Enhanced mobility of p-type transparent semiconductor CuI thin films grown on thermal expansion matched substrates
Source abstract
Abstract
Cuprous iodide (CuI) is a promising p-type transparent conductor with high hole mobility and excellent optical transparency. However, its practical application is hindered by the significantly lower mobility observed in thin films compared to bulk crystals, which is primarily attributed to defects formed during the growth process. In thin-film systems, strain is another critical yet often overlooked factor influencing carrier transport. In this study, we examine the impact of strain arising from thermal expansion mismatch in epitaxial CuI films grown by molecular beam epitaxy on CaF2 and Al2O3 substrates. Films on CaF2, whose thermal expansion coefficient closely matches that of CuI, exhibit metallic conduction and a record-high mobility of 33.9 cm2 V−1 s−1 at 2 K. In contrast, films on Al2O3, with a much larger thermal mismatch, show lower mobility and insulating behavior. Exciton spectroscopy reveals that the thermal mismatch introduces structural disorder during the cooling process, which degrades carrier transport. These results highlight the crucial importance of strain engineering, particularly thermal expansion matching, for improving the performance of CuI thin films.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Copper-based nanomaterials and applications · ZnO doping and properties · Thin-Film Transistor Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Applied Physics and Quantum-Phase Electronics Center (QPEC), The University of Tokyo 1 , Tokyo 113-8656,
RIKEN Center for Emergent Matter Science (CEMS) 2 , Wako 351-0198,
Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University 3 , Sendai 980-8578,
Tokyo College, The University of Tokyo 4 , Tokyo 113-8656,
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · Society of Iodine Science
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Nat. Mater. · 2016 · 15 · 38310.1038/nmat4599 ↗
2. NPG Asia Mater. · 2010 · 2 · 1510.1038/asiamat.2010.5 ↗
3. Adv. Mater. · 2016 · 28 · 383110.1002/adma.201503080 ↗
4. Nature · 1997 · 389 · 93910.1038/40087 ↗
5. J. Appl. Phys. · 2011 · 110 · 05490710.1063/1.3633220 ↗
6. Phys. Status Solidi A · 2013 · 210 · 167110.1002/pssa.201329349 ↗
7. Nat. Commun. · 2020 · 11 · 430910.1038/s41467-020-18006-6 ↗
8. Adv. Sci. · 2021 · 8 · 210054610.1002/advs.202100546 ↗
9. Cryst. Growth Des. · 2010 · 10 · 205710.1021/cg100270d ↗
10. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. · 2016 · 113 · 1292910.1073/pnas.1613643113 ↗
11. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. · 2023 · 14 · 616310.1021/acs.jpclett.3c01072 ↗
12. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2024 · 34 · 231614410.1002/adfm.202316144 ↗
13. Chem. Mater. · 2023 · 35 · 899510.1021/acs.chemmater.3c01628 ↗
14. APL Mater. · 2020 · 8 · 09111510.1063/5.0021781 ↗
15. Phys. Status Solidi RRL · 2021 · 15 · 210021410.1002/pssr.202100214 ↗
16. Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2017 · 3 · 170029810.1002/aelm.201700298 ↗
17. Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 399510.1038/s41598-020-61021-2 ↗
18. Physica B · 2019 · 573 · 4510.1016/j.physb.2019.08.021 ↗
19. Surf. Interfaces · 2021 · 27 · 10150010.1016/j.surfin.2021.101500 ↗
20. APL Mater. · 2021 · 9 · 05110110.1063/5.0047723 ↗
21. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2020 · 116 · 19210510.1063/5.0007389 ↗
22. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2021 · 118 · 01210310.1063/5.0036862 ↗
23. Phys. Rev. B · 2022 · 106 · 12530710.1103/physrevb.106.125307 ↗
24. Nat. Commun. · 2024 · 15 · 967210.1038/s41467-024-53541-6 ↗
25. ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. · 2020 · 2 · 362710.1021/acsaelm.0c00692 ↗
26. APL Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 03111310.1063/1.5083792 ↗
27. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2024 · 22 · 04402710.1103/physrevapplied.22.044027 ↗