Design Guidelines for Sub-12 nm Nanowire MOSFETs
Source abstract
Abstract
Traditional thinking assumes that a light effective mass (m*), high mobility material will result in better transistor characteristics. However, sub-12-nm metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistors (MOSFETs) with light m* may underperform compared to standard Si, as a result of source to drain (S/D) tunneling. An optimum heavier mass can decrease tunneling leakage current, and at the same time, improve gate to channel capacitance because of an increased quantum capacitance (Cq). A single band effective mass model has been used to provide the performance trends independent of material, orientation and strain. This paper provides guidelines for achieving optimum m* for sub-12-nm nanowire down to channel length of 3 nm. Optimum m* are found to range between 0.2-1.0 m 0 and more interestingly, these masses can be engineered within Si for both p-type and n-type MOSFETs. m* is no longer a material constant, but a geometry and strain dependent property of the channel material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Nanowire Synthesis and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1063/1.482039010.1063/1.4820390 ↗
2. 10.1109/TED.2012.220068810.1109/TED.2012.2200688 ↗
3. On the scaling issues and solutions for double gate MOSFETs at the end of ITRS
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.74.20532310.1103/PhysRevB.74.205323 ↗
5. griffiths · Introduction to Quantum Mechanics · 2004
6. 10.1109/IEDM.2007.441887610.1109/IEDM.2007.4418876 ↗
7. 10.1109/LED.2011.216837710.1109/LED.2011.2168377 ↗
8. 10.1109/LED.2013.227307210.1109/LED.2013.2273072 ↗
9. 10.1109/TED.2013.228539410.1109/TED.2013.2285394 ↗
10. 10.1109/16.98712010.1109/16.987120 ↗
11. 10.1109/TED.2012.219848110.1109/TED.2012.2198481 ↗
12. 0
13. 10.1109/IEDM.2011.613153110.1109/IEDM.2011.6131531 ↗
14. 10.1109/TED.2013.226380610.1109/TED.2013.2263806 ↗
15. Does source-to-drain tunneling limit the ultimate scaling of MOSFETs?
16. 10.1063/1.12678910.1063/1.126789 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.489421710.1063/1.4894217 ↗
18. ETSOI CMOS for system-on-chip applications featuring 22 nm gate length sub-100 nm gate pitch, and 0.08 m2 SRAM cell
19. 10.1109/TED.2012.219312910.1109/TED.2012.2193129 ↗
20. 10.1109/TNANO.2011.216616410.1109/TNANO.2011.2166164 ↗
21. Electrical performances of junctionless-FETs at the scaling limit (LCH = 3 nm)
22. 10.1007/s10825-013-0509-010.1007/s10825-013-0509-0 ↗
23. 10.7567/JJAP.52.04CA0110.7567/JJAP.52.04CA01 ↗