Validation of a Wearable IMU System for Gait Analysis: Protocol and Application to a New System
Source abstract
Abstract
Miniaturized wearable Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) offer new opportunities for the functional assessment of motor functions for medicine, sport, and ergonomics. Sparse reliability validation studies have been conducted without a common specific approach and protocol. A set of guidelines to design validation protocol for these systems is proposed hereafter. They are based on the comparison between video analysis and the gold standard optoelectronic motion capture system for Gait Analysis (GA). A setup of the protocol has been applied to a wearable device implementing an inertial measurement unit and a dedicated harmonic oscillator kinematic model of the center of mass. In total, 10 healthy volunteers took part in the study, and four trials of walking at a self-selected speed and step length have been simultaneously recorded by the two systems, analyzed, and compared blindly (40 datasets). The model detects the steps and the foot which supports body weight. The stride time and the cadence have a mean absolute percentage error of 5.7% and 4.9%, respectively. The mean absolute percentage error in the measurement of step’s length and step’s speed is 5.6% and 13.5%, respectively. Results confirm that the proposed methodology is complete and effective. It is demonstrated that the developed wearable system allows for a reliable assessment of human gait spatio-temporal parameters. Therefore, the goal of this paper is threefold. The first goal is to present and define structured Protocol Design Guidelines, where the related setup is implemented for the validation of wearable IMU systems particularly dedicated to GA and gait monitoring. The second goal is to apply these Protocol Design Guidelines to a case study in order to verify their feasibility, user-friendliness, and efficacy. The third goal is the validation of our biomechanical kinematic model with the gold standard reference.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring · Gait Recognition and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Design, TEDH Lab & E4Sport Lab, Politecnico di Milano, Via Giovanni Durando 38/A, 20158 Milan, Italy
Department of Rehabilitation, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milan, Italy
Villa Beretta Rehabilitation Center Hospital, Via Nazario Sauro 17, Costa Masnaga, 23845 Lecco, Italy
CNR—IBFM Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, LITA Building, Via F.lli Cervi 93, Segrate, 20090 Milan, Italy
Funding
Fondazione Cariplo
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. A Practical Guide to Gait Analysis10.5435/00124635-200205000-00009 ↗
2. Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults10.1016/S0924-980X(97)00055-6 ↗
3. A kinematic comparison of overground andtreadmill walking10.1016/S0268-0033(98)00012-6 ↗
4. A three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy elderly subjects10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2009.09.002 ↗
5. A kinematic study of long-term habituation to treadmill walking10.1080/00140138108924874 ↗
6. (2018, January 17). Xsens Technologies, Enschede, The Netherlands. Available online: https://www.xsens.com/.
7. (2018, January 17). Yost Labs, Portsmouth, OH, USA. Available online: https://yostlabs.com/.
8. Inertial Sensor-Based Gait Recognition: A Review10.3390/s150922089 ↗
9. Estimation of gait cycle characteristics by trunk accelerometry10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00233-1 ↗
10. Assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters from trunk accelerations during human walking10.1016/S0966-6362(02)00190-X ↗
11. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation10.1186/1743-0003-9-21 ↗
12. Spulber, I., Papi, E., Chen, Y.-M., Anastasova-Ivanova, S., Bergmann, J., Georgiou, P., and McGregor, A.H. (2014, January 22–24). Development of a wireless multi-functional body sensing platform for smart garment integration. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Biomedical Circuits and Systems Conference (BioCAS), Lausanne, Switzerland.10.1109/BioCAS.2014.6981669 ↗
13. Andreoni, G., Standoli, C.E., and Perego, P. (2016). Defining Requirements and Related Methods for Designing Sensorized Garments. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16060769 ↗
14. Lymberis, A., and Gatzoulis, L. (September, January 31). Wearable Health Systems: From smart technologies to real applications. Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, New York, NY, USA.
15. Gait Analysis Using Wearable Sensors10.3390/s120202255 ↗
16. Gait Analysis Methods: An Overview of Wearable and Non-Wearable Systems, Highlighting Clinical Applications10.3390/s140203362 ↗
17. A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis10.1109/TSMCC.2009.2032660 ↗
18. The force-driven harmonic oscillator as a model for human locomotion10.1016/0167-9457(90)90035-C ↗
19. Step Length Estimation Using Handheld Inertial Sensors10.3390/s120708507 ↗
20. Novel algorithm for a smartphone-based 6-minute walk test application: Algorithm, application development, and evaluation10.1186/s12984-015-0013-9 ↗
21. Cresswell, K.G., Shin, Y., and Chen, S. (2017). Quantifying Variation in Gait Features from Wearable Inertial Sensors Using Mixed Effects Models. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17030466 ↗
22. Using Distributed Wearable Sensors to Measure and Evaluate Human Lower Limb Motions10.1109/TIM.2015.2504078 ↗
23. Fusca, M., Perego, P., and Andreoni, G. (2017, January 19–23). A Novel Kinematic Model for Wearable Gait Analysis. Proceedings of the eTELEMED 2017: The Ninth International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine, Nice, France.
24. Method for wearable kinematic gait analysis using a harmonic oscillator applied to the Center of Mass10.1155/2018/4548396 ↗
25. Patterson, M.R., Johnston, W., O’Mahony, N., O’Mahony, S., Nolan, E., and Caulfield, B. (2016, January 16–20). Validation of temporal gait metrics from three IMU locations to the gold standard force plate. Proceedings of the 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Orlando, FL, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590790 ↗
26. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90837-8 ↗
27. Basic gait parameters: Reference data for normal subjects, 10–79 years of age
28. Basic gait parameters: A comparison of reference data for normal subjects 20 to 29 years of age from Kuwait and Scandinavia10.1682/JRRD.2003.07.0361 ↗
29. A gait analysis data collection and reduction technique10.1016/0167-9457(91)90046-Z ↗
30. Jakobsen, J.C., Gluud, C., Winkel, P., Lange, T., and Wetterslev, J. (2014). The thresholds for statistical and clinical significance—A five-step procedure for evaluation of intervention effects in randomised clinical trials. BMC Med. Res. Methodol., 14.10.1186/1471-2288-14-34 ↗
31. The effect of walking speed on center of mass displacement10.1682/JRRD.2003.10.0150 ↗
32. Jurcevic Lulic, T., and Muftic, O. (2002, January 14–17). Trajectory of the human body mass centre during walking at different speed. Proceedings of the 7th International Design Conference (Design 2002), Cavtat, Croatia.