The impact of plasmonic electrodes on the photocarrier extraction of inverted organic bulk heterojunction solar cells
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nano-patterning the semiconducting photoactive layer/back electrode interface of organic photovoltaic devices is a widely accepted approach to enhance the power conversion efficiency through the exploitation of numerous photonic and plasmonic effects. Yet, nano-patterning the semiconductor/metal interface leads to intertwined effects that impact the optical as well as the electrical characteristic of solar cells. In this work we aim to disentangle the optical and electrical effects of a nano-structured semiconductor/metal interface on the device performance. For this, we use an inverted bulk heterojunction P3HT:PCBM solar cell structure, where the nano-patterned photoactive layer/back electrode interface is realized by patterning the active layer with sinusoidal grating profiles bearing a periodicity of 300 nm or 400 nm through imprint lithography while varying the photoactive layer thickness (LPAL) between 90 and 400 nm. The optical and electrical device characteristics of nano-patterned solar cells are compared to the characteristics of control devices, featuring a planar photoactive layer/back electrode interface. We find that patterned solar cells show for an enhanced photocurrent generation for a LPAL above 284 nm, which is not observed when using thinner active layer thicknesses. Simulating the optical characteristic of planar and patterned devices through a finite-difference time-domain approach proves for an increased light absorption in presence of a patterned electrode interface, originating from the excitation of propagating surface plasmon and dielectric waveguide modes. Evaluation of the external quantum efficiency characteristic and the voltage dependent charge extraction characteristics of fabricated planar and patterned solar cells reveals, however, that the increased photocurrents of patterned devices do not stem from an optical enhancement but from an improved charge carrier extraction efficiency in the space charge limited extraction regime. Presented findings clearly demonstrate that the improved charge extraction efficiency of patterned solar cells is linked to the periodic surface corrugation of the (back) electrode interface.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Organic Electronics and Photovoltaics · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies · Perovskite Materials and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (73)
Show source-provided references
1. M. Riede, D. Spoltore, K. Leo, Organic solar cells—the path to commercial success. Adv Energy Mater. 11(1), 1–10 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20200265310.1002/aenm.202002653 ↗
2. R. Xue, J. Zhang, Y. Li, Y. Li, Organic solar cell materials toward commercialization. Small 14(41), 1–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.20180179310.1002/smll.201801793 ↗
3. F. Yang, Y. Huang, Y. Li, Y. Li, Large-area flexible organic solar cells. npj Flex Electron. 5(1), 1–12 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41528-021-00128-610.1038/s41528-021-00128-6 ↗
4. L. Hong, H. Yao, Y. Cui, Z. Ge, J. Hou, Recent advances in high-efficiency organic solar cells fabricated by eco-compatible solvents at relatively large-area scale. APL Mater. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.002794810.1063/5.0027948 ↗
5. I.C. Ghosekar, G.C. Patil, Review on performance analysis of P3HT:PCBM-based bulk heterojunction organic solar cells. Semicond Sci Technol. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6641/abe21b10.1088/1361-6641/abe21b ↗
6. N. Sadoogi, A. Rostami, B. Faridpak, M. Farrokhifar, Performance analysis of organic solar cells: opto-electrical modeling and simulation. Eng Sci Technol Int J. 24(1), 229–235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jestch.2020.08.00610.1016/j.jestch.2020.08.006 ↗
7. J. Ajayan, D. Nirmal, P. Mohankumar, M. Saravanan, M. Jagadesh, L. Arivazhagan, A review of photovoltaic performance of organic/inorganic solar cells for future renewable and sustainable energy technologies. Superlattices Microstruct. 143, 106549 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spmi.2020.10654910.1016/j.spmi.2020.106549 ↗
