Preconditioned 70S30C bioactive glass foams promote osteogenesis in vivo
Source abstract
Abstract
Bioactive glass scaffolds (70S30C; 70% SiO2 and 30% CaO) produced by a sol-gel foaming process are thought to be suitable matrices for bone tissue regeneration. Previous in vitro data showed bone matrix production and active remodelling in the presence of osteogenic cells. Here we report their ability to act as scaffolds for in vivo bone regeneration in a rat tibial defect model, but only when preconditioned. Pretreatment methods (dry, pre-wetted or preconditioned without blood) for the 70S30C scaffolds were compared against commercial synthetic bone grafts (NovaBone® and Actifuse®). Poor bone ingrowth was found for both dry and wetted sol-gel foams, associated with rapid increase in pH within the scaffolds. Bone ingrowth was quantified through histology and novel micro-CT image analysis. The percentage bone ingrowth into dry, wetted and preconditioned 70S30C scaffolds at 11 weeks were 10±1%, 21±2% and 39±4%, respectively. Only the preconditioned sample showed above 60% material-bone contact, which was similar to that in NovaBone and Actifuse. Unlike the commercial products, preconditioned 70S30C scaffolds degraded and were replaced with new bone. The results suggest that bioactive glass compositions should be redesigned if sol-gel scaffolds are to be used without preconditioning to avoid excess calcium release.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Facial Trauma and Fracture Management · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Composition and mechanical properties of cancellous bone from the femoral head of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.4.641 ↗
2. Birth and death of bone cells: basic regulatory mechanisms and implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of osteoporosis
3. Histomorphometric analysis of the repair of a segmental diaphyseal defect with ceramic and titanium fibermetal implants: effects of bone marrow10.1002/jor.1100120317 ↗
4. Direct bone anchorage of dental implants10.1016/0022-3913(83)90027-6 ↗
5. Tissue response and in vivo degradation of selected polyhydroxyacids: polylactides (PLA), poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB), and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB/VA)10.1002/jbm.820270904 ↗
6. Regeneration of diaphyseal bone defects using resorbable poly(l/dl-lactide) and poly(d-lactide) membranes in the Yucatan pig model10.1097/00005131-199711000-00002 ↗
7. Segmental bone repair by tissue-engineered periosteal cell transplants with bioresorbable fleece and fibrin scaffolds in rabbits10.1016/S0142-9612(99)00280-X ↗
8. Electrospinning biomedical nanocomposite fibers of hydroxyapatite/poly(lactic acid) for bone regeneration10.1002/jbm.a.30866 ↗
9. Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.01.039 ↗
10. Degradation, bioactivity, and osteogenic potential of composites made of PLGA and two different sol–gel bioactive glasses10.1007/s10439-011-0307-4 ↗
11. Hydroxyapatite crystallinity does not affect the repair of critical size bone defects10.1590/S1678-77572011005000007 ↗
12. Effect of silicon level on rate, quality and progression of bone healing within silicate-substituted porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.05.039 ↗
13. Osteoinduction in porous hydroxyapatite implanted in heterotopic sites of different animal models10.1016/0142-9612(96)80752-6 ↗
14. Increasing strut porosity in silicate substituted calcium–phosphate bone graft substitutes enhances osteogenesis10.1002/jbm.b.31807 ↗
15. Biphasic calcium phosphate microparticles for bone formation: benefits of combination with blood clot10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0227 ↗
16. Long-term in vivo bioactivity and degradability of bulk sol–gel bioactive glasses10.1002/1097-4636(20010315)54:4<560::AID-JBM130>3.0.CO;2-J ↗
17. Comparison in in-vivo response between a bioactive glass and a non-bioactive glass10.1023/A:1008912125171 ↗
18. Quantitative comparison of bone growth behavior in granules of Bioglass, A-W glass ceramic, and hydroxyapatite10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(200007)51:1<37::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-T ↗
19. In vivo comparison of bioactive glass particles in rabbits10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00191-5 ↗
20. Silicate-substituted calcium phosphate as a bone void filler after kyphoplasty in a young patient with multiple compression fractures due to osteogenesis imperfecta variant: case report10.3171/foc.2006.21.6.11 ↗
21. Comparative bone growth behavior in granules of bioceramic materials of various sizes10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199901)44:1<31::AID-JBM4>3.0.CO;2-9 ↗
22. 45S5 Bioglass®-derived glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.025 ↗
23. Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.017 ↗
24. Non-destructive quantitative 3D analysis for the optimisation of tissue scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.014 ↗
