Optimizing phase formation of CMR perovskite La₀.₆₇Sr₀.₃₃MnO₃ through grinding time
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract The structure and magnetic characteristics of La₀.₆₇Sr₀.₃₃MnO₃ (LSMO) materials were investigated to evaluate the impact of two mechanical grinding times (MGT) on phase formation. The first type of mechanical grinding is soft grinding via ball milling, while the other is hard grinding through disc milling, with varying grinding durations for each method. The dominant phase of strontium-doped lanthanum manganite, exhibiting colossal magneto-resistance and a hexagonal structure, R 3c space group, was produced via solid-state reaction at 900 °C for 6 h, employing both soft and hard mechanical grinding techniques. Hard grinding yielded the pure phase after 5 min at MGT/200°C, whereas soft grinding required 120 min to achieve the same result. The grain size of the prepared sample was determined to be around 100–180 nm by XRD, with SEM/EDX analysis confirming the morphological and compositional purity of the synthesized phase. By regulating the grain size of the produced samples, subsequent research will focus on utilizing LSMO as an active layer in manufacturing perovskite solar-cell devices.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Advancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells · Inorganic Chemistry and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. A.P. Ramirez., J. Phys. : Condens. Matter. 9, 8171 (1997)
2. N. Zurauskiene, V. Stankevic, S. Kersulis, M. Vagner, V. Plausinaitiene, J. Dobilas et al., Sensors. 22, 4004 (2022)10.3390/s22114004 ↗
3. J. Li, L. Wu, M. Ma, R. Song, C. Dong, J. Wei, J. Li, X. Wang, M. Li, Curr. Appl. Phys. 46, 21 (2023)10.1016/j.cap.2022.11.013 ↗
4. Z. Xu, L. Yu, Y. Wu, C. Dong, N. Deng, X. Xu, J. Miao, Y Jiang Sci. Rep. 5, 10409 (2015)10.1038/srep10409 ↗
5. W. Xia, Z. Pei, K. Leng, X. Zhu, Nanoscale Res. Lett. 15, 9 (2020)10.1186/s11671-019-3243-0 ↗
6. S. Aruna, K. Patil., J. Mater. Chem. 7, 2499 (1997)10.1039/a703901h ↗
7. J. Deng, L. Zhang, H. Dai, H. He, C T Au Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 47, 8175 (2008)10.1021/ie800585x ↗
8. D. Panthi, B. Choi, A. Tsutsumi, J. Appl. Electrochem. 42, 953 (2012)10.1007/s10800-012-0462-9 ↗
9. D. Grossin, J. G Noudem Solid State Sci. 6, 939 (2004)10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2004.06.003 ↗
10. V. Ravi, S.D. Kulkarni, V. Samuel, S.N. Kale, J. Mona, R. Rajgopal, A. Daundkar, P.S. Lahoti, R S Joshee Ceram. Int. 33, 1129 (2007)10.1016/j.ceramint.2006.02.008 ↗
11. C.O. Ehi-Eromosele, B.I. Ita, E.E.J. Iweala, K.O. Ogunniran, J.A. Adekoya, F.E. Ehi-Eromosele, Ceram. Int. 42, 636 (2016)10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.08.158 ↗
12. F.R. Afje, M.H. Ehsani, Mater. Res. Express. 5, 045012 (2018)10.1088/2053-1591/aaba51 ↗
13. T. Rodriguez-Carvajal, Juan, Roisnel, Proceedings of the satellite meeting on powder diffraction. Vol. 127. (1998)
14. P. Pourghahramani, Effects of Grinding Variables on Structural Changes and Energy Conversion during Mechanical Activation Using Line Profile Analysis (LPA) (Diss. Luleå Tekniska Universitet, 2006)
15. T. Yu, N. Hansen, X. Huang, A. Godfrey, Proc. Risø Int. Symp. Mater. Sci. 35: p. 493, (2014)
16. H.F. Li, Y. Su, Y.G. Xiao, J. Persson, P. Meuffels, T. Brückel, Eur. Phys. J. B 67, 149 (2009)10.1140/epjb/e2009-00019-5 ↗
17. J.M.D. Coey, Magnetism and Magnetic Materials (Cambridge University Press, 2010)
18. S.G. Kwon, A.Y. Park, K.A. Jeon, N.-H. Cho, Y.-H. Choa, J.-P. Ahn, Size-Dependent magnetic properties of ferromagnetic nanoparticles in the Single-Domain region. J. Appl. Phys. 115(17), 17B501 (2014)10.1063/1.4861556 ↗
19. R.H. Victora, Predicted magnetic properties of nanostructured materials. Phys. Rev. B 66(21), 214405 (2002)10.1103/PhysRevB.66.214405 ↗
20. H. Kronmüller, M. Fähnle, Micromagnetism and the Microstructure of Ferromagnetic Solids (Cambridge University Press, 2003)
21. G.H. Jonker, J. H Van Santen Phys. 16(3), 337–349 (1950)
22. C. Zener, Phys. Rev. 81(3), 440 (1951)10.1103/PhysRev.81.440 ↗
23. C. Zener, Phys. Rev. 82(3), 403 (1951)10.1103/PhysRev.82.403 ↗
24. C. Zener, Phys. Rev. 83(2), 299 (1951)10.1103/PhysRev.83.299 ↗
25. M. Ziese, Extrinsic magnetotransport phenomena in ferromagnetic oxides, Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 65, no. 2, p. 143, 200210.1088/0034-4885/65/2/202 ↗
26. H.Y. Hwang, S.-W. Cheong, P.G. Radaelli, M. Marezio, B. Batlogg, Lattice effects on the magnetoresistance in doped LaMnO₃. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75(5), 914–917 (1995)10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.914 ↗
27. J.Z. Sun, W.J. Gallagher, P.R. Duncombe, L. Krusin-Elbaum, R.A. Altman, A. Gupta, Y. Lu, G.Q. Gong, G. Xiao, Improved intergranular connectivity and magnetoresistance in nano-structured La₀.₆₇Sr₀.₃₃MnO₃. J. Appl. Phys. 89(11), 6671–6673 (2001)10.1063/1.1355319 ↗
28. A. Gupta, T.R. McGuire, P.R. Duncombe, M. Rupp, J.Z. Sun, W.J. Gallagher, G. Xiao, Grain-boundary effects on the magnetoresistance properties of perovskite manganite films. Phys. Rev. B, 54, 22, pp. R15629-R15632, 199610.1103/PhysRevB.54.R15629 ↗
29. J.M.D. Coey, M. Viret, L. Ranno, K. Ounadjela, Magnetoresistance of perovskite-type manganites: role of grain boundaries and interfaces. Philos. Mag. B 80(3), 421–432 (2000)10.1080/13642810008208601 ↗