Synthesis and characterization of magnetoelectric Ba2Zn2Fe12O22–PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 electrospun core–shell nanofibers for the AC/DC magnetic field sensor application
Source abstract
Abstract
Magnetoelectric one-dimensional Ba2Zn2Fe12O22–PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 core–shell nanofibers for magnetic field sensor applications have been fabricated by using the sol–gel electrospinning technique. Their structural, functional, morphological, compositional, magnetic, dielectric, ferroelectric, and leakage current characteristics were extensively investigated at room temperature. In addition, their magnetoelectric and magnetodielectric properties were analyzed. The ability of the core–shell nanofibers to detect low-strength AC and DC magnetic fields was demonstrated by measuring the magnetoelectric voltage induced by the magnetic field. Additionally, the sensitivity of AC/DC field sensors, the linearity, accuracy, and hysteresis are discussed. The nanofibers exhibit a sensitivity of 730 V/T for the AC magnetic field and 650 V/T for the DC magnetic field at a resonance frequency of 8.3 kHz. The limit of detection and resolution of the AC and DC magnetic field sensors are also calculated and reported. As demonstrated through the experimental results, the Ba2Zn2Fe12O22–PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 core–shell nanofibers are effective in detecting the DC and AC magnetic fields in millitesla and microtesla ranges at room temperature, respectively.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Multiferroics and related materials · ZnO doping and properties · Magnetic Properties and Synthesis of Ferrites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. E.H. Apu, M. Nafiujjaman, S. Sandeep, A.V. Makela, A. Khaleghi, S. Vainio, C.H. Contag, J. Li, I. Balasingham, T. Kim, N. Ashammakhi, Biomedical applications of multifunctional magnetoelectric nanoparticles. Mater. Chem. Front. 6, 1368 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2qm00093h10.1039/d2qm00093h ↗
2. C.M. Kanamadi, J.S. Kim, H.K. Yang, B.K. Moon, B.C. Choi, J.H. Jeong, Synthesis and characterization of CoFe2O4–Ba0.9Sr0.1TiO3 magnetoelectric composites with dielectric and magnetic properties. Appl. Phys. A 97, 575–580 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-009-5254-710.1007/s00339-009-5254-7 ↗
3. P. Durgaprasad, J. Hemalatha, Multifunctional films of poly(vinylidene fluoride)/ZnFe2O4 nanofibers for nanogenerator applications. J. Alloys Compd. 854, 157189 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.15718910.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157189 ↗
4. D.A. Pan, S.G. Zhang, J.J. Tian, J.S. Sun, A.A. Volinsky, L.J. Qiao, Resonant modes and magnetoelectric performance of PZT/Ni cylindrical layered composites. Appl. Phys. A 98, 449–454 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-009-5419-410.1007/s00339-009-5419-4 ↗
5. P. Martins, D. Silva, M.P. Silva, S. Lanceros-Mendez, Improved magnetodielectric coefficient on polymer based composites through enhanced indirect magnetoelectric coupling. Appl. Phys. Lett. 109, 112905 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.496300310.1063/1.4963003 ↗
6. K.V. Vivekananda, B. Dhanalakshmi, B.P. Rao, P.S.V.S. Rao, Enhanced magnetoelectric coupling in Bi0.95Mn0.05FeO3–Ni0.5Zn0.5Fe2O4 nanocomposites for spintronic applications. Appl. Phys. A 127, 187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-04346-710.1007/s00339-021-04346-7 ↗
7. P. Durgaprasad, J. Hemalatha, Energy harvesting performance of magnetoelectric poly(vinylidene fluoride)/NiFe2O4 nanofiber films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 532, 167986 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2021.16798610.1016/j.jmmm.2021.167986 ↗
8. P. Martins, J. Nunes, J. Oliveira, N. Perinka, S. Lanceros-Mendez, Spray-printed magnetoelectric multifunctional composites. Compos. B Eng. 187, 107829 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10782910.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107829 ↗
9. V.K. Belyaev, V.V. Rodionova, A.A. Grunin, M. Inoue, A.A. Fedyanin, Magnetic field sensor based on magnetoplasmonic crystal. Sci. Rep. 10, 7133 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63535-110.1038/s41598-020-63535-1 ↗
