Extensive Benchmarking of DFT+U Calculations for Predicting Band Gaps
Source abstract
Abstract
Accurate computational predictions of band gaps are of practical importance to the modeling and development of semiconductor technologies, such as (opto)electronic devices and photoelectrochemical cells. Among available electronic-structure methods, density-functional theory (DFT) with the Hubbard U correction (DFT+U) applied to band edge states is a computationally tractable approach to improve the accuracy of band gap predictions beyond that of DFT calculations based on (semi)local functionals. At variance with DFT approximations, which are not intended to describe optical band gaps and other excited-state properties, DFT+U can be interpreted as an approximate spectral-potential method when U is determined by imposing the piecewise linearity of the total energy with respect to electronic occupations in the Hubbard manifold (thus removing self-interaction errors in this subspace), thereby providing a (heuristic) justification for using DFT+U to predict band gaps. However, it is still frequent in the literature to determine the Hubbard U parameters semiempirically by tuning their values to reproduce experimental band gaps, which ultimately alters the description of other total-energy characteristics. Here, we present an extensive assessment of DFT+U band gaps computed using self-consistent ab initio U parameters obtained from density-functional perturbation theory to impose the aforementioned piecewise linearity of the total energy. The study is carried out on 20 compounds containing transition-metal or p-block (group III-IV) elements, including oxides, nitrides, sulfides, oxynitrides, and oxysulfides. By comparing DFT+U results obtained using nonorthogonalized and orthogonalized atomic orbitals as Hubbard projectors, we find that the predicted band gaps are extremely sensitive to the type of projector functions and that the orthogonalized projectors give the most accurate band gaps, in satisfactory agreement with experimental data. This work demonstrates that DFT+U may serve as a useful method for high-throughput workflows that require reliable band gap predictions at moderate computational cost.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Machine Learning in Materials Science · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA
Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS) and National Centre for Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials (MARVEL), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
Funding
National Science Foundation · Swiss National Science Foundation
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. Inhomogeneous electron gas10.1103/PhysRev.136.B864 ↗
2. Self-consistent equations including exchange and correlation effects10.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
3. Physical content of the exact Kohn-Sham orbital energies: Band gaps and derivative discontinuities10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1884 ↗
4. Self-interaction correction to density-functional approximations for many-electron systems10.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
5. Insights into current limitations of Density Functional Theory10.1126/science.1158722 ↗
6. Effect of Fock exchange on the electronic structure and magnetic coupling in NiO10.1103/PhysRevB.65.155102 ↗
7. The performance of hybrid density functionals in solid state chemistry10.1007/b97944 ↗
8. Metal-insulator and magnetic transition of NiO at high pressures10.1103/PhysRevB.69.035114 ↗
9. Electronic structure of the antiferromagnetic B1-structured FeO10.1103/PhysRevB.70.165111 ↗
10. Hybrid density functional calculations of redox potentials and formation energies of transition metal compounds10.1103/PhysRevB.82.075122 ↗
11. Calibrating transition-metal energy levels and oxygen bands in first-principles calculations: Accurate prediction of redox potentials and charge transfer in lithium transition-metal oxides10.1103/PhysRevB.92.115118 ↗
12. Tolba, S., Gameel, K., Ali, B., Almossalami, H., and Allam, N. (2018). Density Functional Calculations-Recent Progresses of Theory and Application, IntechOpen.
13. Self-consistent hybrid functional for condensed systems10.1103/PhysRevB.89.195112 ↗
14. Nonempirical range-separated hybrid functionals for solids and molecules10.1103/PhysRevB.93.235106 ↗
15. Nonempirical hybrid functionals for band gaps of inorganic metal-halide perovskites10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.123802 ↗
16. Excitation gaps of finite-sized systems from optimally tuned range-separated hybrid functionals10.1021/ct2009363 ↗
17. Wing, D., Ohad, G., Haber, J., Filip, M., Gant, S., Neaton, J., and Kronik, L. (2020). Band gaps of crystalline solids from Wannier-localization based optimal tuning of a screened range-separated hybrid functional. arXiv.10.1073/pnas.2104556118 ↗
18. Koopmans-compliant screened exchange potential with correct asymptotic behavior for semiconductors10.1103/PhysRevB.102.235168 ↗
19. Accurate Density Functional with Correct Formal Properties: A Step Beyond the Generalized Gradient Approximation10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.2544 ↗
20. Strongly constrained and appropriately normed semilocal density functional10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.036402 ↗
21. Energetics of MnO2 polymorphs in density functional theory10.1103/PhysRevB.93.045132 ↗
22. Comparison of approximations in density functional theory calculations: Energetics and structure of binary oxides10.1103/PhysRevB.96.094102 ↗
23. Assessing the SCAN functional for itinerant electron ferromagnets10.1103/PhysRevB.98.094413 ↗
24. Shortcomings of meta-GGA functionals when describing magnetism10.1103/PhysRevB.102.024407 ↗
25. Koopmans’ condition for density-functional theory10.1103/PhysRevB.82.115121 ↗
26. Bridging density-functional and many-body perturbation theory: Orbital-density dependence in electronic-structure functionals10.1103/PhysRevB.89.195134 ↗
27. Koopmans-compliant functionals and their performance against reference molecular data10.1103/PhysRevB.90.075135 ↗
28. Koopmans-compliant spectral functionals for extended systems
29. Koopmans-Compliant Functionals and Potentials and Their Application to the GW100 Test Set10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00976 ↗