25. Gene activation by bioactive glasses10.1007/s10856-006-0435-9 ↗
26. Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass–ceramic materials to bone and muscle10.1002/jbm.820070304 ↗
27. Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis10.1006/bbrc.2000.3503 ↗
28. Bioglass 45S5 stimulates osteoblast turnover and enhances bone formation in vitro: implications and applications for bone tissue engineering10.1007/s002230001134 ↗
29. Extracellular matrix formation and mineralization on a phosphate-free porous bioactive glass scaffold using primary human osteoblast (HOB) cells10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.11.022 ↗
30. Bioactive glass stimulates in vitro osteoblast differentiation and creates a favourable template for bone tissue formation10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.231 ↗
31. Sol–gel bioactive glasses support both osteoblast and osteoclast formation from human bone marrow cells10.1002/jbm.a.31386 ↗
32. An investigation of bioactive glass powders by sol–gel processing10.1002/jab.770020403 ↗
33. Preparation of bioactive glass polyvinyl alcohol hybrid foams by the sol–gel method10.1007/s10856-005-4758-8 ↗
34. Three-dimensional printing of hierarchical and tough mesoporous bioactive glass scaffolds with a controllable pore architecture, excellent mechanical strength and mineralization ability10.1016/j.actbio.2011.03.009 ↗
35. Nodule formation and mineralisation of human primary osteoblasts cultured on a porous bioactive glass scaffold10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.07.001 ↗
36. Bioactive glass foam scaffolds are remodelled by osteoclasts and support the formation of mineralized matrix and vascular networks in vitro10.1002/adhm.201200140 ↗
37. Assessment of resorbable bioactive material for grafting of critical-size cancellous defects10.1002/jor.1100180120 ↗
38. Evaluation of 3D nano–macro porous bioactive glass scaffold for hard tissue engineering10.1007/s10856-011-4297-4 ↗
39. Effect of the pore structure of bioactive glass balls on biocompatibility in vitro and in vivo10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.014 ↗
40. Effect of bioactive glass templates on osteoblast proliferation and in vitro synthesis of bone-like tissue10.1002/jcb.240560207 ↗
41. Bioactive material template for in vitro synthesis of bone10.1002/jbm.820290311 ↗
42. Effect of surface reaction stage on fibronectin-mediated adhesion of osteoblast-like cells to bioactive glass10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<48::AID-JBM6>3.0.CO;2-R ↗
43. Analysis of pore interconnectivity in bioactive glass foams using X-ray microtomography10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.08.014 ↗
44. Hierarchical porous materials for tissue engineering10.1098/rsta.2005.1689 ↗
45. Evaluation of 3-D bioactive glass scaffolds dissolution in a perfusion flow system with X-ray microtomography10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.009 ↗
46. Synchrotron X-ray microtomography for assessment of bone tissue scaffolds10.1007/s10856-009-3888-9 ↗
47. The quickhuall algorithm for convex hulls10.1145/235815.235821 ↗
48. Hege HC, Seebass M, Stalling D, Zockler M. A generalized marching cubes algorithm based on non-binary classifications. Technical report, Konrad-Zuse-Zentrum (ZIB):SC; 1997:97–05.
49. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25years of image analysis10.1038/nmeth.2089 ↗
50. Bioactive glasses for in situ tissue regeneration10.1163/156856204323005352 ↗
51. In vitro dissolution of melt-derived 45S5 and sol–gel derived 58S bioactive glasses10.1002/jbm.10207 ↗
52. Third-generation biomedical materials10.1126/science.1067404 ↗
53. Influence of phase purity on the in vivo response to hydroxyapatite10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.192-195.373 ↗
54. Comparative performance of three ceramic bone graft substitutes10.1016/j.spinee.2006.07.017 ↗
55. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01536.x ↗
56. Treatment of high-energy tibial shaft fractures with internal fixation and early prophylactic NovaBone grafting10.1111/j.1757-7861.2008.00004.x ↗
57. Genetic design of bioactive glass10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2008.08.002 ↗
58. Ionic dissolution products of NovaBone promote osteoblastic proliferation via influences on the cell cycle10.1177/147323000903700317 ↗
59. A comparative study on the in vivo behavior of hydroxyapatite and silicon substituted hydroxyapatite granules10.1023/A:1021114710076 ↗
60. In vivo assessment of hydroxyapatite and silicate-substituted hydroxyapatite granules using an ovine defect model10.1007/s10856-005-6983-6 ↗
61. Comparison of in vivo dissolution processes in hydroxyapatite and silicon-substituted hydroxyapatite bioceramics10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00355-7 ↗
62. Comparison of bone substitutes in a tibia defect model in Wistar rats
63. Effects of biosilicate and bioglass 45S5 on tibial bone consolidation on rats: a biomechanical and a histological study10.1007/s10856-009-3824-z ↗