journal article·2015-06Open access

New strain states and radical property tuning of metal oxides using a nanocomposite thin film approach

Judith MacManus-Driscoll, Ady Suwardi, Ahmed Kursumovic, Zhenxing Bi, Chen-Fong Tsai, Haiyan Wang, Quanxi Jia, Oon Jew Lee

APL Materials· Volume 3· Issue 6

Abstract

Auxetic-like strain states were generated in self-assembled nanocomposite thin films of (Ba0.6Sr0.4TiO3)1−x − (Sm2O3)x(BSTO − SmO). A switch from auxetic-like to elastic-like strain behavior was observed for x > 0.50, when the SmO switched from being nanopillars in the BSTO matrix to being the matrix with BSTO nanopillars embedded in it. A simple model was adopted to explain how in-plane strain varies with x. At high x (0.75), strongly enhanced ferroelectric properties were obtained compared to pure BSTO films. The nanocomposite method represents a powerful new way to tune the properties of a wide range of strongly correlated metal oxides whose properties are very sensitive to strain.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Acoustic Wave Resonator Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Device Materials Group, Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FS, United Kingdom

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA

Material Science and Engineering Program, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA

Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies (CINT), Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA

Funding

Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies · National Science Foundation (NSF) · European Research Council (ERC) · Laboratory Directed Research and Development (LDRD)

References (19)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/adfm.20100037310.1002/adfm.201000373 ↗
2. 10.1038/nnano.2011.9810.1038/nnano.2011.98 ↗
3. 10.1021/nl302032u10.1021/nl302032u ↗
4. 10.1063/1.300001310.1063/1.3000013 ↗
5. 10.1021/nl402775h10.1021/nl402775h ↗
6. 10.1021/nn301976p10.1021/nn301976p ↗
7. 10.1088/0953-2048/22/2/02200110.1088/0953-2048/22/2/022001 ↗
8. 10.1002/adma.20140191710.1002/adma.201401917 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.13710.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.137 ↗
10. 10.1002/pssr.20140915610.1002/pssr.201409156 ↗
11. 10.1038/nmat212410.1038/nmat2124 ↗
12. 10.1002/adfm.20130089910.1002/adfm.201300899 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2006.03.06910.1016/j.msea.2006.03.069 ↗
14. 10.1039/C4TA01504E10.1039/C4TA01504E ↗
15. 10.1002/adfm.20080111210.1002/adfm.200801112 ↗
16. Stecura S. · 1961
17. 10.1063/1.147367510.1063/1.1473675 ↗
18. Banerjee S. · 2010
19. Jaffe B. · 2012