30. Marzari, N. (2021). Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. Private communication.
31. Band theory and Mott insulators: Hubbard U instead of Stoner I10.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
32. First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: The LDA+U method10.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002 ↗
33. Electron-energy-loss spectra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study10.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
34. Linear response approach to the calculation of the effective interaction parameters in the LDA+U method10.1103/PhysRevB.71.035105 ↗
35. Extended DFT+U+V method with on-site and inter-site electronic interactions10.1088/0953-8984/22/5/055602 ↗
36. Self-consistent DFT+U+V study of oxygen vacancies in SrTiO310.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.023313 ↗
37. Electronic structure of Ni-substituted LaFeO3 from near edge X-ray absorption fine structure experiments and first-principles simulations10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033265 ↗
38. Self-consistent Hubbard parameters from density-functional perturbation theory in the ultrasoft and projector-augmented wave formulations10.1103/PhysRevB.103.045141 ↗
39. Energetics and cathode voltages of LiMPO4 olivines (M = Fe, Mn) from extended Hubbard functionals10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.3.033801 ↗
40. Parameter-free hybridlike functional based on an extended Hubbard model: DFT+U+V10.1103/PhysRevB.102.155117 ↗
41. First-principles approach with a pseudohybrid density functional for extended Hubbard interactions10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043410 ↗
42. Density functionals from many-body perturbation theory: The band gap for semiconductors and insulators10.1063/1.2189226 ↗
43. New method for calculating the one-particle Green’s function with application to the electron-gas problem10.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 ↗
44. Unified description of ground and excited states of finite systems: The self-consistent GW approach10.1103/PhysRevB.86.081102 ↗
45. Beyond the GW approximation: A second-order screened exchange correction10.1103/PhysRevB.92.081104 ↗
46. Benchmark of GW approaches for the GW100 test set10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00774 ↗
47. Hubbard model in infinite dimensions10.1103/PhysRevB.45.6479 ↗
48. Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13 ↗
49. First-principles calculations of the electronic structure and spectra of strongly correlated systems: Dynamical mean-field theory10.1088/0953-8984/9/35/010 ↗
50. Ab initio calculations of quasiparticle band structure in correlated systems: LDA++ approach10.1103/PhysRevB.57.6884 ↗
51. Electronic structure calculations with dynamical mean-field theory10.1103/RevModPhys.78.865 ↗
52. Understanding band gaps of solids in generalized Kohn-Sham Theory10.1073/pnas.1621352114 ↗
53. Semiconducting and optical properties of selected binary compounds by linear response DFT+U and hybrid functional methods10.1007/s00214-016-1833-9 ↗
54. Effect of chalcogen atoms on the electronic band gaps of donor-acceptor-donor type semiconducting polymers: A systematic DFT investigation10.1007/s00894-019-4043-2 ↗
55. First-principles calculation of the O vacancy in ZnO: A self-consistent gap-corrected approach10.1103/PhysRevB.77.205202 ↗
56. Electronic structure, structural and optical properties of thermally evaporated CdTe thin films10.1016/j.physb.2006.04.008 ↗
57. Evaluating transistion metal oxides within DFT-SCAN and SCAN+U frameworks for solar thermochemical applications10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.095401 ↗
58. Evaluating optimal U for 3d transition-metal oxides within the SCAN+U framework10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.4.045401 ↗
59. Ground states of condensed systems: Application to cerium impurities10.1103/PhysRevLett.53.2512 ↗
60. Calculated Hamiltonian for La2CuO4 and solution in the impurity Anderson approximation10.1103/PhysRevB.38.6650 ↗
61. Density-functional calculation of the parameters in the Anderson model: Application to Mn in CdTe10.1103/PhysRevB.39.1708 ↗
62. Calculation of Coulomb-interaction parameters for La2CuO4 using a constrained-density-functional approach10.1103/PhysRevB.39.9028 ↗
63. Calculations of parameters in model Hamiltonians10.1103/PhysRevB.41.514 ↗
64. Reformation of the LDA+U method for a local-orbital basis10.1103/PhysRevB.58.1201 ↗
65. Screening of Coulomb interactions in transition metals10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045103 ↗
