Effects of Reflectance of Backsheets and Spacing between Cells on Photovoltaic Modules
Source abstract
Abstract
In the photovoltaic (PV) module manufacturing process, cell-to-module (CTM) loss is inevitably caused by the optical loss, and it generally leads to the output power loss of about 2~3%. It is known that the CTM loss rate can be reduced by increasing the reflectance of a backsheet and reflective area through widening spaces between the PV cell strings. In this study, multi-busbars (MBB) and shingled PV cells were connected in series, and a mini-module composed of four cells was fabricated with a white and black backsheet to investigate the effects of reflectance of backsheets and space between the PV cells. Moreover, the MBB modules with cell gap spaces of 0.5 mm, 1.5 mm, and 2.5 mm were demonstrated with fixed 3 mm spaces between the strings. The shingled modules with varying spaces from 2 mm to 6 mm were also tested, and our results show that spacing between PV cells and strings should be well-balanced to minimize the CTM loss to maximize the output power (efficiency).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques · solar cell performance optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
New & Renewable Energy Research Center, Korea Electronics Technology Institute (KETI), 25, Saenari-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si 13509, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
Funding
Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. A review of photovoltaic performance of organic/inorganic solar cells for future renewable and sustainable energy technologies10.1016/j.spmi.2020.106549 ↗
2. TOPCon—Technology options for cost efficient industrial manufacturing10.1016/j.solmat.2021.111100 ↗
3. A Review on TOPCon Solar Cell Technology
4. Impact of boron doping on electrical performance and efficiency of n-TOPCon solar cell10.1016/j.solener.2021.08.075 ↗
5. Optimization of TOPCon Structured Solar Cell Using AFORS-HET10.1007/s42341-020-00220-0 ↗
6. Efficient carrier-selective p- and n-contacts for Si solar cells10.1016/j.solmat.2014.05.039 ↗
7. Tunnel oxide passivated contacts as an alternative to partial rear contacts10.1016/j.solmat.2014.06.015 ↗
8. Tunnel oxide passivating electron contacts as full-area rear emitter of high-efficiency p-type silicon solar cells10.1002/pip.2960 ↗
9. An industrially viable TOPCon structure with both ultra-thin SiOx and n+-poly-Si processed by PECVD for p-type c-Si solar cells10.1016/j.solmat.2019.109926 ↗
10. Kim, K., Lee, S., Chowdhury, S., and Yi, J. (2021). A Brief Review of Passivation Materials and Process for High Efficiency PERC Solar Cell. Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater., 1–5.10.1007/s42341-021-00366-5 ↗
11. A simulation study to evaluate and compare monofacial Vs bifacial PERC PV cells and the effect of albedo on bifacial performance10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.632 ↗
12. Industrial Silicon Solar Cells Applying the Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC) Concept—A Review10.1109/JPHOTOV.2016.2571627 ↗
13. Influence of surface structure on the performance of mono-like Si PERC solar cell10.1016/j.mssp.2021.105662 ↗
14. The Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC): From conception to mass production10.1016/j.solmat.2015.06.055 ↗
15. Development of the PERC Solar Cell10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2899460 ↗
16. Progress on the intrinsic a-Si:H films for interface passivation of silicon heterojunction solar cells: A review10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.121166 ↗
17. Review on applications of PEDOTs and PEDOT:PSS in perovskite solar cells10.1007/s10854-020-03473-w ↗
18. Identification of embedded nanotwins at c-Si/a-Si:H interface limiting the performance of high-efficiency silicon heterojunction solar cells10.1038/s41560-020-00768-4 ↗
19. Surface Modifications for Light Trapping in Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells: A Brief Review10.1007/s42341-020-00203-1 ↗
20. Achievement of More Than 25% Conversion Efficiency With Crystalline Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cell10.1109/JPHOTOV.2014.2352151 ↗
21. High-efficiency Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells: A Review10.1515/green-2011-0018 ↗
22. Optimization and Characterization of Amorphous/Crystalline Silicon Heterojunction Solar Cells10.1002/pip.398 ↗
23. Mittag, M., Zech, T., Wiese, M., Bläsi, D., Ebert, M., and Wirth, H. (2017, January 25−30). Cell-to-Module (CTM) Analysis for Photovoltaic Modules with Shingled Solar Cells. Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 44th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (PVSC), Washington, DC, USA.10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366260 ↗
24. A Study on Correlation Peel Strength and the Efficiency of Shingled Modules According to Curing Condition of Electrically Conductive Adhesives
25. Study on Shingled String Interconnection for High Power Solar Module
26. Metallization of crystalline silicon solar cells for shingled photovoltaic module application10.1016/j.solener.2019.11.095 ↗
27. The multi-busbar design: An overview10.1016/j.egypro.2013.11.092 ↗
28. Park, J.E., Choi, W.S., and Lim, D. (2021). Cell/Module Integration Technology with Wire-Embedded EVA Sheet. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11094170 ↗
29. Energy simulation of p-PERC bifacial modules based on different installation environment10.1088/1755-1315/675/1/012188 ↗
30. Reflection and durability study of different types of backsheetsand their impact on c-Si PV module perform10.1016/j.solmat.2015.11.038 ↗
31. PV module current gains due to structured backsheets10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.286 ↗
32. Cell-to-module optical loss/gain analysis for various photovoltaic module materials through systematic characterization10.7567/JJAP.56.08MD03 ↗