10. J. Fang, Y. Yang, W. Xiao, B. Zheng, Y. Lv, X. Liua, J. Ding, Extremely low frequency alternating magnetic field–triggered and MRI–traced drug delivery by optimized magnetic zeolitic imidazolate framework-90 nanoparticles. Nanoscale 8, 3259 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr08086j10.1039/c5nr08086j ↗
11. A.C. Lima, N. Pereira, R. Policia, Ribeiro, V. Correia, S. Lanceros-Mendez, P. Martins, All-printed multilayer materials with improved magnetoelectric response. J. Mater. Chem. C 7, 5394–5400 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TC01428D10.1039/C9TC01428D ↗
12. A. Aubert, V. Loyau, G. Chaplier, F. Mazaleyrat, M. LoBue, Enhanced magnetoelectric voltage in ferrite/PZT/ferrite composite for AC current sensor application. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 29, 14435–14444 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-018-9576-010.1007/s10854-018-9576-0 ↗
13. Z. Wang, M. Shaygan, M. Otto, D. Schall, D. Neumaier, Flexible Hall sensors based on graphene. Nanoscale 8, 7683 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr08729e10.1039/c5nr08729e ↗
14. S. Qi, H. Guo, J. Chen, J. Fu, C. Hu, M. Yu, Z.L. Wang, Magnetorheological elastomers enabled high-sensitive self-powered tribo-sensor for magnetic field detection. Nanoscale 10, 4745 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr09129j10.1039/c7nr09129j ↗
15. I. Enculescu, M.E. Toimil-Molares, C. Zet, M. Daub, L. Westerberg, R. Neumann, R. Spohr, Current perpendicular to plane single-nanowire GMR sensor. Appl. Phys. AA 86, 43–48 (2007)10.1007/s00339-006-3738-2 ↗
16. S. Divya, K. Jeyadheepan, J. Hemalatha, Magnetoelectric P(VDF-HFP)-CoFe2O4 films and their giant magnetoresistance properties. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 492, 165689 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.16568910.1016/j.jmmm.2019.165689 ↗
17. J. Meyer, T. Rempel, M. Schäfers, F. Wittbracht, C. Müller, A.V. Patel, A. Hütten, Giant magnetoresistance effects in gel-like matrices. Smart Mater. Struct. 22, 025032 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/2/02503210.1088/0964-1726/22/2/025032 ↗
18. N.A. Stutzke, S.E. Russek, D.P. Pappas, Low-frequency noise measurements on commercial magnetoresistive magnetic field sensors. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 10Q107 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.186137510.1063/1.1861375 ↗
19. P. Ripka, M. Janosek, Advances in magnetic field sensors. IEEE Sens. J. 10(6), 1108 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2010.204342910.1109/JSEN.2010.2043429 ↗
20. K. Sternickel, A.I. Braginski, Biomagnetism using SQUIDs: status and perspectives. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 19, S160–S171 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/19/3/02410.1088/0953-2048/19/3/024 ↗
21. F.W. Østerberg, G. Rizzi, A.D. Henriksen, M.F. Hansen, Planar Hall effect bridge geometries optimized for magnetic bead detection. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 184505 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.487625610.1063/1.4876256 ↗
22. V.S. Luong, A.T. Nguyen, Q.K. Hoang, T.N. Nguyen, A.T. Nguyen, T.A. Nguyen, V.C. Giap, Magnetoresistive performances in exchange-biased spin valves and their roles in low-field magnetic sensing applications. J. Sci. Adv Mater. Dev. 3, 399–405 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsamd.2018.09.00410.1016/j.jsamd.2018.09.004 ↗
23. P. Wisniowskia, M. Dabek, S. Cardoso, P.P. Freitas, Magnetic field sensing characteristics of MgO based tunneling magnetoresistance devices with Co40Fe40B20 and Co60Fe20B20 electrodes. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 202, 64–68 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2013.01.01910.1016/j.sna.2013.01.019 ↗
24. D. Murzin, D.J. Mapps, K. Levada, V. Belyaev, A. Omelyanchik, L. Panina, V. Rodionova, Ultrasensitive magnetic field sensors for biomedical applications. Sensors 20, 1569 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/s2006156910.3390/s20061569 ↗
25. A. Kumar, D. Kaur, Magnetoelectric heterostructures for next-generation MEMS magnetic field sensing applications. J. Alloys Compd. 897, 163091 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.16309110.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163091 ↗
