Oxide-based synaptic transistors gated by solution-processed gelatin electrolytes
Source abstract
Abstract
In human brain, a large number of neurons are connected via synapses. Simulation of the synaptic behaviors using electronic devices is the most important step for neuromorphic systems. In this paper, proton conducting gelatin electrolyte-gated oxide field-effect transistors (FETs) were used for emulating synaptic functions, in which the gate electrode is regarded as pre-synaptic neuron and the channel layer as the post-synaptic neuron. In analogy to the biological synapse, a potential spike can be applied at the gate electrode and trigger ionic motion in the gelatin electrolyte, which in turn generates excitatory post-synaptic current (EPSC) in the channel layer. Basic synaptic behaviors including spike time-dependent EPSC, paired-pulse facilitation (PPF), self-adaptation, and frequency-dependent synaptic transmission were successfully mimicked. Such ionic/electronic hybrid devices are beneficial for synaptic electronics and brain-inspired neuromorphic systems.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Memory and Neural Computing · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Neural dynamics and brain function
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. D. Kuzum, S. Yu, H.P. Wong, Nanotechnology 24, 382001 (2013)10.1088/0957-4484/24/38/382001 ↗
2. P. Gkoupidenis, N. Schaefer, X. Strakosas, J.A. Fairfield, G.G. Malliaras, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 263302 (2015)10.1063/1.4938553 ↗
3. Y. Li, Y.-P. Zhong, Y.-X. Zhou, S.-J. Zhong, Y.-Z. Hu, L.O. Chua, X.-S. Miao. Adv. Electron. Mater. 1, 1500125 (2015)10.1002/aelm.201500125 ↗
4. Z.Q. Wang, H.Y. Xu, X.H. Li, H. Yu, Y.C. Liu, X.J. Zhu, Adv. Electron. Mater. 22, 2759 (2012)
5. G.Q. Bi, M.M. Poo, J. Neurosci. 18, 10464 (1998)10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998 ↗
6. G.Q. Bi, M.M. Poo, Nature 401, 792 (1999)10.1038/44573 ↗
7. K. Gacem, J.-M. Retrouvey, D. Chabi, A. Filoramo, W. Zhao, J. Klein, V. Derycke, Nanotechnology 24, 384013 (2013)10.1088/0957-4484/24/38/384013 ↗
8. T. Ohno, T. Hasegawa, T. Tsuruoka, K. Terabe, J.K. Gimzewski, M. Aono, Nat. Mater. 10, 591 (2011)10.1038/nmat3054 ↗
9. Y. Li, Y. Zhong, L. Xu, J. Zhang, X. Xu, H. Sun, X. Miao, Sci. Rep. 3, 1619 (2013)10.1038/srep01619 ↗
10. R. Pan, J. Li, F. Zhuge, L. Zhu, L. Liang, H. Zhang, J. Gao, H. Cao, B. Fu, K. Li, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 013504 (2016)10.1063/1.4939436 ↗
11. F. Alibart, S. Pleutin, O. Bichler, C. Gamrat, T. Serrano-Gotarredona, B. Linares-Barranco, D. Vuillaume, Adv. Funct. Mater. 22, 609 (2012)10.1002/adfm.201101935 ↗
12. H. Tian, W. Mi, X.-F. Wang, H. Zhao, Q.-Y. Xie, C. Li, Y.-X. Li, Y. Yang, T.-L. Ren, Nano Lett. 15, 8013 (2015)10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03283 ↗
13. J. Shi, S.D. Ha, Y. Zhou, F. Schoofs, S. Ramanathan. Nat. Commun. 4, 2676 (2013)10.1038/ncomms3676 ↗
14. C.J. Wan, L.Q. Zhu, J.M. Zhou, Y. Shi, Q. Wan, Nanoscale 6, 4491 (2014)10.1039/C3NR05882D ↗