8. Y. Zhang, B. Wu, Y. He et al., Layer-by-layer processed binary all-polymer solar cells with efficiency over 16% enabled by finely optimized morphology. Nano Energy 93, 106858 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.10685810.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106858 ↗
9. Q. Liu, Y. Jiang, K. Jin et al., 18% Efficiency organic solar cells. Sci Bull. 65(4), 272–275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2020.01.00110.1016/j.scib.2020.01.001 ↗
10. A.P. Amalathas, M.M. Alkaisi, Nanostructures for light trapping in thin film solar cells. Micromachines. 10(9), 1–18 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/mi1009061910.3390/mi10090619 ↗
11. C.F. Guo, T. Sun, F. Cao, Q. Liu, Z. Ren, Metallic nanostructures for light trapping in energy-harvesting devices. Light Sci Appl. 3(4), e161–e161 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2014.4210.1038/lsa.2014.42 ↗
12. S. Mokkapati, K.R. Catchpole, Nanophotonic light trapping in solar cells. J Appl Phys. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474779510.1063/1.4747795 ↗
13. Z. Yu, A. Raman, S. Fan, Fundamental limit of nanophotonic light trapping in solar cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107(41), 17491–17496 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.100829610710.1073/pnas.1008296107 ↗
14. M. Green, K. Emery, Y. Hishikawa et al., Solar cell efficiency tables (version 40). Ieee Trans Fuzzy Syst. 20(6), 1114–1129 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.103810.1002/pip.1038 ↗
15. C.E. Petoukhoff, Z. Shen, M. Jain, A. Chang, D.M. O’Carroll, Plasmonic electrodes for bulk-heterojunction organic photovoltaics: a review. J Photon. Energy. 5(1), 057002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jpe.5.05700210.1117/1.jpe.5.057002 ↗
16. H.A. Atwater, A. Polman, Plasmonics for improved photovoltaic devices. Nat Mater. 9(3), 205–213 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat262910.1038/nmat2629 ↗
17. S. Ahn, D. Rourke, W. Park, Plasmonic nanostructures for organic photovoltaic devices. J. Opt. (United Kingdom). 18(3), 33001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/2040-8978/18/3/03300110.1088/2040-8978/18/3/033001 ↗
18. Q. Gan, F.J. Bartoli, Z.H. Kafafi, Plasmonic-enhanced organic photovoltaics: breaking the 10% efficiency barrier. Adv Mater. 25(17), 2385–2396 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20120332310.1002/adma.201203323 ↗
19. H. Shen, B. Maes, Combined plasmonic gratings in organic solar cells. Opt Express. 19(S6), A1202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.19.0a120210.1364/oe.19.0a1202 ↗
20. M.A. Sefunc, A.K. Okyay, H.V. Demir, Plasmonic backcontact grating for P3HT:PCBM organic solar cells enabling strong optical absorption increased in all polarizations. Opt Express. 19(15), 14200–14209 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.01420010.1364/OE.19.014200 ↗
21. P. Toan Dang, T.K. Nguyen, K.Q. Le, Revisited design optimization of metallic gratings for plasmonic light-trapping enhancement in thin organic solar cells. Opt Commun. 382, 241–245 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optcom.2016.07.08010.1016/j.optcom.2016.07.080 ↗
22. L. Wen, F. Sun, Q. Chen, Cascading metallic gratings for broadband absorption enhancement in ultrathin plasmonic solar cells. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.487158410.1063/1.4871584 ↗
23. B. Yousif, M.E.A. Abo-Elsoud, H. Marouf, Triangle grating for enhancement the efficiency in thin film photovoltaic solar cells. Opt. Quantum Electron. 51(8), 1–11 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-019-1987-510.1007/s11082-019-1987-5 ↗
24. N.F. Chiu, C.H. Hou, C.J. Cheng, F.Y. Tsai, Plasmonic circular nanostructure for enhanced light absorption in organic solar cells. Int. J. Photoenergy. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/50257610.1155/2013/502576 ↗
25. R. Chriki, A. Yanai, J. Shappir, U. Levy, Enhanced efficiency of thin film solar cells using a shifted dual grating plasmonic structure. Opt Express. 21(S3), A382 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.21.00a38210.1364/oe.21.00a382 ↗