26. R. Gonçalves, A. Larrea, M.S. Sebastian, V. Sebastian, P. Martins, S. Lanceros-Mendez, Synthesis and size dependent magnetostrictive response of ferrite nanoparticles and their application in magnetoelectric polymer-based multiferroic sensors. J. Mater. Chem. C 4, 10701–10706 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6TC04188D10.1039/C6TC04188D ↗
27. Z. Chu, C. Dong, C. Tu, X. Liang, H. Chen, C. Sun, Z. Yu, S. Dong, N. Sun, A low-power and high-sensitivity magnetic field sensor based on converse magnetoelectric effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 162901 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.512277410.1063/1.5122774 ↗
28. S. Marauska, R. Jahns, H. Greve, E. Quandt, R. Knochel, B. Wagner, MEMS magnetic field sensor based on magnetoelectric composites. J. Micromech. Microeng.Micromech. Microeng. 22, 065024 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/22/6/06502410.1088/0960-1317/22/6/065024 ↗
29. M. Li, A. Matyushov, C. Dong, H. Chen, H. Lin, T. Nan, Z. Qian, M. Rinaldi, Y. Lin, N.X. Sun, Ultra-sensitive NEMS magnetoelectric sensor for picotesla DC magnetic field detection. Appl. Phys. Lett. 110, 143510 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.497969410.1063/1.4979694 ↗
30. S. Dong, J. Zhai, Z. Xing, J. Li, D. Viehland, Extremely low frequency response of magnetoelectric multilayer composites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 102901 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.188178410.1063/1.1881784 ↗
31. J. Zhai, Z. Xing, S. Dong, J. Li, D. Viehland, Detection of pico-Tesla magnetic fields using magneto-electric sensors at room temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 062510 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.217270610.1063/1.2172706 ↗
32. S. Reis, N. Castro, M.P. Silva, V. Correia, J.G. Rocha, P. Martins, S. Lanceros-Mendez, Fabrication and characterization of high-performance polymer-based magnetoelectric DC magnetic field sensors devices. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 64(6), 4628 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.266898910.1109/TIE.2017.2668989 ↗
33. G. Srinivasan, E.T. Rasmussen, R. Hayes, Magnetoelectric effects in ferrite-lead zirconate titanate layered composites: the influence of zinc substitution in ferrites. Phys. Rev. B 67, 014418 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.01441810.1103/PhysRevB.67.014418 ↗
34. G. Sreenivasulu, U. Laletin, V.M. Petrov, V.V. Petrov, G. Srinivasan, A permendur-piezoelectric multiferroic composite for low-noise ultrasensitive magnetic field sensors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 173506 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.470530510.1063/1.4705305 ↗
35. A. McDannald, M. Staruch, G. Sreenivasulu, C. Cantoni, G. Srinivasan, M. Jain, Magnetoelectric coupling in solution derived 3–0 type PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3:xCoFe2O4 nanocomposite films. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 122905 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.479917410.1063/1.4799174 ↗
36. G. Srinivasan, E.T. Rasmussen, B.J. Levin, R. Hayes, Magnetoelectric effects in bilayers and multilayers of magnetostrictive and piezoelectric perovskite oxides. Phys. Rev. B 65, 134402 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.13440210.1103/PhysRevB.65.134402 ↗
37. G. Schileo, Recent developments in ceramic multiferroic composites based on core/shell and other heterostructures obtained by sol–gel routes. Prog. Solid. State Ch. 41, 87–98 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2013.09.00110.1016/j.progsolidstchem.2013.09.001 ↗
38. S.M. Sakar, S. Balakumar, P. Saravanan, S.N. Jaisankar, Electric field induced formation of one-dimensional bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) nanostructures in electrospinning process. Mater. Des. 94, 487–495 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.02910.1016/j.matdes.2016.01.029 ↗
39. M. Sangmanee, S. Maensiri, Nanostructures and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4) fabricated by electrospinning. Appl. Phys. A 97, 167–177 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-009-5256-510.1007/s00339-009-5256-5 ↗