15. C. Qian, L. Kong, J. Yang, Y. Gao, J. Sun, Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 083302 (2017)10.1063/1.4977069 ↗
16. T. Mills, L.G. Kaake, X.-Y. Zhu, Appl. Phys. A 95, 291 (2009)10.1007/s00339-008-5026-9 ↗
17. L. Kong, J. Sun, C. Qian, C. Wang, J. Yang, Y. Gao, Org. Electron 44, 25 (2017)10.1016/j.orgel.2017.02.004 ↗
18. E.E. Josnerger, Y. Deng, W. Sun, R. Kautz, M. Rolandi, Adv. Mater. 26, 4986 (2014)10.1002/adma.201400320 ↗
19. K. Kim, C.-L. Chen, Q. Truong, A.M. Shen, Y. Chen, Adv. Mater. 25, 1693 (2013)10.1002/adma.201203116 ↗
20. P. Gkoupidenis, N. Schaefer, B. Garlan, G.G. Milliaras, Adv. Mater. 27, 7176 (2015)10.1002/adma.201503674 ↗
21. J. Zhou, C. Wan, L. Zhu, Y. Shi, Q. Wan, IEEE Electron Device Lett 34, 1433 (2013)10.1109/LED.2013.2280663 ↗
22. L.Q. Zhu, C.J. Wan, L.Q. Guo, Y. Shi, Q. Wan, Nat. Commun. 5, 3158 (2014)10.1038/ncomms4158 ↗
23. L.-K. Mao, J.-C. Hwang, T.-H. Chang, C.-Y. Hsieh, L.-S. Tsai, Y.-L. Chueh, S.S.H. Hsu, P.-C. Luy, T.-J. Liu, Organic Electron 14, 1170 (2013)10.1016/j.orgel.2013.02.010 ↗
24. L.-K. Mao, J.-C. Hwang, Y.-L. Chueh, Org. Electron 15, 2400 (2014)10.1016/j.orgel.2014.06.040 ↗
25. L.-K. Mao, J.-Y. Gan, J.-C. Hwang, T.-H. Chang, Y.-L. Chueh, Org. Electron 15, 920 (2014)10.1016/j.orgel.2014.01.023 ↗
26. Y. He, J. Sun, C. Qian, L. Kong, J. Jiang, J. Yang, H. Li, Y. Gao, Org. Electron 38, 357 (2016)10.1016/j.orgel.2016.09.017 ↗
27. A. Lu, J. Sun, J. Jiang, Q. Wan, IEEE Electron Device 31, 1137 (2010)10.1109/LED.2010.2061834 ↗
28. F. Liu, C. Qian, J. Sun, P. Liu, Y. Huang, Y. Gao, J. Yang, Appl. Phys. A 122, 311 (2016)10.1007/s00339-016-9903-3 ↗
29. L. Kong, J. Sun, C. Qian, G. Gou, Y. He, J. Yang, Y. Gao, Org. Electron 39, 64 (2016)10.1016/j.orgel.2016.09.029 ↗
30. F. Liu, J. Sun, C. Qian, X. Hu, H. Wu, Y. Huang, J. Yang, Appl. Phys. A 122, 841 (2016)10.1007/s00339-016-0380-5 ↗
31. O. Larsson, E. Said, M. Berggren, X. Crispin, Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 3334 (2009)10.1002/adfm.200900588 ↗
32. Z. Zheng, J. Jiang, J. Guo, J. Sun, J. Yang, Org. Electron 33, 311 (2016)10.1016/j.orgel.2016.03.040 ↗
33. B. Zhou, J. Sun, X. Han, J. Jiang, Q. Wan. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1549 (2011)10.1109/LED.2011.2164612 ↗
34. H. Yuan, H. Shimotani, A. Tsukazaki, A. Ohtomo, M. Kawasaki, Y. Iwasa, Adv. Funct. Mater. 19, 1046 (2009)10.1002/adfm.200801633 ↗
35. J. Zhou, N. Liu, L. Zhu, Y. Shi, Q. Wan, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 36, 198 (2015)10.1109/LED.2014.2381631 ↗
36. G. Indiveri, E. Chicca, R. Douglas, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw 17, 211 (2006)10.1109/TNN.2005.860850 ↗
37. S.H. Jo, T. Chang, I. Ebong, B.B. Bhadviya, P. Mazumder, W. Lu, Nano Lett. 10, 1297 (2010)10.1021/nl904092h ↗
38. D. Kuzum, R.G.D. Jeyasingh, B. Lee, H.-S.P. Wong, Nano Lett. 12, 2179 (2012)10.1021/nl201040y ↗
39. T. Chang, S.-H. Jo, W. Lu, ACS Nano 9, 7669 (2011)10.1021/nn202983n ↗
40. A.L. Fairhall, G.D. Lewen, W. Bialek, R.R.R. van Steveninck, Nature 412, 787 (2001)10.1038/35090500 ↗