26. Y.G. Bi, J. Feng, Y. Chen et al., Dual-periodic-corrugation-induced broadband light absorption enhancement in organic solar cells. Org Electron. 27, 167–172 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2015.09.02110.1016/j.orgel.2015.09.021 ↗
27. X. Li, W.C.H. Choy, X. Ren, J. Xin, P. Lin, D.C.W. Leung, Polarization-independent efficiency enhancement of organic solar cells by using 3-dimensional plasmonic electrode. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102(15), 153304 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480226110.1063/1.4802261 ↗
28. K. Li, S. Haque, A. Martins et al., Light trapping in solar cells: simple design rules to maximize absorption. Optica. 7(10), 1377 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1364/optica.39488510.1364/optica.394885 ↗
29. C. Wang, S. Yu, W. Chen, C. Sun, Highly efficient light-trapping structure design inspired by natural evolution. Sci. Rep. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0102510.1038/srep01025 ↗
30. I. Khan, H. Keshmiri, F. Kolb, T. Dimopoulos, E.J.W.W. List-Kratochvil, J. Dostalek, Multidiffractive broadband plasmonic absorber. Adv Opt Mater. 4(3), 435–443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.20150050810.1002/adom.201500508 ↗
31. A. Lin, J. Phillips, Optimization of random diffraction gratings in thin-film solar cells using genetic algorithms. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 92(12), 1689–1696 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2008.07.02110.1016/j.solmat.2008.07.021 ↗
32. X.H. Li, W.E.I.I. Sha, W.C.H.H. Choy, D.D.S.S. Fung, F.X. Xie, Efficient inverted polymer solar cells with directly patterned active layer and silver back grating. J. Phys. Chem C. 116(12), 7200–7206 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp211237c10.1021/jp211237c ↗
33. D.H. Wang, J. Seifter, J.H. Park, D.G. Choi, A.J. Heeger, Effi ciency increase in flexible bulk heterojunction solar cells with a nano-patterned indium zinc oxide anode. Adv Energy Mater. 2(11), 1319–1322 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20120034910.1002/aenm.201200349 ↗
34. C.M. Hsu, C. Battaglia, C. Pahud et al., High-efficiency amorphous silicon solar cell on a periodic nanocone back reflector. Adv. Energy Mater. 2(6), 628–633 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20110051410.1002/aenm.201100514 ↗
35. J. Oh, H.C. Yuan, H.M. Branz, An 18.2%-efficient black-silicon solar cell achieved through control of carrier recombination in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7(11), 743–748 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.16610.1038/nnano.2012.166 ↗
36. S.-I.I. Na, S.-S.S. Kim, J. Jo et al., Efficient polymer solar cells with surface relief gratings fabricated by simple soft lithography. Adv. Funct. Mater. 18(24), 3956–3963 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20080068310.1002/adfm.200800683 ↗
37. Y. Liu, C.A. Tippets, C. Kirsch, S. Mitran, E.T. Samulski, R. Lopez, Balance between light trapping and charge carrier collection: electro-photonic optimization of organic photovoltaics with ridge-patterned back electrodes. J. Appl. Phys. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.481223510.1063/1.4812235 ↗
38. W.E.I. Sha, X. Li, W.C.H. Choy, Breaking the space charge limit in organic solar cells by a novel plasmonic-electrical concept. Sci Rep. 4(1), 1–10 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0623610.1038/srep06236 ↗
39. W.C.H. Choy, X. Ren, Plasmon-electrical effects on organic solar cells by incorporation of metal nanostructures. IEEE J. Sel. Top Quantum Electron. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2015.244267910.1109/JSTQE.2015.2442679 ↗
40. A. Pivrikas, N.S. Sarifciftci, G. Juska, R. Österbacka, A review of charge transport and recombination in polymer/fullerene organic solar cells. Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 15, 677–696 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.79110.1002/pip.791 ↗
41. M. Stolterfoht, A. Armin, B. Philippa et al., Photocarrier drift distance in organic solar cells and photodetectors. Sci. Rep. 5(1), 1–7 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep0994910.1038/srep09949 ↗