40. A. Safartoobi, J. Mazloom, F.E. Ghodsi, Electrochemical and optical properties of magnetic CuFe2O4 nanofibers grown by PVP and PVA-assisted sol–gel electrospinning. Appl. Phys. A 128, 13 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-021-05162-910.1007/s00339-021-05162-9 ↗
41. M. Tebyetekerwa, Z. Xu, S. Yang, S. Ramakrishna, Electrospun nanofibers-based face masks. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2, 161–166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-020-00049-510.1007/s42765-020-00049-5 ↗
42. Y. Su, T. Fan, W. Cui, Y. Li, S. Ramakrishna, Y. Long, Advanced electrospun nanofibrous materials for efficient oil/water separation. Adv. Fiber Mater. 4, 938–958 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-022-00158-310.1007/s42765-022-00158-3 ↗
43. M. Chen, Z. Wang, K. Li, X. Wang, L. Wei, Elastic and stretchable functional fibers: a review of materials, fabrication methods, and applications. Adv Fiber Mater. 3, 1–13 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-020-00057-510.1007/s42765-020-00057-5 ↗
44. S. Yao, S. Ramakrishna, G. Chen, Recent advances in metal-organic frameworks based on electrospinning for energy storage. Adv. Fiber Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-023-00287-310.1007/s42765-023-00287-3 ↗
45. J. Xue, T. Wu, Y. Dai, Y. Xia, Electrospinning and electrospun nanofibers: methods, materials, and applications. Chem. Rev. 119(8), 5298–5415 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b0059310.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00593 ↗
46. G.T.V. Prabu, B. Dhurai, A novel profiled multi-pin electrospinning system for nanofiber production and encapsulation of nanoparticles into nanofibers. Sci. Rep. 10, 4302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-60752-610.1038/s41598-020-60752-6 ↗
47. J. Horne, L. McLoughlin, B. Bridgers, E.K. Wujcik, Recent developments in nanofiber-based sensors for disease detection, immunosensing, and monitoring. Sens. Actuators Rep. 2, 100005 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snr.2020.10000510.1016/j.snr.2020.100005 ↗
48. E. Zdraveva, J. Fang, B. Mijovic, T. Lin, 11—Electrospun nanofibers, in Woodhead publishing series in textiles, structure and properties of high-performance fibers. ed. by G. Bhat (Woodhead Publishing, Sawston, 2017), pp.267–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100550-7.00011-510.1016/B978-0-08-100550-7.00011-5 ↗
49. M.H.A. Zanin, N.N.P. Cerize, A.M. de Oliveira, Production of nanofibers by electrospinning technology: overview and application in cosmetics, in Nanocosmetics and nanomedicines. ed. by R. Beck, S. Guterres, A. Pohlmann (Springer, Berlin, 2011), pp.311–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19792-5_1610.1007/978-3-642-19792-5_16 ↗
50. S. Xie, F. Ma, Y. Liu, J. Li, Multiferroic CoFe2O4–Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 core-shell nanofibers and their magnetoelectric coupling. Nanoscale 3, 3152 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1NR10288E10.1039/C1NR10288E ↗
51. G. Sreenivasulu, M. Popov, R. Zhang, K. Sharma, C. Janes, A. Mukundan, G. Srinivasan, Magnetic field assisted self-assembly of ferrite-ferroelectric core-shell nanofibers and studies on magneto-electric interactions. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 052910 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486411310.1063/1.4864113 ↗
52. B. Fu, R. Lu, K. Gao, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, Substrate clamping effect onto magnetoelectric coupling in multiferroic BaTiO3-CoFe2O4 core-shell nanofibers via coaxial electrospinning. EPL 112, 27002 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/112/2700210.1209/0295-5075/112/27002 ↗
53. M. Karamifard, Assessment of photonic crystal fibers for dispersion factor of different structure. J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. Control 5(1), 21–25 (2022)
54. V.M. Petrov, J. Zhang, H. Qu, P. Zhou, T. Zhang, G. Srinivasan, Theory of magnetoelectric effects in multiferroic core–shell nanofibers of hexagonal ferrites and ferroelectrics. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 51, 284004 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/aac56f10.1088/1361-6463/aac56f ↗
55. A. Keirouz, Z. Wang, V.S. Reddy, Z.K. Nagy, P. Vass, M. Buzgo, S. Ramakrishna, N. Radacs, The history of electrospinning: past, present, and futuredevelopments. Adv. Mater. Technol. 8, 2201723 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.20220172310.1002/admt.202201723 ↗