66. First-principles calculation of effective onsite Coulomb interactions of 3d transition metals: Constrained local density functional approach with maximally localized Wannier functions10.1103/PhysRevB.74.235113 ↗
67. Self-consistent parametrization of DFT+U framework using linear response approach: Application to evaluation of redox potentials of battery cathodes10.1103/PhysRevB.93.085135 ↗
68. Frequency-dependent screened interaction in Ni within the random-phase approximation10.1103/PhysRevB.57.4364 ↗
69. Ab initio random-phase-approximation calculation of the frequency-dependent effective interaction between 3d electrons: Ni, Fe, and MnO10.1088/0953-8984/12/11/307 ↗
70. Frequency-dependent local interactions and low-energy effective models from electronic structure calculations10.1103/PhysRevB.70.195104 ↗
71. Calculations of Hubbard U from first-principles10.1103/PhysRevB.74.125106 ↗
72. Effective Coulomb interaction in transition metals from constrained random-phase approximation10.1103/PhysRevB.83.121101 ↗
73. Hubbard U and Hund exchange J in transition metal oxides: Screening versus localization trends from constrained random phase approximation10.1103/PhysRevB.86.165105 ↗
74. Screened Coulomb interaction calculations: cRPA implementation and applications to dynamical screening and self-consistency in uranium dioxide and cerium10.1103/PhysRevB.89.125110 ↗
75. Abinitio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT+U calculations10.1103/PhysRevB.76.155123 ↗
76. Rotationally invariant ab initio evaluation of Coulomb and exchange parameters for DFT+U calculations10.1063/1.2943142 ↗
77. LSDA+U method: A calculation of the U values at the Hartree-Fock level of approximation10.1103/PhysRevB.81.245103 ↗
78. Reformation of DFT+U as a pseudohybird density functional for accelerated materials discovery
79. Hubbard parameters from density-functional perturbation theory10.1103/PhysRevB.98.085127 ↗
80. Representations of the occupation number matrix on the LDA/GGA+U method10.1088/0953-8984/20/32/325205 ↗
81. γ and β cerium: LDA+U calculations of ground-state parameters10.1103/PhysRevB.77.155104 ↗
82. Self-consistent site-dependent DFT+U study of stoichiometric and defective SrMnO310.1103/PhysRevB.99.094102 ↗
83. Hubbard-corrected density functional perturbation theory with ultrasoft pseudopotentials10.1103/PhysRevB.101.064305 ↗
84. Pulay forces in density-functional theory with extended Hubbard functionals: From nonorthogonalized to orthogonalized manifolds10.1103/PhysRevB.102.235159 ↗
85. Projector self-consistent DFT+U using nonorthogonal generalized Wannier functions10.1103/PhysRevB.82.081102 ↗
86. Electronic correlations and crystal structure distortions in BaBiO310.1088/0953-8984/24/41/415603 ↗
87. Implementation of the LDA+U method using the full-potential linearized augmented plane-wave basis10.1103/PhysRevB.60.10763 ↗
88. Implementation of the projector augmented-wave LDA+U method: Application to the electronic structure of NiO10.1103/PhysRevB.62.16392 ↗
89. Electronic correlation effects in transition-metal sulfides10.1088/0953-8984/15/6/325 ↗
90. The local projection in the density functional theory plus U approach: A critical assessment10.1063/1.4945608 ↗
91. Density Functional Theory in transition-metal chemistry: A self-consistent Hubbard U approach10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.103001 ↗
92. A self-consistent Hubbard U density-functional theory approach to the addition-elimination reactions of hydrocarbons on bare FeO+10.1063/1.2987444 ↗
93. Machine learning the Hubbard U parameter in DFT+U using Bayesian optimization10.1038/s41524-020-00446-9 ↗
94. Systematic study of first-row transition-metal diatomic molecules: A self-consistent DFT+U approach10.1063/1.3489110 ↗
95. On the non-orthogonality problem connected with the use of atomic wave functions in the theory of molecules and crystals10.1063/1.1747632 ↗
96. Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential10.1063/1.1564060 ↗
97. Erratum: “Hybrid functionals based on a screened Coulomb potential” [J. Chem. Phys. 118, 8207 (2003)]10.1063/1.2204597 ↗
98. Xiong, Y., Campbell, Q., Fanghanel, J., Badding, C., Wang, H., Kirchner-Hall, N., Theibault, M., Timrov, I., Mondschein, J., and Seth, K. (2021). Optimizing accuracy and efficacy in data-driven materials discovery for the solar production of hydrogen. arXiv.10.1039/D0EE02984J ↗
99. First principles high throughput screening of oxynitrides for water-splitting photocatalysts10.1039/C2EE23482C ↗
100. High-throughput screening of chalcogenide single perovskites by first-principles calculations for photovoltaics10.1088/1361-6463/aae1ee ↗