42. T.A.F. König, P.A. Ledin, J. Kerszulis et al., Electrically tunable plasmonic behavior of nanocube-polymer nanomaterials induced by a redox-active electrochromic polymer. ACS Nano 8(6), 6182–6192 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn501601e10.1021/nn501601e ↗
43. Y. Zhang, Y. Cui, W. Wang et al., Absorption enhancement in organic solar cells with a built-in short-pitch plasmonic grating. Plasmonics 10(4), 773–781 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11468-014-9864-310.1007/s11468-014-9864-3 ↗
44. H.U. Yang, J. D’Archangel, M.L. Sundheimer, E. Tucker, G.D. Boreman, M.B. Raschke, Optical dielectric function of silver. Phys. Rev. B. 91(23), 235137 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.91.23513710.1103/PhysRevB.91.235137 ↗
45. J.B. Kim, Z.L. Guan, A.L. Shu, A. Kahn, Y.L. Loo, Annealing sequence dependent open-circuit voltage of inverted polymer solar cells attributable to interfacial chemical reaction between top electrodes and photoactive layers. Langmuir 27(17), 11265–11271 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/la202178p10.1021/la202178p ↗
46. I.C. Ghosekar, G.C. Patil, Thermal stability analysis of buffered layer P3HT/P3HT:PCBM organic solar cells. IET Optoelectron. 13(5), 240–246 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-opt.2018.517310.1049/iet-opt.2018.5173 ↗
47. H. Kim, W.W. So, S.J. Moon, The importance of post-annealing process in the device performance of poly(3-hexylthiophene): Methanofullerene polymer solar cell. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells. 91(7), 581–587 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2006.11.01010.1016/j.solmat.2006.11.010 ↗
48. M.T. Dang, L. Hirsch, G. Wantz, P3HT:PCBM, best seller in polymer photovoltaic research. Adv. Mater. 23(31), 3597–3602 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.20110079210.1002/adma.201100792 ↗
49. N. Chandrasekaran, A. Kumar, L. Thomsen, D. Kabra, C.R. McNeill, High performance as-cast P3HT:PCBM devices: understanding the role of molecular weight in high regioregularity P3HT. Mater. Adv. 2(6), 2045–2054 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00738b10.1039/d0ma00738b ↗
50. R. Meitzner, T. Faber, S. Alam et al., Impact of P3HT materials properties and layer architecture on OPV device stability. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 202, 110151 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.11015110.1016/j.solmat.2019.110151 ↗
51. M. Loeza-Poot, J. Méndez-Hernández, M. Oviedo-Mendoza, R. Mis-Fernández, J.L. Peña, E. Hernández-Rodríguez, Effects of the processing variables on the optical properties of P3HT:PCBM absorber layer: an statical point of view. Org. Electron. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113514. (En revisión)10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113514 ↗
52. S. Nam, J. Jang, H. Cha et al., Effects of direct solvent exposure on the nanoscale morphologies and electrical characteristics of PCBM-based transistors and photovoltaics. J. Mater. Chem. 22(12), 5543–5549 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2jm15260f10.1039/c2jm15260f ↗
53. B. Kadem, A. Hassan, W. Cranton, Efficient P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunction organic solar cells; effect of post deposition thermal treatment. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27(7), 7038–7048 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-4661-810.1007/s10854-016-4661-8 ↗
54. J. Munshi, G. Balasubramanian, Investigating blend morphology of P3HT:PCBM bulk heterojunction solar cells by classical atomistic simulations–progress and prospects. Soft. Mater. 18(2–3), 163–176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/1539445X.2019.171139710.1080/1539445X.2019.1711397 ↗
55. J.K. Choi, J.K. Jin, M.L. Jin, C.J. An, H.T. Jung, Comparison of blend morphologies of the nano-patterned photoactive films via two different techniques: thermal-assisted and solvent-assisted soft-nanoimprint lithography. RSC Adv. 4(24), 12302–12308 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra46489j10.1039/c3ra46489j ↗
56. S. Rafique, S.M. Abdullah, K. Sulaiman, M. Iwamoto, Fundamentals of bulk heterojunction organic solar cells: an overview of stability/degradation issues and strategies for improvement. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018(84), 43–53 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.12.00810.1016/j.rser.2017.12.008 ↗
