journal article·2014-03

Near-Threshold CNTFET SRAM Cell Design With Word-Line Boosting and Removed Metallic CNT Tolerance

Zhe Zhang, Jose G. Delgado-Frias

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, we report an in-depth study of power supply reduction toward near threshold for an eight-transistor carbon nanotube (CNT) field-effect transistors SRAM cell. Near-threshold voltage has an impact on delays, energy, energy-delay product, leakage current, and static noise margin. In addition, we have incorporated a removed metallic CNT approach to deal with nonsemiconductor CNTs. Monte Carlo simulations at V dd (power supply voltage) of 0.4 V have shown that 97.24% of the cells are functional after removing the metallic CNTs. The power saving is over 5× and the average delay is increased by 3.5× as compared to a typical V dd of 0.9 V. To further improve yield and performance, a word-line boosting technique is explored. Read and write word lines are boosted with additional 100 mV; this in turn effectively eliminates all the write failures at the 0.4 V level and reduces read and write delays. Comparing boosted and nonboosted cells with V dd = 0.4 V, the boosted cell has write and read delays that are faster by 3.8× and 1.7×, respectively. This cell's energy increases by less than 4% per-access in the worst case. The cell with V dd of 0.4 V with boosted word-lines achieves the lowest energy-delay product of all the cases considered in this study, which is 52.3% and 56.9% lower than that of a boosted and nonboosted cell with V dd of 0.9 V, respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Low-power high-performance VLSI design · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Radiation Effects in Electronics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/nnano.2012.18910.1038/nnano.2012.189 ↗
2. 10.1088/0957-4484/20/49/49520210.1088/0957-4484/20/49/495202 ↗
3. Selective etching of metallic carbon nanotubes by gas-phase reaction10.1126/science.1133781 ↗
4. 10.1109/IEDM.2009.542429510.1109/IEDM.2009.5424295 ↗
5. 10.1088/0957-4484/19/29/29520210.1088/0957-4484/19/29/295202 ↗
6. 10.1109/TNANO.2012.219763610.1109/TNANO.2012.2197636 ↗
7. 10.1109/TVLSI.2009.202576610.1109/TVLSI.2009.2025766 ↗
8. 10.1109/JPROC.2009.203476410.1109/JPROC.2009.2034764 ↗
9. 10.1109/ISSCC.2010.543381510.1109/ISSCC.2010.5433815 ↗
10. 10.1109/DATE.2010.545717910.1109/DATE.2010.5457179 ↗
11. 10.1109/MIEL.2002.100315510.1109/MIEL.2002.1003155 ↗
12. 10.1109/VLSIC.2003.122114710.1109/VLSIC.2003.1221147 ↗
13. 10.1109/TED.2007.90188210.1109/TED.2007.901882 ↗
14. 10.1109/JPROC.2003.81833810.1109/JPROC.2003.818338 ↗
15. A metallic-CNT-tolerant carbon nanotube technology using asymmetrically-correlated CNTs (ACCNT)
16. 10.1109/TCAD.2008.200327810.1109/TCAD.2008.2003278 ↗
17. 0
18. 10.1109/ICSICT.2006.30604010.1109/ICSICT.2006.306040 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.68.157910.1103/PhysRevLett.68.1579 ↗
20. Impact of the nanotube diameter on the performance of CNFETs10.1109/DRC.2005.1553137 ↗
21. 10.1109/TED.2007.90904310.1109/TED.2007.909043 ↗
22. 0
23. 10.1109/TED.2007.90903010.1109/TED.2007.909030 ↗