Current loss analysis in photoelectrochemical devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Ongoing efforts to stabilize the operation of photoelectrochemical (PEC) devices remain critical for achieving economically viable solar fuel production, as devices with lifetimes on the order of 10 to 30 years are projected requirements for utility-scale, PEC device implementation. However, insight into the causes of device degradation and activity losses is generally provided by monitoring the device current, a quantity which masks the relative contributions of photovoltaic component degradation and electrocatalyst activity drops to overall performance losses. In this study, an approach for deconvoluting the various contributors to PEC device losses is described. In particular, the causes for observed fluctuations in device performance are determined through the collection of real-time, current–voltage data, paired with an analytical method that enables the decomposition of drops in device current into its constituent photovoltaic- and catalyst-driven performance losses. We test the validity of this approach by applying it to the data collected for a PEC hydrogen evolution test-bed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced battery technologies research · Advancements in Battery Materials · Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 1 , Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Joint Center for Artificial Photosynthesis, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 2 , Berkeley, California 94720, USA
Walter Schottky Institute and Physics Department, Technische Universität München 3 , Garching 85748, Germany
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Nature · 1972 · 238 · 3710.1038/238037a0 ↗
2. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. · 1971 · 44 · 114810.1246/bcsj.44.1148 ↗
3. Nat. Commun. · 2016 · 7 · 1323710.1038/ncomms13237 ↗
4. Science · 1998 · 280 · 42510.1126/science.280.5362.425 ↗
5. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2000 · 104 · 892010.1021/jp002083b ↗
6. Nat. Energy · 2017 · 2 · 45310.1038/nenergy.2017.28 ↗
7. ACS Energy Lett. · 2018 · 3 · 179510.1021/acsenergylett.8b00920 ↗
8. Adv. Energy Mater. · 2019 · 9 · 180353610.1002/aenm.201803536 ↗
9. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2019 · 12 · 106810.1039/c8ee03547d ↗
10. Nat. Energy · 2017 · 2 · 85510.1038/nenergy.2017.87 ↗
11. Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 500310.1038/s41467-018-07380-x ↗
12. APL Mater. · 2019 · 7 · 08090110.1063/1.5109785 ↗
13. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. · 2017 · 50 · 12400210.1088/1361-6463/aa5b11 ↗
14. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2013 · 6 · 198310.1039/c3ee40831k ↗
15. 2009
16. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2016 · 9 · 235410.1039/c5ee02573g ↗
17. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · H65610.1149/2.1151913jes ↗
18. J. Membr. Sci. · 1996 · 120 · 110.1016/0376-7388(96)00155-x ↗
19. 2003
20. Sustainable Energy Fuels · 2017 · 1 · 206110.1039/c7se00373k ↗
21. Energy Environ. Sci. · 2011 · 4 · 299310.1039/c1ee01203g ↗
22. 2014
23. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2018 · 20 · 2262910.1039/c8cp04021d ↗
24. Chem. Sci. · 2018 · 9 · 606210.1039/c8sc01453a ↗
25. PLoS One · 2019 · 14 · e021620110.1371/journal.pone.0216201 ↗
26. Prog. Photovoltaics · 2013 · 21 · 71310.1002/pip.2158 ↗
27. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy · 2013 · 110 · E107610.1073/pnas.1301532110 ↗
28. J. Electrochem. Soc. · 2019 · 166 · H302010.1149/2.0041905jes ↗