journal article·2026-08

Improved physical properties of graphene oxide doped with NaHCO3 obtained by laser ablation from lemon and banana peels for implementation in optoelectronic devices

Francisco Severiano Carrillo, Abdú Orduña Díaz, Marlon Rojas López, Mario Moreno Moreno, Oscar Secundino Sánchez, Míriam Carolina Mendoza Ramírez, Javier Flores Méndez

Applied Physics A· Volume 132· Issue 8
Publisher page

Abstract

No abstract is available for this record. The assistant can identify its topic from the title, but cannot infer the study’s results.

Source: Not provided · Quality: missing

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Laser-Ablation Synthesis of Nanoparticles · Graphene research and applications · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. A.S. Gadtya, D. Tripathy, L. Rout, S. Moharana, Graphene Oxide, It’s Surface Functionalisation, Preparation and Properties of Polymer-Based Composites: A Review. Compos. Interfaces. 31(14), 29–76 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1080/09276440.2023.222959410.1080/09276440.2023.2229594 ↗
2. W. Zhang, R. Singh, Z. Wang, G. Li, Y. Xie, R. Jha, C. Marques, B. Zhang, S. Kumar, Humanoid Shaped Optical Fiber Plasmon Biosensor Functionalized with Graphene Oxide/Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Histamine Detection. Opt. Express. 31(7), 11788–11803 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.48684410.1364/OE.486844 ↗
3. S. Hussain, D. Vikraman, Z. Ali Sheikh, M. Taqi Mehran, F. Shahzad, K. Mujasam Batoo, H.S. Kim, D.K. Kim, M. Ali, J. Jung, WS2-Embedded MXene/GO Hybrid Nanosheets as Electrodes for Asymmetric Supercapacitors and Hydrogen Evolution Reactions. Chem. Eng. J. 452, 139523 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.13952310.1016/j.cej.2022.139523 ↗
4. Y. Shi, H. Wang, G. Song, Y. Zhang, L. Tong, Y. Sun, G. Ding, Magnetic Graphene Oxide for Methylene Blue Removal: Adsorption Performance and Comparison of Regeneration Methods. Environ. Sci. Pollut Res. 29(20), 30774–30789 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17654-510.1007/s11356-021-17654-5 ↗
5. M. Afifi, M.E. El-Naggar, S. Muhammad, N. Alghamdi, S. Wageh, M.F. Abou Taleb, M.S. Mostafa, S. Salem, I. El-Tantawy, Compositional Adjusting and Antibacterial Improvement of Hydroxyapatite/Nb2O5/Graphene Oxide for Medical Applications. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 32(6), 2160–2172 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10904-022-02266-410.1007/s10904-022-02266-4 ↗
6. S. Gutić, A.S. Dobrota, N. Gavrilov, M. Baljozović, I.A. Pašti, S.V. Mentus, Surface Charge Storage Properties of Selected Graphene Samples in pH-neutral Aqueous Solutions of Alkali Metal Chlorides - Particularities and Universalities. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 11(10), 8662–8682 (2016). https://doi.org/10.20964/2016.10.4710.20964/2016.10.47 ↗
7. F.Y. Ban, S.R. Majid, N.M. Huang, H.N. Lim, Graphene Oxide and Its Electrochemical Performance. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7(5), 4345–4351 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)19543-510.1016/S1452-3981(23)19543-5 ↗
8. O. Mrózek, L. Melounkovác, D. Smržová, A. Machálková, J. Vinklárek, Z. Němečková, B. Komárková, P. Ecorchard, Salt-washed graphene oxide and its cytotoxicity. J. Hazard. Mater. 5(398), 123114 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.12311410.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123114 ↗
9. A.A. Menazea, I.S. Elashmawi, Structural, optical, and dielectric properties of PVDF/PVA polymer nanocomposites doped with MgO and CdO nanoparticles synthesized via pulsed laser ablation. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 20(1), 2625554 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1080/16583655.2026.262555410.1080/16583655.2026.2625554 ↗
10. I.S. Elashmawi, A.A. Menazea, Influence of laser ablation preparation of MgO and Bi2O3 nanoparticles on the optical and dielectric behavior of the PVA/PEO polymer blend. RSC Adv. 15, 48325–48336 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ra08147e10.1039/d5ra08147e ↗
11. N.J. Mohammed, Z.S. Rasheed, A.S. Hassan, Improvement optical properties of PVA/TiO2 and PVA/ZnO nanocomposites. Al-Mustansiriyah J. Sci. 29(3), 118–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.23851/mjs.v29i3.62910.23851/mjs.v29i3.629 ↗
12. Z. Zhang, L. Wei, X. Qin, Y. Lin, Carbon nanomaterials for photovoltaic process. Nano Energy. 15, 490–522 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.04.00310.1016/j.nanoen.2015.04.003 ↗
