journal article·2017-03

Electrical instability of InGaZnO thin-film transistors with and without titanium sub-oxide layer under light illumination

Y. C. Chiu, Z. W. Zheng, C. H. Cheng, P. C. Chen, S. S. Yen, C. C. Fan, H. H. Hsu, H. L. Kao, C. Y. Chang

Applied Physics A· Volume 123· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

The electrical instability behaviors of amorphous indium-gallium-zinc oxide thin-film transistors with and without titanium sub-oxide passivation layer were investigated under light illumination in this study. For the unpassivated IGZO TFT device, in contrast with the dark case, a noticeable increase of the sub-threshold swing was observed when under the illumination environment, which can be attributed to the generation of ionized oxygen vacancies within the α-IGZO active layer by high energy photons. For the passivated TFT device, the much smaller SS of ~70 mV/dec and high device mobility of >100 cm2/Vs at a drive voltage of 3 V with negligible degradation under light illumination are achieved due to the passivation effect of n-type titanium sub-oxide semiconductor, which may create potential application for high-performance display.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors · Electrical and Thermal Properties of Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. K.M. Chang, W.C. Yang, C.P. Tsai, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 24, 512 (2003)10.1109/LED.2003.815155 ↗
2. C.W. Chen, T.C. Chang, P.T. Liu, H.Y. Lu, K.C. Wang, C.S. Huang, C.C. Lin, T.Y. Tseng, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 26, 731 (2005)10.1109/LED.2005.855405 ↗
3. H.H. Hsu, C.Y. Chang, C.H. Cheng, S.H. Chiou, C.H. Huang, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35, 87 (2014)10.1109/LED.2013.2290707 ↗
4. H.H. Hsu, C.Y. Chang, C.H. Cheng, S.H. Chiou, C.H. Huang, Y.C. Chiu, IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 13, 933 (2014)10.1109/TNANO.2014.2332395 ↗
5. J.H. Kim, U.K. Kim, Y.J. Chung, C.S. Hwang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 232102 (2011)10.1063/1.3597299 ↗
6. X. Huang, C. Wu, H. Lu, F. Ren, Q. Xu, H. Ou, R. Zhang, Y. Zheng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 243505 (2012)10.1063/1.4729478 ↗
7. H. Oh, S.M. Yoon, M.K. Ryu, C.S. Hwang, S. Yang, S.H.K. Park, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 183502 (2010)10.1063/1.3510471 ↗
8. B. Ryu, H.K. Noh, E.A. Choi, K.J. Chang, Appl. Phys. Lett. 97, 022108 (2010)10.1063/1.3464964 ↗
9. P. Barquinha, A.M. Vila, G. Goncalves, L. Pereira, R. Martins, J.R. Morante, E. Fortunato, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 55, 954 (2008)10.1109/TED.2008.916717 ↗
10. M.J. Yu, Y.H. Yeh, C.C. Cheng, C.Y. Lin, G.T. Ho, B.C.M. Lai, C.M. Leu, T.H. Hou, Y.J. Chan, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 47 (2012)10.1109/LED.2011.2170809 ↗
11. H.H. Hsu, C.Y. Chang, C.H. Cheng, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 768 (2013)10.1109/LED.2013.2258455 ↗
12. A. Suresh, P. Wellenius, J.F. Muth, in IEDM Tech. Dig. 587 (2007)10.1109/IEDM.2007.4419007 ↗
13. P.T. Liu, Y.T. Chou, L.F. Teng, F.H. Li, C.S. Fuh, H.D. Shieh, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1397 (2011)10.1109/LED.2011.2163181 ↗
14. T.C. Chen, T.C. Chang, T.Y. Hsieh, W.S. Lu, F.Y. Jian, C.T. Tsai, S.Y. Huang, C.S. Lin. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 022104 (2011)10.1063/1.3609873 ↗
15. L. Li, N. Lu, M. Liu, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35, 226 (2014)10.1109/LED.2013.2291782 ↗
16. Z. Zong, L. Li, J. Jiang, N. Lu, M. Liu, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 215705 (2015)10.1063/1.4922181 ↗
17. W.C. Germs, W.H. Adriaans, A.K. Tripathi, W.S.C. Roelofs, B. Cobb, R.A.J. Janssen, G.H. Gelinck, M. Kemerink, Phys. Rev. B 86, 155319 (2012)10.1103/PhysRevB.86.155319 ↗
18. W. Wang, L. Li, C. Lu, Y. Liu, H. Lv, G. Xu, Z. Ji, M. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 063504 (2015)10.1063/1.4928626 ↗