journal article·2014-12

Energy relaxation of electrons impacts on channel quantization in nano-MOSFETs

Ling-Feng Mao

Applied Physics A· Volume 117· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

The effects of the rising electron temperature due to the energy relaxation on the quantization of the inversion layer in a nano-metal–oxide–semiconductor field transistor (MOSFET) with p-type silicon substrate have been theoretically investigated via self-consistent solution to the coupled Schrodinger equation with considering quantum coupling effects and Poisson equation. The first quantized energy level in the inversion layer rises from 3.6 to 211.4 %, and the total number of the inversion channel electron decreases from 95.7 to 6.5 % relative to those neglecting energy relaxation of channel electrons when the channel electric field increases from 10 to 55 kV/cm. The output characteristic of MOSFET will be largely affected by the energy relaxation when the channel electric field is higher than 10 kV/cm. All these suggest that the energy relaxation of channel electrons should be considered in the modeling of MOSFETs for higher channel electric field.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Quantum and electron transport phenomena

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. E. Pop, Nano Res. 3, 147 (2010)10.1007/s12274-010-1019-z ↗
2. T. Hatakeyama, M. Ishizuka, S. Nakagawa, K. Fushinobu, Trans Jpn Inst Electron Packag 4, 61 (2012)10.5104/jiepeng.4.61 ↗
3. K. Fushinobu, T. Hatakeyama, Trans Jpn Inst Electron Packag 4, 31 (2012)10.5104/jiepeng.4.31 ↗
4. H. Rao, G. Bosman, Solid State Electron. 79, 11 (2013)10.1016/j.sse.2012.06.014 ↗
5. A. Bulusu, D.G. Walker, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 55, 423 (2008)10.1109/TED.2007.910574 ↗
6. T. Hatakeyama, R. Kibushi, M. Ishizuka, in 2nd IEEE CPMT Symposium Japan, 1 (2012)10.1109/ICSJ.2012.6523473 ↗
7. S. Sinha, E. Pop, R.W. Dutton et al., J. Heat Transfer 128, 638 (2006)10.1115/1.2194041 ↗
8. S. Sho, S. Odanaka, J. Comput. Phys. 235, 486 (2013)10.1016/j.jcp.2012.10.051 ↗
9. S.M. Lee, D.G. Cahill, R. Venkatasubramanian, Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2957 (1997)10.1063/1.118755 ↗
10. H. Ramamoorthy, R. Somphonsane, G. He, D.K. Ferry, Y. Ochiai, N. Aoki, J.P. Bird, Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 193115 (2014)10.1063/1.4878535 ↗
11. S.H. Zhang, W. Xu, F.M. Peeters, S.M. Badalyan, Phys. Rev. B 89, 195409 (2014)10.1103/PhysRevB.89.195409 ↗
12. J.Z. Zhang, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 203704 (2014)10.1063/1.4878702 ↗
13. L.F. Mao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 123519 (2007)10.1063/1.2789733 ↗
14. L.F. Mao, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 183511 (2007)10.1063/1.2735929 ↗
15. L.F. Mao, IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 28, 161 (2007)10.1109/LED.2006.889214 ↗
16. L.F. Mao, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 55, 782 (2008)10.1109/TED.2007.914471 ↗
17. L.F. Mao, Solid State Electron. 52, 186 (2008)10.1016/j.sse.2007.11.008 ↗
18. L.F. Mao, ETRI J. 32, 68 (2010)10.4218/etrij.10.0109.0386 ↗
19. R.G. Southwick, J. Reed, C. Buu, et al., IEEE international integrated reliability workshop final report, 48 (2008)
20. S.M. Sze, Physics of Semiconductor Devices, 3rd edn. (Wiley, New York, 2007)
21. I.H. Tan, G.L. Snider, L.D. Chang, E.L. Hu, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 4071 (1990)10.1063/1.346245 ↗
22. G.L. Snider, I.H. Tan, E.L. Hu, J. Appl. Phys. 68, 2849 (1990)10.1063/1.346443 ↗
23. S.C. Brugger, A. Schenk, in IEEE Proceedings of the International Conference on Simulation of Semiconductor Processes and Devices, 151 (2005)10.1109/SISPAD.2005.201495 ↗
24. T. Janik, B. Majkusiak, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 45, 1263 (1998)10.1109/16.678531 ↗
25. K. Nayak, M. Bajaj, A. Konar, P.J. Oldiges, H. Iwai, K.V.R.M. Murali, V.R. Ra, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 04EC16 (2014)10.7567/JJAP.53.04EC16 ↗