journal article·2023-01

Electrical performance improvement of charge plasma-based junctionless TFET using novel coalescence of SiGe/GaAs and heterogeneous gate dielectric

Kaushal Kumar, Ajay Kumar, Subhash Chander Sharma

Applied Physics A· Volume 129· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

In this research article, a junctionless tunnel field-effect transistor (JLTFET) based on the charge plasma concept has been proposed and analyzed using novel coalescence of semiconductor materials (Si1-xGex/GaAs) and heterogeneous gate dielectric (SiO2/HfO2). This device utilizes Si1-xGex compound at the source side and GaAs compound at the drain and channel side. The electrical performance of the proposed dual-dielectric material gate heterogeneous JLTFET (DMG-HJLTFET) is compared with the conventional homogeneous-material Si-JLTFET. It is observed that DMG-HJLTFET provides better results in comparison to Si-based JLTFET, with ~ 678 and ~ 3 × 104 times larger ON-state current (ION) and ON-state current/OFF-state current ratio (ION/IOFF) along with ~ 2 × 10–2, 16.66%, and 65% smaller IOFF, threshold voltage (Vth), and subthreshold slope (SS), respectively. The favorable results are obtained due to the formation of a conduction band (C.B) local minima at the source/channel (SE/CL) interface at an ideal Ge mole composition (x = 0.9) in Si1-xGex, which is the reason for the thinner tunneling barrier breadth. Moreover, when compared to Si-JLTFET, the DMG-HJLTFET has 496 times larger transconductance (gm), resulting in ~ 1.4 × 102, 788, and 8 × 102 times higher device efficacy, cut-off frequency (fT), and gain bandwidth product (GBP), respectively, as well as a ~ 40%, lower parasitic capacitance value, making it ideal for fast switching applications.
Source: expertdata · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor materials and devices · Advancements in Semiconductor Devices and Circuit Design · Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. G.E. Moore, Proc. IEEE 86, 82 (1998)10.1109/JPROC.1998.658762 ↗
2. C. Anghel, Hraziia, A. Gupta, A. Amara, A. Vladimirescu, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 58, 1649 (2011)10.1109/TED.2011.2128320 ↗
3. J.H. Kim, S. Kim, B.G. Park, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 66, 1656 (2019)10.1109/TED.2019.2899206 ↗
4. N. Gupta, A. Kumar, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 127, 1 (2021)10.1007/s00339-020-04132-x ↗
5. A.S. Verhulst, W.G. Vandenberghe, K. Maex, S. De Gendt, M.M. Heyns, G. Groeseneken, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 29, 1398 (2008)10.1109/LED.2008.2007599 ↗
6. D.H. Ahn, S.H. Yoon, K. Kato, T. Fukui, M. Takenaka, S. Takagi, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 66, 1862 (2019)10.1109/TED.2019.2897821 ↗
7. U. E. Avci and I. A. Young, Tech. Dig. - Int. Electron Devices Meet. IEDM (2013)
8. Z. Yang, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 37, 839–842 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2016.257482110.1109/LED.2016.2574821 ↗
9. S. Chen, S. Wang, H. Liu, W. Li, Q. Wang, X. Wang, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 64, 1343 (2017)10.1109/TED.2017.2647809 ↗
10. I. Chahardah Cherik, S. Mohammadi, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process 127, 1 (2021)10.1007/s00339-021-04677-5 ↗
11. K. Vanlalawmpuia, B. Bhowmick, SILICON 12, 955 (2019)10.1007/s12633-019-00189-3 ↗
12. S.W. Kim, J.H. Kim, S. Member, T.K. Liu, W.Y. Choi, B. Park, A. An, L. Fet, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 63, 1774 (2016)10.1109/TED.2015.2472496 ↗
13. F. Najam, Y.S. Yu, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 66, 2010 (2019)10.1109/TED.2019.2898403 ↗
14. W. Wang, P.F. Wang, C.M. Zhang, X. Lin, X.Y. Liu, Q.Q. Sun, P. Zhou, D.W. Zhang, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 61, 193 (2014)10.1109/TED.2013.2289075 ↗
