Exploring the Design of the Magnetic–Electrical Interface for Nanomagnet Logic
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanomagnet logic (NML) has received increasing attention as an alternative information processing technology given the potential for low energy dissipation, a relatively advanced experimental state of the art, and intangibles such as inherent radiation hardness and nonvolatility. In order to facilitate the integration of NML-based circuits with transistor-based circuits, a magnetic-electrical interface (MEI) is needed. This paper focuses on the output portion of MEI design, i.e., converting signals from the magnetic domain to the electrical domain. The basic idea of an MEI output is to employ fringing fields from an NML device to set the magnetization state of the free layer of a magnetic tunnel junction. A detailed study of four different MEI output designs is presented which considers metrics such as the clock energy required to set the output state, the magnetoresistance ratio, etc. Simulation-based analysis reveals the pros and cons of each design. A design where multiple NML devices (i.e., free layers) share a large synthetic antiferromagnet is most promising based on our simulation-based, quantitative analysis.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic properties of thin films · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 0
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.359810.1103/PhysRevLett.67.3598 ↗
3. 10.1063/1.131563310.1063/1.1315633 ↗
4. 0
5. 0
6. 10.1038/nphys78310.1038/nphys783 ↗
7. 10.1109/TMAG.2008.200149510.1109/TMAG.2008.2001495 ↗
8. 0
9. getzlaff · Magnetism I Fundamentals · 2008 · 1
10. Exchange anisotropy : A review10.1016/S0304-8853(99)00453-9 ↗
11. Magnetic electrical interface for nanomagnet logic10.1109/TNANO.2010.2077645 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.77310.1016/j.jmmm.2006.10.773 ↗
13. 10.1063/1.355891510.1063/1.3558915 ↗
14. 10.1063/1.367217710.1063/1.3672177 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.367361810.1063/1.3673618 ↗
16. 10.1117/12.61397410.1117/12.613974 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.321337110.1063/1.3213371 ↗
18. Majority logic gate for magnetic quantum-dot cellular automata10.1126/science.1120506 ↗
19. 10.1109/DRC.2010.555185210.1109/DRC.2010.5551852 ↗
20. 10.1088/0953-8984/23/49/49320210.1088/0953-8984/23/49/493202 ↗
21. 10.1109/TNANO.2010.205669710.1109/TNANO.2010.2056697 ↗
22. 10.1109/NANOARCH.2010.551092910.1109/NANOARCH.2010.5510929 ↗
23. 10.1145/1899390.189939210.1145/1899390.1899392 ↗
24. Nano-magnet based ultra-low power logic design using non-majority gates
25. 10.1109/NANOARCH.2009.522635810.1109/NANOARCH.2009.5226358 ↗
26. 10.1109/TNANO.2010.205669710.1109/TNANO.2010.2056697 ↗
27. 10.1109/TNANO.2002.100542410.1109/TNANO.2002.1005424 ↗
28. 10.1109/ICCD.2008.475190810.1109/ICCD.2008.4751908 ↗
29. Simulation studies of nanomagnet-based architecture10.1021/nl801607p ↗
30. 0
31. 0
32. 10.1109/TNANO.2012.219644510.1109/TNANO.2012.2196445 ↗
33. Majority logic gate for magnetic quantum-dot cellular automata10.1126/science.1120506 ↗
34. 10.1145/1283780.128378710.1145/1283780.1283787 ↗
35. 10.1109/TNANO.2011.216998310.1109/TNANO.2011.2169983 ↗
36. 10.1109/TNANO.2010.204124810.1109/TNANO.2010.2041248 ↗
37. 10.1038/nmat218410.1038/nmat2184 ↗
38. 0
39. 10.1145/1899390.189939210.1145/1899390.1899392 ↗
40. 0
41. 10.1109/JETCAS.2011.215834410.1109/JETCAS.2011.2158344 ↗