Effect of annealing on contact performance and electrical properties of p-type high purity germanium single crystal
Source abstract
Abstract
Van de Pauw Hall measurement is an effective method to characterize the properties of semiconductors, such as bulk concentration, mobility, and resistivity, all of which are used to describe the purity level in the semiconductors. However, the performance of the ohmic contacts has a direct impact on the reliability and accuracy of the results obtained from the Van de Pauw Hall measurement. In the present work, the influences of different annealing techniques on the performance of the InSn ohmic contacts have been investigated using a High Purity Germanium (HPGe) crystal sample. The results show that the preferred annealing condition is at 400 °C for 1 hour, which has provided a significant improvement of the InSn contact quality and microscopic homogenization of the impurities in the HPGe crystal. The carrier concentration, charge mobility, and resistivity of the sample annealed at 400 °C for 1 hour are 5.772×1010/cm3, 1.883×104× cm2/Vs, and 5.795×103×Ω cm at 77 K, respectively.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Silicon and Solar Cell Technologies · Semiconductor materials and interfaces · Advanced Semiconductor Detectors and Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. B. Depuydt, A. Theuwis, I. Romandic, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 9, 437 (2006)10.1016/j.mssp.2006.08.002 ↗
2. C. Claeys, E. Simoen, Germanium-Based Technologies from Materials to Devices (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2007)
3. E.E. Haller, W.L. Hansen, F.S. Goulding, Adv. Phys. 30, 93 (1981)10.1080/00018738100101357 ↗
4. E.E. Haller, W.L. Hansen, G.S. Hubbard, F.S. Goulding, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-23, 81 (1976)10.1109/TNS.1976.4328219 ↗
5. W.L. Hansen, E.E. Haller, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-21, 251 (1973)
6. R.R. Lieten, S. Degroote, M. Kuijk, G. Borghs, Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 0221061 (2008)10.1063/1.2831918 ↗
7. M. Murakami, Y. Koide, Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci. 23, 1 (1998)10.1080/10408439891324167 ↗
8. R.K. Kupka, W.A. Anderson, J. Appl. Phys. 69, 063623 (1991)10.1063/1.348509 ↗
9. K.P. Pande, E. Martin, D. Gutierrez, O. Aina, Solid-State Electron. 30, 253 (1987)10.1016/0038-1101(87)90180-8 ↗
10. J.H. Lim, K.K. Kim, D.K. Hwang, J. Electrochem. Soc. 152, G179 (2005)
11. R. Wichner, S.P. Swierkowski, G.A. Armantrout, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 21, 273 (1974)10.1109/TNS.1974.4327471 ↗
12. D.K. Schroder, Semiconductor Materials and Devices Characterization (Wiley, New York, 2006)
13. O. Lindberg, Proc. IRE 40, 1414 (1952)10.1109/JRPROC.1952.273972 ↗
14. W.C. Dunlap, Phys. Rev. 79, 286 (1950)10.1103/PhysRev.79.286 ↗
15. M.B. Prince, Phys. Rev. 92, 681 (1953)10.1103/PhysRev.92.681 ↗
16. T. Matsumura, Y. Sato, J. Mod. Phys. 1, 340 (2010)10.4236/jmp.2010.15048 ↗
17. L.J. Van der Pauw, Philips Res. Rep. 13, 1 (1958)
18. C.K. Sumesh, K.D. Patel, V.M. Pathak, R. Srivastava, Chalcogenide Lett. 5, 303 (2008)
19. A. Nathan, W. Allegretto, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 40, 1508 (1993)10.1109/16.223712 ↗
20. D.K. Schroder, Semiconductor Material and Device Characterization (Wiley, New York, 2006)
21. A.K. Singh, Electric Devices and Integrated Circuits (Prentice-Hall of India, Delhi, 2008)
22. IEEE Standard, 1160 (1993)