15. P. Singh, D.S. Yadav, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 128, 1 (2022)10.1007/s00339-021-05118-z ↗
16. H. Lee, S. Park, Y. Lee, H. Nam, C. Shin, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 62, 1778 (2015)10.1109/TED.2014.2365805 ↗
17. G.L. Priya, M. Venkatesh, L. Agarwal, T.S.A. Samuel, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 128, 1 (2022)10.1007/s00339-021-05118-z ↗
18. K. Kumar, S.C. Sharma, Microelectronics J. 130, 105610 (2022)10.1016/j.mejo.2022.105610 ↗
19. K. Kumar, A. Kumar, V. Mishra, and S. Chandra, Silicon (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02111-w10.1007/s12633-022-02111-w ↗
20. H. Aghandeh, S.A. Sedigh Ziabari, Superlattices Microstruct. 111, 103 (2017)10.1016/j.spmi.2017.06.018 ↗
21. R. Molaei Imen Abadi, S.A. Sedigh Ziabari, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 122, 1 (2016)10.1007/s00339-015-9525-1 ↗
22. M.J. Kumar, S. Janardhanan, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 60, 3285 (2013)10.1109/TED.2013.2276888 ↗
23. V. Mishra, Y.K. Verma, S.K. Gupta, V. Rathi, SILICON 14, 2275 (2021)10.1007/s12633-021-01030-6 ↗
24. S. Panda, S. Dash, SILICON 1, 3 (2022)
25. M. Vadizadeh, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 68, 1986 (2021)10.1109/TED.2021.3056632 ↗
26. S. Sharma, R. Chaujar, AEU Int. J. Electron. Commun. 133, 153669 (2021)10.1016/j.aeue.2021.153669 ↗
27. S.A. Ahmad, N. Alam, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 36, 025015 (2021)10.1088/1361-6641/abcdf9 ↗
28. C.S.H. Rani, R.S. Roach, T.S.A. Samuel, S.E. Lawrence, SILICON 14, 5827 (2021)10.1007/s12633-021-01355-2 ↗
29. D. Keighobadi, S. Mohammadi, M. Mohtaram, Trans. Electr. Electron. Mater. 22, 502 (2021)10.1007/s42341-020-00257-1 ↗
30. R.W. Johnson, A. Hultqvist, S.F. Bent, Mater. Today 17, 236 (2014)10.1016/j.mattod.2014.04.026 ↗
31. S. Hussain, N. Mustakim, M. Hasan, J.K. Saha, Nanotechnology 32, 335206 (2021)10.1088/1361-6528/abec07 ↗
32. ATLAS User’s Guide, SILVACO Int., 5.26.1.R (Santa Clara, CA, USA, 2018)10.46619/joccr.2018.1-1027 ↗
33. Y. Zhao, C. Wu, Q. Huang, C. Chen, J. Zhu, L. Guo, R. Jia, Z. Lv, Y. Yang, M. Li, R. Huang, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 38, 540 (2017)10.1109/LED.2017.2679031 ↗
34. R. Venkatasubramanian, M.L. Timmons, M. Mantini, C.T. Kao, N.R. Parikh, MRS Online Proc. Libr 198, 547 (2011)10.1557/PROC-198-547 ↗
35. J. M. Moniz, Tech. Dig. - GaAs IC Symp. (Gallium Arsenide Integr. Circuit) 229 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1109/GAAS.1997.62827510.1109/GAAS.1997.628275 ↗
36. A. S. Youssouf, M. H. Habaebi, S. N. Ibrahim, N. F. Hasbullah, Proc. - 14th IEEE Student Conf. Res. Dev. Adv. Technol. Humanit. SCOReD 2016 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/SCORED.2016.781009410.1109/SCORED.2016.7810094 ↗
37. G. Zhou, Y. Lu, R. Li, Q. Zhang, W. Hwang, Q. Liu, T. Vasen, H. Zhu, J. Kuo, S. Koswatta, T. Kosel, M. Wistey, P. Fay, A. Seabaugh, H. Xing, Device Res. Conf. Conf. Dig. DRC 205–206 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.2011.599449910.1109/DRC.2011.5994499 ↗
38. K.Y. Na, Y.S. Kim, Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 45, 9033 (2006)10.1143/JJAP.45.9033 ↗
39. C.-H. Wang, H. Chu, and Y. Lai, 7381619B2 (2008)
40. A. Kumar, N. Gupta, R. Chaujar, Microelectron. J. 49, 36 (2016)10.1016/j.mejo.2015.12.007 ↗
41. S. Tirkey, D. Sharma, D.S. Yadav, S. Yadav, IEEE Trans. Electron. Devices 64, 3943 (2017)10.1109/TED.2017.2730922 ↗
42. K. Kumar and S. Chandra, Silicon (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-022-02192-710.1007/s12633-022-02192-7 ↗
43. H. Ferhati, F. Djeffal, T. Bentrcia, Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 9177(9), 1856 (2018)10.3762/bjnano.9.177 ↗
44. T. Han, H. Liu, S. Wang, S. Chen, W. Li, X. Yang, M. Cai, K. Yang, Electron 8, 476 (2019)10.3390/electronics8050476 ↗