13. A. De Giacomo, M. Dell’Aglio, A. Santagata, R. Gaudiuso, O. De Pascale, P. Wagener, G.C. Messina, G. Compagnini, S. Barcikowski, Cavitation dynamics of laser ablation of bulk and wire-shaped metals in water during nanoparticles production. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 3083–3092 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp42649h10.1039/c2cp42649h ↗
14. C. Jian-Hao, W.G. Cullen, C. Jang, M.S. Fuhrer, E.D. Williams, Defect scattering in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 236805 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.23680510.1103/PhysRevLett.102.236805 ↗
15. Š. Abdić, M. Memić, E. Šehović, J. Sulejmanović, S. Begic, Adsorptive removal of eight heavy metals from aqueous solution by unmodified and modified agricultural waste: tangerine peel. IJEST. 15(1), 2511–2518 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-018-1645-710.1007/s13762-018-1645-7 ↗
16. P. Teymouri, M. Ahmadi, A.A. Babaei, K. Ahmadi, N. Jaafarzadeh, Biosorption studies on NaCl modified ceratophyllum demersum: removal of toxic chromium from aqueous solution. Chem. Eng. Comm. 200, 1394–1413 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/00986445.2012.74474810.1080/00986445.2012.744748 ↗
17. G.T.T. Le, J. Manyam, P. Opaprakasit, N. Chanlek, N. Grisdanurak, P. Sreearunothai, Divergent Mechanisms for Thermal Reduction of Graphene Oxide and their Highly Different Ion Affinities. Diam. Relat. Mater. 89, 246–256 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2018.09.00610.1016/j.diamond.2018.09.006 ↗
18. S. Kamsonlian, S. Suresh, C.B. Majumder, S. Chand, Characterization of banana and orange peels: biosorption mechanism. IJSTM. 2, 7 (2011). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228325735_CHARACTERIZATION_OF_BANANA_AND_ORANGE_PEELSBIOSORPTION_MECHANISM
19. V. Krstić, T. Urošević, M. Uđilanović, A. Ćirić, S. Milić, Chap. 20 - Sorbent based on citrus peel waste for wastewater treatment, MNT. 455–478 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90912-9.00020-410.1016/B978-0-323-90912-9.00020-4 ↗
20. R. Faverzani Magnago, K. Zepon, I. Fagundes Valezan, T. Andressa Walber, M. Souza Souza, J. Zanco, H. Regina Turatti Silva, P. Egert, E. Girotto, D. Consoni, S. Perroni Mazon, A. Paula Piovezan, A. Yula Tutida, Alberto Kanis, Antimicrobial activity and cellulose acetate membrane characterization with tangerine peel extract (Citrus reticulata) for bio packing. Ci e Nat. 42, 1–19 (2020). https://doi.org/10.5902/2179460X41464. ISSN 2179-460X10.5902/2179460X41464 ↗
21. F. Severiano-Carrillo, A. Orduña-Díaz, O. Zaca-Moran, O. Secundino-Sánchez, J. Flores-Méndez, J.A. Guillen-Cervantes, Study of properties of graphene oxide nanoparticles obtained by laser ablation from banana, mango, and tangerine peels. NTS. 9, 100091 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwnano.2025.10009110.1016/j.nwnano.2025.100091 ↗
22. C.R. Parvathy, P.K. Praseetha, Evaluation of anti-diabetic potential of antimicrobial carbon quantum dots from Vitis vinifera seeds. Nano Biomed. Eng. 15(1), 28–35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.26599/NBE.2023.929000210.26599/NBE.2023.9290002 ↗
23. S. Sudesh, N. Kumar, S. Das, C. Bernhard, G.D. Varma, Effect of graphene oxide doping on superconducting properties of bulk MgB2. Supercond Sci. Technol. 26(9), 095008 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/26/9/09500810.1088/0953-2048/26/9/095008 ↗
24. A.C. Ferrari, D.M. Basko, Raman spectroscopy as a versatile tool for studying the properties of graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8(4), 235–246 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2013.4610.1038/nnano.2013.46 ↗
25. C. Castiglioni, F. Negri, M. Rigolio, G. Zerbi, Raman activation in disordered graphites of the A1 symmetry forbidden kǂ0 phonon: The origin of the D line. J. Chem. Phys. 115, 3769–3778 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.138152910.1063/1.1381529 ↗
26. M.K. Rabchinskii, A.T. Dideikin, D.A. Kirilenko, M.V. Baidakova, V.V. Shnitov, F. Roth, S.V. Konyakhin, N.A. Besedina, S.I. Pavlov, R.A. Kuricyn, N.M. Lebedeva, P.N. Brunkov, A.Y. Vu, Facile reduction of graphene oxide suspensions and films using glass wafers. Sci. Rep. 8, 14154 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32488-x10.1038/s41598-018-32488-x ↗
27. D.R. Dreyer, S. Park, C.W. Bielawski, R.S. Ruoff, The chemistry of graphene oxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 39(1), 228–240 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/B917103G10.1039/B917103G ↗
