Evaluation of nanoscale versus hybrid micro/nano surface topographies for endosseous implants
Source abstract
Abstract
We examined the effect of a nanoscale titanium surface topography (D) versus two hybrid micro/nanoscale topographies (B and OS) on adherent mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and bone marrow derived macrophages (BMMs) function in cell culture and in vivo. In the in vitro study, compared to OS and B surfaces, D surface induced earlier and greater cell spreading, and earlier and profound mRNA expression of RUNX2, Osterix and BMP2 in MSCs. D surface induced earlier and higher expression of RUNX2 and BMP2 and lower expression of inflammatory genes in implant adherent cells in vivo. Measurement of osteogenesis at implant surfaces showed greater bone-to-implant contact at D versus OS surfaces after 21 days. We explored the cell population on the D and OS implant surfaces 24 h after placement using single-cell RNA sequencing and identified distinct cell clusters including macrophages, neutrophils and B cells. D surface induced lower expression and earlier reduction of inflammatory genes expression in BMMs in vitro. BMMs on D, B and OS surfaces demonstrated a marked increase of BMP2 expression after 1 and 3 days, and this increase was significantly higher on D surface at day 3. Our data implicates a dynamic process that may be influenced by nanotopography at multiple stages of osseointegration including initial immunomodulation, recruitment of MSCs and later osteoblastic differentiation leading to bone matrix production and mineralization. The results suggest that a nanoscale topography (D) favorably modulates adherent macrophage polarization toward anti-inflammatory and regenerative phenotypes and promotes the osteoinductive phenotype of adherent mesenchymal stem cells. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Our manuscript contains original data developed to define effects of a novel nanotopography on the process of osseointegration at the cell and tissue level. Few studies have compared the effects of a nanoscale surface versus the more typical hybrid micro/nano-scale surfaces used today. We have utilized single-cell RNA sequencing for the first time to identify earliest cell populations on implant surfaces in vivo. We provide data indicating that the nanoscale surface acts upon both osteoprogenitor and immune cell (macrophages) to alter the process of bone formation in a surface-specific manner. This work represents new observations regarding osseointegration and immunomodulation.
Source: europepmc · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (62)
Show source-provided references
1. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01775.x ↗
2. Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: current knowledge and open questions10.1111/prd.12179 ↗
3. A role for surface topography in creating and maintaining bone at titanium endosseous implants10.1067/mpr.2000.111966 ↗
4. Histologic evaluation of the bone integration of TiO(2) blasted and turned titanium microimplants in humans10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.012002128.x ↗
5. Long-term clinical outcome of implants with different surface modifications
6. The influence of different implant surfaces on osseointegration in diabetes: a systematic review of the literature
7. Titanium dental implants with different collar design and surface modifications: a systematic review on survival rates and marginal bone levels10.1111/clr.13389 ↗
8. Nanoscale hybrid implant surfaces and Osterix-mediated osseointegration10.1002/jbm.a.37323 ↗
9. The influence of implant surface on maintenance of marginal bone levels for three premium implant brands: a systematic review and meta-analysis10.11607/jomi.8393 ↗
10. The effects of controlled nanotopography, machined topography and their combination on molecular activities, bone formation and biomechanical stability during osseointegration10.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.001 ↗
11. Enhancing orthopedic implant bioactivity: refining the nanotopography10.2217/nnm.14.216 ↗
12. The role of well-defined nanotopography of titanium implants on osseointegration: cellular and molecular events in vivo
13. Topography-mediated immunomodulation in osseointegration; ally or enemy10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121903 ↗
14. Osseointegration–the biological reality of successful dental implant therapy: a narrative review
15. Titanium implant surface effects on adherent macrophage phenotype: a systematic review10.3390/ma15207314 ↗
16. Titanium surface with nanospikes tunes macrophage polarization to produce inhibitory factors for osteoclastogenesis through nanotopographic cues10.1016/j.actbio.2021.10.019 ↗
17. Nanotopographical cues for regulation of macrophages and osteoclasts: emerging opportunities for osseointegration10.1186/s12951-022-01721-1 ↗
18. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the classification of periodontal and peri-implant diseases and conditions
19. The effect of microcosm biofilm decontamination on surface topography, chemistry, and biocompatibility dynamics of implant titanium surfaces10.3390/ijms231710033 ↗
20. Crestal bone loss associated with different implant surfaces in the posterior mandible in patients with a history of periodontitis. A retrospective study10.1111/clr.13682 ↗
21. Re-osseointegration following reconstructive surgical therapy of experimental peri-implantitis. A pre-clinical in vivo study10.1111/clr.13430 ↗