56. Z.M. Huang, Y.Z. Zhang, M. Kotaki, S. Ramakrishna, A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 3, 2223–2253 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-710.1016/S0266-3538(03)00178-7 ↗
57. B. Xu, S. Ma, Y. Xiang, J. Zhang, M. Zhu, L. Wei, G. Tao, D. Deng, In-fiber structured particles and filament arrays from the perspective of fluid instabilities. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2, 1–12 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-019-00024-910.1007/s42765-019-00024-9 ↗
58. A. Balilonda, Q. Li, M. Tebyetekerwa, R. Tusiime, H. Zhang, R. Jose, F. Zabihi, S. Yang, S. Ramakrishna, M. Zhu, Perovskite solar fibers: current status, issues and challenges. Adv. Fiber Mater. 1, 101–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-019-00011-010.1007/s42765-019-00011-0 ↗
59. J. Zhou, Z. Hu, F. Zabihi, Z. Chen, M. Zhu, Progress and perspective of antiviral protective material. Adv. Fiber Mater. 2, 123–139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42765-020-00047-710.1007/s42765-020-00047-7 ↗
60. W. Ma, Y. Zhang, S. Pan, Y. Cheng, Z. Shao, H. Xiang, G. Chen, L. Zhu, W. Weng, H. Bai, M. Zhu, Smart fibers for energy conversion and storage. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 7009–7061 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS01603A10.1039/D0CS01603A ↗
61. R. Srivastava, B.C. Yadav, Ferrite materials: introduction, synthesis techniques, and applications as sensors. Int. J. Green Nanotechnol. 4(2), 141–154 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1080/19430892.2012.67691810.1080/19430892.2012.676918 ↗
62. M. Naghdi, M. Ghovvati, N. Rabiee, S. Ahmadi, N. Abbariki, S. Sojdeh, A. Ojaghi, M. Bagherzadeh, O. Akhavan, E. Sharifi, M. Rabiee, M.R. Saeb, K. Bolouri, T.J. Webster, E.N. Zare, A. Zarrabi, Magnetic nanocomposites for biomedical applications. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 308, 102771 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cis.2022.10277110.1016/j.cis.2022.102771 ↗
63. F. Licci, S. Rinaldi, Magnetostriction of some hexagonal ferrites. J. Appl. Phys. 52, 2442 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.32896110.1063/1.328961 ↗
64. P. Khaenamkaewa, S. Muensit, I.K. Bdikin, A.L. Kholkin, Effect of Zr/Ti ratio on the microstructure and ferroelectric properties of lead zirconate titanate thin films. Mater. Chem. Phys. 102, 159–164 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.01910.1016/j.matchemphys.2006.11.019 ↗
65. Z.J. Wang, Y. Aoki, L.J. Yan, H. Kokawa, R. Maeda, Crystal structure and microstructure of lead zirconate titanate (PZT) thin films with various Zr/Ti ratios grown by hybrid processing. J. Cryst. Growth 267, 92–99 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.01110.1016/j.jcrysgro.2004.03.011 ↗
66. K. Ramam, M. Lopez, Ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of Ba modified lead zirconium titanate ceramics. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 39, 4466–4471 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/39/20/02510.1088/0022-3727/39/20/025 ↗
67. M. Irfan, M. Usman, A. Elahi, U. Khan, T. Khan, K. Javed, S.S. Ali, A. Shakoor, Influence of Nd3+ substitution on physical, electrical and dielectric properties of Ba2Zn2Fe12O22 hexagonal ferrites prepared by sol–gel auto combustion method. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27, 3637–3644 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-015-4202-x10.1007/s10854-015-4202-x ↗
68. S.K. Yadav, J. Hemalatha, Electrospinning and characterization of magnetoelectric NdFeO3–PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 core–shell nanofibers. Ceram. Int. 48, 18415–18424 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.11010.1016/j.ceramint.2022.03.110 ↗
69. N. Adhlakha, K.L. Yadav, Structural, dielectric, magnetic, and optical properties of Ni0.75Zn0.25F2O4–BiFeO3 composites. J. Mater. Sci. 49, 4423–4438 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8139-x10.1007/s10853-014-8139-x ↗
70. R.D. Waldron, Infrared spectra of ferrites. Phys. Rev. 99, 1727 (1955). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.99.172710.1103/PhysRev.99.1727 ↗
