journal article·2010-07

Protein adhesion and cell response on atmospheric pressure dielectric barrier discharge-modified polymer surfaces

Raechelle A. D’Sa, George A. Burke, Brian J. Meenan

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 6· Issue 7
Publisher page

Abstract

Gaseous plasma discharges are one of the most common means to modify the surface of a polymer without affecting its bulk properties. However, this normally requires the materials to be processed in vacuo to create the active species required to permanently modify the surface chemistry. The ability to invoke such changes under normal ambient conditions in a cost-effective manner has much to offer to enhance the response of medical implants in vivo. It is therefore important to accurately determine the nature and scale of the effects derived from this technology. This paper reports on the modification of poly(styrene) (PS) and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) using atmospheric pressure plasma processing via exposure to a dielectric barrier discharge (DBD). The changes in surface chemistry and topography after DBD treatment were characterised using water contact angle, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and atomic force microscopy. A marked increase in the surface oxygen concentration was observed for both PMMA and PS. An increase in surface roughness was observed for PMMA, but not for PS. These changes were found to result in an increase in surface wettability for both polymers. Adsorption of albumin (Alb) onto these substrates was studied using XPS and quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). The rate of adsorption of Alb onto pristine PMMA and PS was faster than that on the DBD-treated polymers. XPS indicated that a similar concentration of Alb occurred on both of the treated surfaces. Deconvolution of the C1s XPS spectra showed that Alb is adsorbed differently on pristine (hydrophobic) compared to DBD-treated (hydrophilic) surfaces, with more polar functional groups oriented towards the upper surface in the latter case. The QCM-D data corroborates this finding, in that a more viscoelastic layer of Alb was formed on the DBD-treated surfaces relative to that on the pristine surfaces. It was also found that Alb was more easily replaced by larger proteins from foetal bovine serum on the DBD-treated surfaces. The viability of human lens epithelial cells on both of the DBD-treated polymer surface was significantly (P<0.05) greater than on the respective pristine surfaces. In addition, cells that adhered to the treated polymers exhibited a polygonal morphology with well spread actin stress fibres compared with the contracted shape displayed on the pristine surfaces. The results presented here clearly indicate that DBD surface modification has the capability to influence key protein and cell responses.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials · Surface Modification and Superhydrophobicity · Polymer Surface Interaction Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. Biological surface science10.1016/S0039-6028(01)01809-X ↗
2. Biological ahesion at interfaces10.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.003251 ↗
3. Mediation of biomaterial–cell interactions by adsorbed proteins: a review10.1089/ten.2005.11.1 ↗
4. Get a grip: integrins in cell–biomaterial interactions10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.05.029 ↗
5. Rewiring cell adhesion10.1021/ja039058e ↗
6. Adsorption and elution of extracellular matrix proteins on non-tissue culture polystyrene Petri dishes10.1016/0021-9797(92)90313-B ↗
7. Top-down analysis of a dynamic environment: extracellular matrix structure and function
8. Surface treatment of polymers for biocompatibility10.1146/annurev.ms.26.080196.002053 ↗
9. Surface engineering strategies for control of protein and cell interactions10.1016/j.susc.2004.06.182 ↗
10. Exploring and engineering the cell surface interface10.1126/science.1106587 ↗
11. Plasma-surface modification of biomaterials10.1016/S0927-796X(02)00004-9 ↗
12. Surface recovery and degradation of air dielectric barrier discharge processed poly(methyl methacrylate) and poly(ether ether ketone) films10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.07.006 ↗
13. Statistical analysis of the effect of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) operating parameters on the surface processing of poly(methylmethacrylate) film10.1016/j.susc.2004.11.026 ↗
14. Dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) processing of PMMA surface: optimization of operational parameters10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.04.001 ↗
15. Effect of air plasma processing on the adsorption behaviour of bovine serum albumin on spin-coated PMMA surfaces10.1016/S1672-6529(08)60026-8 ↗
16. Surface oxygenation of polypropylene using an air dielectric barrier discharge: the effect of different electrode–platen combinations10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.02.012 ↗
17. A model for plasma modification of polypropylene using atmospheric pressure discharges10.1088/0022-3727/36/6/309 ↗
18. From ozone generators to flat television screens: history and future potential of dielectric-barrier discharges10.1351/pac199971101819 ↗
19. Effects of DBD plasma operating parameters on the polymer surface modification10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.01.024 ↗
20. Comparative study on the effect of RF and DBD plasma treatment on PTFE surface modification10.1016/j.matchemphys.2004.01.026 ↗
21. The effect of an air-dielectric barrier discharge on the surface properties and peel strength of medical packaging materials10.1016/S0257-8972(03)00798-9 ↗
22. Oxidative functionalization of carbon nanotubes in atmospheric pressure filamentary dielectric barrier discharge (APDBD)10.1016/j.carbon.2005.06.033 ↗
23. Study of the surface modification of a Nylon-6,6 film processed in an atmospheric pressure air dielectric barrier discharge10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.006 ↗
24. The effect of dielectric barrier discharge configuration on the surface modification of aromatic polymers10.1088/0022-3727/38/6/022 ↗
25. Uniformity analysis of dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) processed polyethylene terephthalate (PET) surface10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.04.016 ↗
26. 1992
27. Adsorption and relaxation kinetics of albumin and fibrinogen on hydrophobic surfaces: single-species and competitive behaviour10.1021/la990089q ↗
28. The surface oxidation of selected polymers using an atmospheric pressure air dielectric barrier discharge10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.10.002 ↗
29. Dielectric barrier discharge for surface treatment: application to selected polymers in film and fibre form10.1088/0963-0252/12/3/306 ↗
30. Surface roughness and contact angle10.1021/j150474a015 ↗
31. Interpretation of protein adsorption: surface-induced conformational changes10.1021/ja042898o ↗
32. Interfacial thermodynamics of protein adsorption, ion co-adsorption and ion binding in solution: I. Phenomenological linkage relations for ion exchange in lysozyme chromatography and titration in solution10.1016/0301-4622(91)80028-P ↗
33. Interfacial thermodynamics of protein adsorption, ion co-adsorption and ion binding in solution: II. Model interpretation of ion exchange in lysozyme chromatography10.1016/0301-4622(91)80029-Q ↗
34. Interfacial thermodynamics of protein adsorption and ion co-adsorption. III. Electrochemistry of bovine serum albumin adsorption on silver iodide10.1016/0301-4622(91)85041-N ↗
35. Adsorption of proteins at solid–liquid interfaces
36. The behavior of proteins at interfaces, with special attention to the role of the structure stability of the protein molecule10.1016/0267-6605(92)90032-O ↗
37. Protein adsorption and bacterial adhesion to solid surfaces: A colloid-chemical approach10.1016/0166-6622(89)80138-6 ↗
38. Protein adsorption at solid–liquid interfaces: Reversibility and conformation aspects10.1016/0021-9797(86)90113-X ↗
39. Why proteins prefer interfaces10.1080/09205063.1991.9756659 ↗
40. Competitive adsorption of vitronectin with albumin, fibrinogen, and fibronectin on polymeric biomaterials10.1002/jbm.820250804 ↗
41. Vroman effects, techniques, and philosophies10.1080/09205063.1991.9756657 ↗