journal article·2018-07

Influence of ageing on glass and resin bonding of dental glass-ceramic veneer adhesion to zirconia: A fracture mechanics analysis and interpretation

M.V. Swain, C. Gee, K.C. Li

Acta Biomaterialia· Volume 74
Publisher page

Abstract

Adhesion plays a major role in the bonding of dental materials. In this study the adhesion of two glass-ceramic systems (IPS e.max and VITABLOCS) to a zirconia sintered substrate using a glass (for IPS e.max) and resin (VITABLOCS) before and after exposure to ageing for 14 days in distilled water at 37 °C are compared using two interfacial fracture mechanics tests, the 3 point bend Schwickerath (Kosyfaki and Swain, 2014; Schneider and Swain, 2015) and 4 point bend (Charalambides et al., 1989) approaches. Both tests result in stable crack extension from which the strain energy release rate (G, N/m or J/m2) can be determined. In the case of the 3 PB test the Work of Fracture was also determined. In addition, the Schwickerath test enables determination of the critical stress for the onset of cracking to occur, which forms the basis of the ISO (ISO9693-2:2016) adhesion test for porcelain ceramic adhesion to zirconia. For the aged samples there was a significant reduction in the resin-bonded strengths (Schwickerath) and strain energy release rate (both 3 and 4 PB tests), which was not evident for the glass bonded specimens. Critical examination of the force-displacement curves showed that ageing of the resin resulted in a major change in the form of the curves, which may be interpreted in terms of a reduction in the critical stress to initiate cracking and also in the development of an R-curve. The extent of the reduction in strain energy release rate following ageing was greater for the Schwickerath test than the Charalambides test. The results are discussed in terms of; the basic mechanics of these two tests, the deterioration of the resin bonding following moisture exposure and the different dimensions of the specimens. These in-vitro results raise concerns regarding resin bonding to zirconia. Statement of significance The present study uses a novel approach to investigate the role of ageing or environmental degradation on the adhesive bonding of two dental ceramics to zirconia. This continues to be a major clinical problem but current approaches, till now, have relied upon a myriad of strength based tests to quantify the extent of environmental degradation with time. In this paper we use two fracture mechanics approaches, based upon simple 3 and 4 point bend testing procedures that enable stable debonding crack extension to occur. The paper provides a more critical approach to evaluate the role of environmental degradation of adhesion for dental materials.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Research and COVID-19 · Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Adhesion determination of dental porcelain to zirconia using the Schwickerath test: strength vs. fracture energy approach10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.028 ↗
2. The Schwickerath adhesion test: a fracture mechanics analysis10.1016/j.dental.2015.05.007 ↗
3. A test specimen for determining the fracture resistance of bimaterial interfaces10.1115/1.3176069 ↗
4. ISO 9693-2:2016 Porcelain-zirconia dental restorative systems see also DIN EN ISO 9693: 1999. (= ISO 9693:1999 = EN ISO 9693:2000 12) Metal-ceramic dental restorative systems. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. Beuth Verlag, Berlin
5. Resin-ceramic bonding: a review of the literature10.1067/mpr.2003.50 ↗
6. Adhesion to zirconia used for dental restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
7. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review
8. Chipping behaviour of all-ceramic crowns with zirconia framework and CAD/CAM manufactured veneer10.1016/j.jdent.2011.12.007 ↗
9. Chipping of veneering porcelain on all-ceramic dental crowns and bridges10.1016/j.actbio.2008.12.016 ↗
10. Evaluation of resin bond strength to yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia and framework marginal fit: comparison of different surface conditionings10.2341/12-269-L ↗
11. Direct comparison of the bond strength results of the different test methods: a critical literature review10.1016/j.dental.2009.12.002 ↗
12. Zur Verbundfestigkeit von Metallkeramik, A contribution to the bond strength of porcelain-fused-to metal
13. Bond strength of metal-ceramic systems in three-point flexure bond test10.1002/jab.770060108 ↗
14. Mixed-mode cracking in layered materials10.1016/S0065-2156(08)70164-9 ↗
15. Mencik · 1996
16. Evaluation of the strain energy release rate for the fracture of titanium—porcelain interfacial bonding10.1016/S0142-9612(97)80007-5 ↗
17. New approach for evaluating metal-porcelain interfacial bonding
18. Influence of the bonder on the adhesion of porcelain to machined titanium as determined by the strain energy release rate10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.022 ↗
19. Effect of thermal expansion mismatch on the Y-TZP/veneer interfacial adhesion determined by strain energy release rate10.1016/j.jpor.2011.09.002 ↗
20. Comparison of three and four point bending evaluation of two adhesive bonding systems for glass-ceramic zirconia bi-layered ceramics10.1016/j.dental.2017.06.007 ↗
21. Modified four-point bending specimen for determining the interface fracture energy for thin, brittle layers10.1023/A:1007530932726 ↗
22. Damage tolerance of indirect restorative materials (including PICN) after simulated bur adjustments10.1016/j.dental.2015.03.007 ↗
23. Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement10.1016/j.jpor.2009.09.004 ↗
24. Shear strength and interfacial toughness characterization of sapphire-epoxy interfaces for nacre-inspired composites10.1021/acsami.6b09050 ↗
25. Budynas−Nisbett, Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design, eighth ed., McGraw-Hill, 2008, p.144. Chp. 4.
26. Lawn · 1993
27. Influence of water, loading rate and bonder on the adhesion of porcelain to titanium10.1016/j.jdent.2005.11.004 ↗
28. Environmental effects on interfacial adhesion10.1016/S0026-2714(01)00150-0 ↗