ↗
4. Application of motion capture technology for sport performance analysis
5. Lim, J.Z., Sim, A., and Kong, P.W. (2021). Wearable Technologies in Field Hockey Competitions: A Scoping Review. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21155242 ↗
6. Recommendations for assessment of the reliability, sensitivity, and validity of data provided by wearable sensors designed for monitoring physical activity
7. VP26 A critical appraisal tool for systematic mixed studies reviews10.1017/S0266462318003471 ↗
8. Kinematic determinants of weapon velocity during the fencing lunge in experienced épée fencers
9. Gender differences in limb and joint stiffness during the fencing lunge
10. Borysiuk, Z., Markowska, N., Konieczny, M., Kręcisz, K., Błaszczyszyn, M., Nikolaidis, P.T., Knechtle, B., and Pakosz, P. (2019). Flèche versus Lunge as the Optimal Footwork Technique in Fencing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 16.10.3390/ijerph16132315 ↗
11. Morris, N., Farnsworth, M., and Robertson, D. (July, January 27). Kinetic analyses of two fencing attacks–lunge and fleche. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Porto, Portugal.
12. Fine classification of complex motion pattern in fencing10.1016/j.proeng.2010.04.168 ↗
13. Determination of loading in the lower limb joints during step-forward lunge in fencing
14. Biomechanical insights into the determinants of speed in the fencing lunge10.1080/17461391.2017.1414886 ↗
15. Motion adaptation in fencing lunges: A pilot study10.1080/10255842.2017.1382912 ↗
16. Novel lunge biomechanics in modern Sabre fencing10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.227 ↗
17. Kinematics analysis of lunge fencing using stereophotogrametry
18. Biomechanical analysis of knee joint mechanism of the national women’s epee fencing lunge movement
19. Hassan, S.E., and Klauck, J. (1998, January 21–25). Kinematics of lower and upper extremities motions during the fencing lunge: Results and training implications. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Konstanz, Germany.
20. Klauck, J., and Hassan, S.E. (1998, January 21–25). Lower and upper extremity coordination parameters during the fencing lunge. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Konstanz, Germany.
21. Zhang, B., Chu, D., and Hong, Y. (July, January 30). Biomechanical analysis of the lunge technique in the elite female fencers. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Perth, WA, Australia.
22. Response timing in the lunge and target change in elite versus medium-level fencers10.1080/17461391.2011.635704 ↗
23. Effect of target change during the simple attack in fencing10.1080/02640414.2013.770908 ↗
24. Gender differences in the kinetics and lower extremity kinematics of the fencing lunge10.1080/24748668.2013.11868660 ↗
25. Grontman, A., Horyza, Ł., Koczan, K., Marzec, M., Śmiertka, M., and Trybała, M. (2020, January 2–4). Analysis of sword fencing training evaluation possibilities using Motion Capture techniques. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE 15th International Conference of System of Systems Engineering (SoSE), Budapest, Hungary.10.1109/SoSE50414.2020.9130469 ↗
26. Comparison of reaction time between beginners and experienced fencers during quasi-realistic fencing situations10.1080/17461391.2019.1671498 ↗
27. Effects of specific muscle imbalance improvement training on the balance ability in elite fencers10.1589/jpts.27.1589 ↗
28. An applied paradigm for simple analysis of the lower limb kinematic chain in explosive movements: An example using the fencing foil attacking lunge10.1080/23335432.2018.1454342 ↗
29. The appropriateness of the helical axis technique and six available cardan sequences for the representation of 3-d lead leg kinematics during the fencing lunge10.2478/hukin-2013-0020 ↗
30. Neuromuscular, perceptual, and temporal determinants of movement patterns in wheelchair fencing: Preliminary study10.1155/2020/6584832 ↗
31. Analysis of performance of the fencing lunge with regard to the difficulty level of a technical-tactical task10.5604/20815735.1090658 ↗
32. Response timing and muscular coordination in fencing: A comparison of elite and novice fencers10.1016/S1440-2440(00)80011-0 ↗
33. Analysis of the fencing lunge based on the response to a visual stimulus and a tactile stimulus10.5604/20815735.1142448 ↗
34. Mechanical and muscular coordination patterns during a high-level fencing assault10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a6401b ↗
35. Type of perception vs. lunge in fencing technique structure10.18002/rama.v11i2s.4160 ↗
36. Electromyography signal analysis of the fencing lunge by Magda Mroczkiewicz, the leading world female competitor in foil10.2478/v10131-011-0017-1 ↗
37. Malawski, F., and Kwolek, B. (2016, January 21–23). Classification of basic footwork in fencing using accelerometer. Proceedings of the 2016 Signal Processing: Algorithms, Architectures, Arrangements, and Applications (SPA), Poznan, Poland.10.1109/SPA.2016.7763586 ↗
38. Depth Versus Inertial Sensors in Real-Time Sports Analysis: A Case Study on Fencing10.1109/JSEN.2020.3036436 ↗
39. Classification of lunge biomechanics with multiple and individual inertial measurement units10.1080/14763141.2017.1314544 ↗
40. Mawgoud, A.A., Abu-Talleb, A., El Karadawy, A.I., and Eltabey, M.M. (2020, December 01). The Appliance of Artificial Neural Networks in Fencing Sport Via Kinect Sensor. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ahmed-A-Mawgoud/publication/343055177_The_Appliance_of_Artificial_Neural_Networks_in_Fencing_Sport_Via_Kinect_Sensor/links/5f141f25299bf1e548c365ce/The-Appliance-of-Artificial-Neural-Networks-in-Fencing-Sport-Via-Kinect-Sensor.pdf.