57. D.W. Sievers, V. Shrotriya, Y. Yang, Modeling optical effects and thickness dependent current in polymer bulk-heterojunction solar cells. J. Appl. Phys. 100(11), 114509 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.238885410.1063/1.2388854 ↗
58. M. Lenes, M. Morana, C.J. Brabec, P.W.M.M. Blom, Recombination-limited photocurrents in low bandgap polymer/fullerene solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 19(7), 1106–1111 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.20080151410.1002/adfm.200801514 ↗
59. G. Namkoong, J. Kong, M. Samson, I.W. Hwang, K. Lee, Active layer thickness effect on the recombination process of PCDTBT:PC71BM organic solar cells. Org. Electron. 14(1), 74–79 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2012.10.02510.1016/j.orgel.2012.10.025 ↗
60. C.E. Small, S.-W. Tsang, S. Chen et al., Loss mechanisms in thick-film low-bandgap polymer solar cells. Adv. Energy Mater. 3(7), 909–916 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.20120111410.1002/aenm.201201114 ↗
61. P. Kaienburg, U. Rau, T. Kirchartz, Extracting information about the electronic quality of organic solar-cell absorbers from fill factor and thickness. Phys. Rev. Appl. 6(2), 024001 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.02400110.1103/PhysRevApplied.6.024001 ↗
62. Y. Udum, P. Denk, G. Adam et al., Inverted bulk-heterojunction solar cell with cross-linked hole-blocking layer. Org. Electron Phys. Mater. Appl. 15(5), 997–1001 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgel.2014.02.00910.1016/j.orgel.2014.02.009 ↗
63. S.A. Maier, Plasmonics: fundamentals and applications (Springer, US, New York, 2007)10.1007/0-387-37825-1 ↗
64. W.L. Barnes, A. Dereux, T.W. Ebbesen, Surface plasmon subwavelength optics. Nature 424(6950), 824–830 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature0193710.1038/nature01937 ↗
65. K. Tvingstedt, Z. Tang, O. Inganäs, Light trapping with total internal reflection and transparent electrodes in organic photovoltaic devices. Appl. Phys. Lett. (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475912510.1063/1.4759125 ↗
66. C.E.R. Disney, S. Pillai, M.A. Green, The impact of parasitic loss on solar cells with plasmonic nano-textured rear reflectors. Sci. Rep. 7(1), 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12896-110.1038/s41598-017-12896-1 ↗
67. Y. Zou, X. Sheng, K. Xia, H. Fu, J. Hu, Parasitic loss suppression in photonic and plasmonic photovoltaic light trapping structures. Opt Express. 22(S4), A1197 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.22.0a119710.1364/oe.22.0a1197 ↗
68. S.R. Cowan, J. Wang, J. Yi, Y.J. Lee, D.C. Olson, J.W.P. Hsu, Intensity and wavelength dependence of bimolecular recombination in P3HT:PCBM solar cells: a white-light biased external quantum efficiency study. J Appl Phys. 113(15), 154504 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.480192010.1063/1.4801920 ↗
69. G. Lakhwani, A. Rao, R.H. Friend, Bimolecular recombination in organic photovoltaics. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65(1), 557–581 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-10361510.1146/annurev-physchem-040513-103615 ↗
70. A.M. Goodman, A. Rose, Double extraction of uniformly generated electron-hole pairs from insulators with noninjecting contacts. J. Appl. Phys. 42(7), 2823–2830 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.166063310.1063/1.1660633 ↗
71. V.D. Mihailetchi, J. Wildeman, P.W.M. Blom, Space-charge limited photocurrent. Phys. Rev. Lett. 94(12), 1–4 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.12660210.1103/PhysRevLett.94.126602 ↗
72. L.J.A. Koster, V.D. Mihailetchi, H. Xie, P.W.M. Blom, Origin of the light intensity dependence of the short-circuit current of polymer/fullerene solar cells. Appl Phys Lett. 87(20), 1–3 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.213039610.1063/1.2130396 ↗
73. S. Wilken, O.J. Sandberg, D. Scheunemann, R. Österbacka, Watching space charge build up in an organic solar cell. Sol. RRL. 4(3), 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/solr.20190050510.1002/solr.201900505 ↗