Einstein relation in chemically doped organic semiconductors
Source abstract
Abstract
Based on the assumption of Gaussian energy distributions of the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) and the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO), analytical expressions of generalized Einstein relation in chemically doped organic semiconductor are developed, by approximation of Coulomb traps with a rectangle potential well. Numerical calculations show that traditional Einstein relations do not hold for chemically doped organic semiconductors. Similar to physical doping, the dependence of diffusion coefficient to mobility D/μ ratio on the carrier concentration has a maximum. An essential difference between chemical doping and physical doping is that, the D/μ ratio in chemically doped organic semiconductors depends not only on carrier concentration and doping concentration, but also on the applied electric field.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Light-Emitting Diodes Research · Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Conducting polymers and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. J. Huang, M. Pfeiffer, A. Werner, Phys. Lett. 80, 139 (2002)
2. J.H. Schön, C. Kloc, E. Bucher, B. Batlogg, Nature (London) 403, 408 (2000)10.1038/35000172 ↗
3. W. Gao, A. Kahn, J. Appl. Phys. 94, 359 (2003)10.1063/1.1577400 ↗
4. V.I. Arkhipov, P. Heremans, E.V. Emelianova, G.J. Adriaenssens, H. Baessler, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3245 (2003)10.1063/1.1572965 ↗
5. B. Maennig, M. Pfeifer, A. Nollau, X. Zhou, K. Leo, Phys. Rev. B 64, 195208 (2001)10.1103/PhysRevB.64.195208 ↗
6. M. van der Auwera, F.C. De Schryver, P.M. Borsenberger, H. Baessler, Adv. Mater. 6, 199 (1994)10.1002/adma.19940060304 ↗
7. G.Y. Zhong, J. He, S.T. Zhang, Z. Xu, Z.H. Xiong, H.Z. Shi, X.M. Ding, W. Huang, X.Y. Hou, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 4846 (2002)10.1063/1.1489083 ↗
8. S. Blumstengel, R. Dorsinville, Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 38, L403 (1999)10.1143/JJAP.38.L403 ↗
9. T. Mori, K. Miyachi, T. Mizutani, J. Phys. D 28, 1461 (1995)10.1088/0022-3727/28/7/027 ↗
10. C.W. Tang, S.A. VanSlyke, C.H. Chen, J. Appl. Phys. 65, 3610 (1989)10.1063/1.343409 ↗
11. J. Huang, J. Blochwitz-Nimoth, M. Pfeifer, K. Leo, J. Appl. Phys. 93, 838 (2003)10.1063/1.1533838 ↗
12. Y. Hamada, N. Matsusue, H. Kanno, H. Fujii, Japan. J. Appl. Phys. 40, L753 (2001)10.1143/JJAP.40.L753 ↗
13. H.-H. Chang, C.-C. Wu, C.-C. Yang, C.-W. Chen, Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 574 (2001)10.1063/1.1344223 ↗
14. C. Adachi, M.A. Baldo, S.R. Forrest, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 904 (2000)10.1063/1.1306639 ↗
15. H. Suzuki, S. Hoshino, J. Appl. Phys. 79, 8816 (1996)10.1063/1.362506 ↗
16. C.-C. Wu, J.C. Sturm, R.A. Register, J. Tian, E.P. Dana, M.E. Thompson, IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 44, 1269 (1997)10.1109/16.605468 ↗
17. C. Xu, Y. Cui, Y. Shen, H. Gu, Y. Pan, Y. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1827 (1999)10.1063/1.124841 ↗
18. R. Richert, L. Pautmeier, H. Baessler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 547 (1989)10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.547 ↗
19. A. Hirao, H. Nishizawa, M. Sugiuchi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1787 (1995)10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1787 ↗
20. Y. Roichman, N. Tessler, Appl. Phys. Lett. 80, 1948 (2002)10.1063/1.1461419 ↗
21. Y.-Q. Peng, J.-H. Yang, C.-A. Song, Appl. Phys. A 83, 305 (2006)10.1007/s00339-006-3488-1 ↗
22. Y.-Q. Peng, S. Sun, C.-A. Song, Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 8, 525 (2005)10.1016/j.mssp.2004.11.001 ↗
23. V.I. Arkhipov, P. Heremans, E.V. Emelianova, G.J. Adriaenssens, H. Baessler, Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3245 (2003)10.1063/1.1572965 ↗
24. V.I. Arkhipov, E.V. Emelianova, P. Heremans, H. Baessler, Phys. Rev. B 72, 235202 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevB.72.235202 ↗
25. V.I. Arkhipov, P. Heremans, E.V. Emelianova, H. Baessler, Phys. Rev. B 71, 045214 (2005)10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045214 ↗