28. S. Wang, Y. Dong, C. He, Y. Gao, N. Jia, Z. Chen, W. Song, The role of sp2/sp3 hybrid carbon regulation in the nonlinear optical properties of graphene oxide materials. RSC Adv. 7, 53643 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra10505c10.1039/c7ra10505c ↗
29. F. Gunes, G.H. han, H.-J. Shin, S.Y. Lee, M. Jin, D.L. Duong, S.J. Chae, E.S. Kim, F. Yao, A. Benayad, J.-Y. Choi, Y.H. Lee, Uv-light-assisted oxidative sp3 hybridization of graphene. NANO. 6(5), 409–418 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1142/S179329201100278010.1142/S1793292011002780 ↗
30. W. Wang, Q. Peng, Y. Dai, Z. Qian, S. Liu, Temperature dependence of Raman spectra of graphene on copper foil substrate. J. Mater. Sci. : Mater. Electron. 27, 3888–3893 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-4238-y10.1007/s10854-015-4238-y ↗
31. A.C. Ferrari, Raman spectroscopy of graphene and graphite: Disorder, electron–phonon coupling, doping and nonadiabatic effects. Solid State Commun. 143, 47–57 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.05210.1016/j.ssc.2007.03.052 ↗
32. L.G. Cancado, A. Jorio, R.H. Martins Perreira, F. Stavale, C.A. Achete, R.B.-. Capaz, M.V.O. Moutinho, A. Lombardo, T.S. Kumala, A.C. Ferrari, Quantifying defects in graphene via Raman spectroscopy at different excitation energies. Nano Lett. 11(8), 3190–3196 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201432g10.1021/nl201432g ↗
33. M. Bruna, A.K. Ott, M. Ijas, D. Yoon, U. Sassi, A.C. Ferrari, Doping dependence of the Raman spectrum of defected graphene. ACS Nano. 8(7), 7432–7441 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn502676g10.1021/nn502676g ↗
34. R. Siburian, H. Sihotang, S. Lumban Raja, M. Supeno, C. Simanjuntak, New Route to Synthesize of Graphene Nano Sheets. Orient. J. Chem. 34(1), 182–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.13005/ojc/34012010.13005/ojc/340120 ↗
35. M. Yoo, S.J. Han, J.H. Wee, Carbon dioxide capture capacity of sodium hydroxide aqueous solution. J. Environ. Manage. 15(114), 512–519 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.06110.1016/j.jenvman.2012.10.061 ↗
36. M.H. Masood, N. Haleem, I. Shakeel, Y. Jamal, Carbon dioxide conversion into the reaction intermediate sodium formate for the synthesis of formic acid. Res. Chem. Intermed. 46, 5165–5180 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11164-020-04255-z10.1007/s11164-020-04255-z ↗
37. R.Y. Chan, Y.Z. Zeng, C.C. Hou, H.C. Kou, H.W. Huang, Experimental study of carbon dioxide capture and mineral carbonation using sodium hydroxide solution. J. Ecol. Eng. 26(1), 30–45 (2025). https://doi.org/10.12911/22998993/19521410.12911/22998993/195214 ↗
38. S. Tao, Y. Song, S. Zhu, J. Shoa, B. Yang, A new type of polymer carbon dots with high quantum yield: from synthesis to investigation on fluorescence mechanism. Polymer. 116, 472–478 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.03910.1016/j.polymer.2017.02.039 ↗
39. V. Srinivasan, M.A. Jhonsi, M. Kathiresan, A. Kathiravan, Nanostructured graphene oxide dots: synthesis, characterization, photoinduced electron transfer studies, and detection oi explosives/biomolecules. ACS Omega. 3(8), 9096–9104 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b0118010.1021/acsomega.8b01180 ↗
40. S.D. Choudhury, J.M. Chethodil, P.M. Gharat, P.K. Praseetha, H. Pal, pH-Elicited Luminescence Functionalities of Carbon Dots: Mechanistic Insights. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 8(7), 1389–1395 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b0015310.1021/acs.jpclett.7b00153 ↗
41. A.A. Minea, A review on electrical conductivity of nanoparticle-enhanced fluids. Nanomater. 9(11), 1592 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano911159210.3390/nano9111592 ↗
42. A. Ijam, R. Saidur, P. Ganesan, A. Moradi Golsheikh, Stability, thermo-physical properties, and electrical conductivity of graphene oxide-deionized ter/ethylene glycol based nanofluid. Int. J. Heat. Mass. Transf. 87, 92–103 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.06010.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.02.060 ↗
43. M. Hadadian, E.K. Goharshadi, A. Youssefi, Electrical conductivity, thermal conductivity, and rheological properties of graphene oxide-based nanofluids. J. Nanopart. Res. 16(12), 2788 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-014-2788-110.1007/s11051-014-2788-1 ↗
44. T.T. Baby, S. Ramaprabhu, Investigation of thermal and electrical conductivity of graphene based nanofluids. J. Appl. Phys. 108(12), 124308 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.351628910.1063/1.3516289 ↗