41. Riehle, H.J., and Vieten, M.M. (1998, January 21–25). ISBS ’98: XVI International Symposium on Biomechanics in Sports. Proceedings of the ISBS-Conference Proceedings Archive, Konstanz, Germany.
42. Chtara, H., Negra, Y., Chaabene, H., Chtara, M., Cronin, J., and Chaouachi, A. (2020). Validity and reliability of a new test of change of direction in fencing athletes. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17124545 ↗
43. Time–motion analysis of elite field hockey, with special reference to repeated-sprint activity10.1080/02640410410001716715 ↗
44. Incidence and characteristics of time-loss injuries in competitive fencing: A prospective, 5-year study of national competitions10.1097/JSM.0b013e318161548d ↗
45. Chen, T.L.W., Wong, D.W.C., Wang, Y., Ren, S., Yan, F., and Zhang, M. (2017). Biomechanics of fencing sport: A scoping review. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0171578 ↗
46. Strength and conditioning for fencing10.1519/SSC.0b013e31826e7283 ↗
47. Predicting sports injuries with wearable technology and data analysis10.1007/s10796-020-10018-3 ↗
48. Demise of the fittest: Are we destroying our biggest talents?10.1136/bjsports-2014-093832 ↗
49. Rigozzi, C.J., Vio, G.A., and Poronnik, P. (2022). Application of wearable technologies for player motion analysis in racket sports: A systematic review. Int. J. Sport. Sci. Coach., 17479541221138015.10.1177/17479541221138015 ↗
50. Wearable inertial sensors in swimming motion analysis: A systematic review10.1080/02640414.2014.962574 ↗
51. The evolution of methods for the capture of human movement leading to markerless motion capture for biomechanical applications
52. Applications and limitations of current markerless motion capture methods for clinical gait biomechanics10.7717/peerj.12995 ↗
53. Türker, H., and Sze, H. (2013). Surface electromyography in sports and exercise. Electrodiagn. New Front. Clin. Res., 175–194.10.5772/56167 ↗
54. European recommendations for surface electromyography
55. In fencing, does intensive practice equally improve the speed performance of the touché when it is performed alone and in combination with the lunge?10.1055/s-2000-8864 ↗
56. Why do people jump the way they do?10.1097/00003677-200107000-00002 ↗
57. Ning, C. (2019). Design and research of motion video image analysis system in sports training. Multimed. Tools Appl., 1–19.10.1007/s11042-019-7374-1 ↗
58. Position and orientation in space of bones during movement: Anatomical frame definition and determination10.1016/0268-0033(95)91394-T ↗
59. Dempster, W.T. (1955). Space Requirements of the Seated Operator, Geometrical, Kinematic, and Mechanical Aspects of the Body with Special Reference to the Limbs, Michigan State Univ East Lansing. Technical Report.10.21236/AD0087892 ↗
60. Aresta, S., Bortone, I., Bottiglione, F., Di Noia, T., Di Sciascio, E., Lofù, D., Musci, M., Narducci, F., Pazienza, A., and Sardone, R. (2022). Combining Biomechanical Features and Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Fencers’ Levels for Training Support. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312350 ↗