22. Long-term outcome of surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. A 2-11-year retrospective study10.1111/clr.13138 ↗
23. Osteoblastic and cytokine gene expression of implant-adherent cells in humans10.1111/clr.12054 ↗
24. Microbial decontamination and antibacterial activity of nanostructured titanium dental implants: a narrative review10.3390/nano11092336 ↗
25. Tailoring materials for modulation of macrophage fate
26. Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophages (BMM): isolation and applications10.1101/pdb.prot5080 ↗
27. Advancing of titanium medical implants by surface engineering: recent progress and challenges10.1080/17425247.2021.1928071 ↗
28. Surface nanofeature effects on titanium-adherent human mesenchymal stem cells
29. Fluoride modification effects on osteoblast behavior and bone formation at TiO2 grit-blasted c.p. titanium endosseous implants10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.07.009 ↗
30. Early molecular assessment of osseointegration in humans10.1111/clr.12266 ↗
31. Comparative molecular assessment of early osseointegration in implant-adherent cells10.1016/j.bone.2012.07.026 ↗
32. Nano-scale modification of titanium implant surfaces to enhance osseointegration10.1016/j.actbio.2019.05.045 ↗
33. Biomimetic implant surfaces and their role in biological integration-a concise review10.3390/biomimetics7020074 ↗
34. TiO2 nanotubes regulate histone acetylation through F-actin to induce the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs10.1080/21691401.2021.1910282 ↗
35. F-actin regulates osteoblastic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells on TiO2 nanotubes through MKL1 and YAP/TAZ10.1186/s11671-020-03415-9 ↗
36. Osteoblast-specific transcription factor osterix (Osx) is an upstream regulator of Satb2 during bone formation10.1074/jbc.M111.244236 ↗
37. Nanostructured surface modification to bone implants for bone regeneration10.1166/jbn.2018.2516 ↗
38. Attenuation of the macrophage inflammatory activity by TiO2 nanotubes via inhibition of MAPK and NF-κB pathways
39. Mesenchymal stem cell-macrophage crosstalk and bone healing10.1016/j.biomaterials.2017.12.025 ↗
40. Macrophage response to hydrophilic biomaterials regulates MSC recruitment and T-helper cell populations10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.029 ↗
41. Osteoimmunology: oncostatin M as a pleiotropic regulator of bone formation and resorption in health and disease10.1038/bonekey.2014.22 ↗
42. Oncostatin M, an inflammatory cytokine produced by macrophages, supports intramembranous bone healing in a mouse model of tibia injury10.1016/j.ajpath.2014.11.008 ↗
43. Macrophage type modulates osteogenic differentiation of adipose tissue MSCs10.1007/s00441-017-2598-8 ↗
44. Induction of osteogenesis in mesenchymal stem cells by activated monocytes/macrophages depends on oncostatin M signaling10.1002/stem.1040 ↗
45. Monocytes induce STAT3 activation in human mesenchymal stem cells to promote osteoblast formation10.1371/journal.pone.0039871 ↗
46. Oncostatin M induces angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo10.1161/01.ATV.19.8.1835 ↗
47. Mapping the immune microenvironment for mandibular alveolar bone homeostasis at single-cell resolution10.1038/s41413-021-00141-5 ↗
48. Macrophage M1/M2 polarization dynamically adapts to changes in microenvironment and modulates alveolar bone remodeling after dental implantation10.1002/JLB.1MA0121-001R ↗
49. Spatial distribution of macrophages during callus formation and maturation reveals close crosstalk between macrophages and newly forming vessels10.3389/fimmu.2019.02588 ↗
50. Sequential delivery of immunomodulatory cytokines to facilitate the M1-to-M2 transition of macrophages and enhance vascularization of bone scaffolds10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.017 ↗
51. Titanium surface topography alters cell shape and modulates bone morphogenetic protein 2 expression in the J774A.1 macrophage cell line10.1002/jbm.a.10275 ↗
52. Anodic oxidation and hydrothermal treatment of commercially pure titanium surfaces increases expression of bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the adherent macrophage cell line J774A.110.1002/jbm.a.30988 ↗
53. Immunomodulation effect of a hierarchical macropore/nanosurface on osteogenesis and angiogenesis10.1088/1748-605X/aa6b7c ↗
54. Secretion of BMP-2 by tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) promotes microcalcifications in breast cancer10.1186/s12885-021-09150-3 ↗
55. Crosstalk between muscularis macrophages and enteric neurons regulates gastrointestinal motility10.1016/j.cell.2014.08.002 ↗
56. Regulation of macrophage polarization through surface topography design to facilitate implant-to-bone osteointegration
57. Discovering myeloid cell heterogeneity in mandibular bone – cell by cell analysis10.3389/fphys.2021.731549 ↗
58. N2-polarized neutrophils guide bone mesenchymal stem cell recruitment and initiate bone regeneration: a missing piece of the bone regeneration puzzle10.1002/advs.202100584 ↗
59. Partners in crime: neutrophils and monocytes/macrophages in inflammation and disease10.1007/s00441-017-2753-2 ↗
60. The initial inflammatory response to bioactive implants is characterized by NETosis10.1371/journal.pone.0121359 ↗
61. Hydrophilic titanium surfaces reduce neutrophil inflammatory response and NETosis10.1039/C9BM01474H ↗
62. T and B cells participate in bone repair by infiltrating the fracture callus in a two-wave fashion10.1016/j.bone.2014.03.052 ↗