71. A. Nikzad, A. Ghasemi, M.K. Tehrani, G.R. Gordani, Y-Type strontium hexaferrite: the role of Al substitution, structural, and magnetic consequence. J. Supercond. Nov. Magn. 28, 3579–3586 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10948-015-3194-310.1007/s10948-015-3194-3 ↗
72. C.H. Perry, B.N. Khanna, G. Rupprecht, Infrared studies of perovskite titanates. Phys. Rev. 135, A408 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.135.A40810.1103/PhysRev.135.A408 ↗
73. A.K. Zak, W.H. Abd, Majid, Effect of solvent on structure and optical properties of PZT nanoparticles prepared by sol–gel method, in infrared region. Ceram. Int. 37, 753–758 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2010.10.02010.1016/j.ceramint.2010.10.020 ↗
74. M. Sakar, S. Balakumar, P. Saravanan, S.N. Jaisankar, Annealing temperature mediated physical properties of bismuth ferrite (BiFeO3) nanostructures synthesized by a novel wet chemical method. Mater. Res. Bull. 48, 2878–2885 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.00810.1016/j.materresbull.2013.04.008 ↗
75. S. Torkian, A. Ghasemi, R.S. Razavi, Cation distribution and magnetic analysis of wideband microwave absorptive CoxNi1−xFe2O4 ferrites. Ceram. Int. 43, 6987–6995 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.12410.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.124 ↗
76. N.A.M. Barakat, M.F. Abadir, K.T. Nam, A.M. Hamza, S.S. Al-Deyab, W. Baek, H.Y. Kim, Synthesis and film formation of iron–cobalt nanofibers encapsulated in graphite shell: magnetic, electric and optical properties study. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 10957–10964 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1JM00052G10.1039/C1JM00052G ↗
77. S.H. Xie, J.Y. Li, Y. Qiao, Y.Y. Liu, L.N. Lan, Y.C. Zhou, S.T. Tan, Multiferroic CoFe2O4–PbZr0.52Ti0.48O3 nanofibers by electrospinning. Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 062901 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.283718510.1063/1.2837185 ↗
78. A. Chaudhuri, K. Mandal, Large magnetoelectric properties in CoFe2O4:BaTiO3 core–shell nanocomposites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 377, 441–445 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.14210.1016/j.jmmm.2014.10.142 ↗
79. P. Martins, Y.V. Kolen’ko, J. Rivas, S. Lanceros-Mendez, Tailored magnetic and magnetoelectric responses of polymer-based composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 15017–15022 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b0410210.1021/acsami.5b04102 ↗
80. C. Rayssi, S. El Kossi, J. Dhahri, K. Khirounib, Frequency and temperature-dependence of dielectric permittivity and electric modulus studies of the solid solution Ca0.85Er0.1Ti1−xCo4x/3O3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.1). RSC Adv. 8, 17139 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA00794B10.1039/C8RA00794B ↗
81. S.K. Yadav, J. Hemalatha, Direct magnetoelectric and magnetodielectric studies of electrospun Ba2Ni2Fe12O22–Pb(Zr0.52Ti0.48)O3 core–shell nanofibers. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 564, 170174 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.17017410.1016/j.jmmm.2022.170174 ↗
82. M. Kumar, K.L. Yadav, Magnetoelectric characterization of xNi0.75Co0.25Fe2O4–(1 − x)BiFeO3 nanocomposites. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 8, 1791–1795 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2007.05.00610.1016/j.jpcs.2007.05.006 ↗
83. H. Wang, H. Yang, F. Xiang, X. Yao, Low-loss electromagnetic composites for RF and microwave applications. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 58(9), 1947–1953 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2011.203510.1109/TUFFC.2011.2035 ↗
84. Y. Liu, G. Sreenivasulu, P. Zhou, J. Fu, D. Filippov, W. Zhang, T. Zhou, T. Zhang, P. Shah, M.R. Page, G. Srinivasan, S. Berweger, T.M. Wallis, P. Kabos, Converse magneto-electric effects in a core–shell multiferroic nanofiber by electric field tuning of ferromagnetic resonance. Sci. Rep. 10, 20170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-77041-x10.1038/s41598-020-77041-x ↗
85. R. Pandey, U. Shankar, S.S. Meena, A.K. Singh, Stability of ferroelectric phases and magnetoelectric response in multiferroic (1 − x)Bi(Ni1/2Ti1/2)O3-PbTiO3/xNi0.6Zn0.4Fe2O4 particulate composites. Ceram. Int. 45, 23013–23021 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.34810.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.348 ↗
86. L.K. Pradhan, R. Pandey, R. Kumar, M. Kar, Lattice strain induced multiferroicity in PZT-CFO particulate composite. J. Appl. Phys. 123, 074101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.500860710.1063/1.5008607 ↗
87. T. Prabhakaran, J. Hemalatha, Magnetoelectric investigations on poly(vinylidene fluoride)/NiFe2O4 flexible films fabricated through a solution casting method. RSC Adv. 6, 86880 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra18032a10.1039/c6ra18032a ↗
88. S. Divya, J. Hemalatha, Study on the enhancement of ferroelectric β phase in P(VDF-HFP) films under heating and poling conditions. Eur. Polym. J. 88, 136–147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.01.01610.1016/j.eurpolymj.2017.01.016 ↗
89. S.M. Cho, D.Y. Jeon, Effect of annealing conditions on the leakage current characteristics of ferroelectric PZT thin films grown by sol–gel process. Thin Solid Films 338, 149–154 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-6090(98)01334-010.1016/S0040-6090(98)01334-0 ↗
90. E.W. Lim, R. Ismail, Conduction mechanism of valence change resistive switching memory: a survey. Electronics 4, 586–613 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics403058610.3390/electronics4030586 ↗
91. V.P. Afanasjev, A.A. Petrov, I.P. Pronin, E.A. Tarakanov, E.J. Kaptelov, J. Graul, Polarization and self-polarization in thin PbZr1-xTixO3 (PZT) films. J. Phys. Condens. MatterCondens. Matter 13, 8755–8763 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/13/39/30410.1088/0953-8984/13/39/304 ↗
92. S. Singh, N. Kumar, A. Jha, M. Sahni, K. Sung, J.H. Jung, S. Chaubey, Study of magnetic, dielectric and magnetodielectric properties of BaTiO3/Fe3O4 core/shell nanocomposite. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 26, 32–36 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-2358-410.1007/s10854-014-2358-4 ↗
93. S. Prathipkumar, J. Hemalatha, Investigation of direct and indirect magnetoelectric couplings in P(VDF-HFP)/CoFe2O4 nanofiber composite films. J. Phys. Chem. C 124, 13878–13885 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0271010.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02710 ↗
94. M. Rawat, K.L. Yadav, Dielectric, ferroelectric and magnetoelectric response in Ba0.92(Bi0.5Na0.5)0.08TiO3−Ni0.65Zn0.35Fe2O4 composite ceramics. Smart Mater. Struct. 23, 085032 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/23/8/08503210.1088/0964-1726/23/8/085032 ↗
95. P. Bansal, M. Kumar, R. Syal, A.K. Singh, S. Kumar, Magnetoelectric coupling enhancement in lead-free BCTZ–xNZFO composites. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 32, 17512–17523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06284-910.1007/s10854-021-06284-9 ↗
96. S. Prathipkumar, J. Hemalatha, Magnetoelectric response and tunnelling magnetoresistance behavior of flexible P(VDF-HFP)/Cobalt ferrite nanofiber composite films. Ceram. Int. 46, 258–269 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.25910.1016/j.ceramint.2019.08.259 ↗
97. S. Prathipkumar, J. Hemalatha, Magnetoelectric behavior and magnetic field-tuned energy storage capacity of SrFe12O19 nanofiber reinforced P(VDF-HFP) composite films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 555, 169378 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2022.16937810.1016/j.jmmm.2022.169378 ↗
98. G. Sreenivasulu, M. Popov, F.A. Chavez, S.L. Hamilton, P.R. Lehto, G. Srinivasan, Controlled self-assembly of multiferroic core-shell nanoparticles exhibiting strong magneto-electric effects. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 052901 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.486369010.1063/1.4863690 ↗
99. M.I. Bichurin, V.M. Petrov, G. Srinivasan, Theory of low-frequency magnetoelectric effects in ferromagnetic-ferroelectric layered composites. J. Appl. Phys. 92(12), 7681 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.152283410.1063/1.1522834 ↗
100. G. Srinivasan, E.T. Rasmussen, A.A. Bush, K.E. Kamentsev, V.F. Meshcheryakov, Y.K. Fetisov, Structural and magnetoelectric properties of MFe2O4–PZT (M = Ni, Co) and Lax(Ca, Sr)1-xMnO3–PZT multilayer composites. Appl. Phys. A 78, 721–728 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-002-1987-210.1007/s00339-002-1987-2 ↗