Understanding the interplay of surface structure and work function in oxides: A case study on SrTiO3
Source abstract
Abstract
The work function is one of the most fundamental surface properties of a material, and understanding and controlling its value is of central importance for manipulating electron flow in applications ranging from high power vacuum electronics to oxide electronics and solar cells. Recent computational studies using Density Functional Theory (DFT) have demonstrated that DFT-calculated work function values for metals tend to agree well (within about 0.3 eV on average) with experimental values. However, a detailed validation of DFT-calculated work functions for oxide materials has not been conducted and is challenging due to the complex dipole structures that can occur on oxide surfaces. In this work, we have focused our investigation on the widely studied perovskite SrTiO3 as a case study example. We find that DFT can accurately predict the work function values of clean and reconstructed SrTiO3 surfaces vs experiment at about the same level of accuracy as metals when direct comparisons can be made. Furthermore, to aid in understanding the factors governing the work function of oxides, we have performed systematic studies on the influence of common surface features, including surface point defects, doping, adsorbates, reconstructions, and surface steps, on the work function. The relationships between the surface structure and work function for SrTiO3 identified here may be qualitatively applicable to other complex oxide materials.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electronic and Structural Properties of Oxides · Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials · Semiconductor materials and devices
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1 , Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison 2 , Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA
Funding
Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. Adv. Mater. · 2003 · 15 · 27110.1002/adma.200390065 ↗
2. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. · 2002 · 30 · 99810.1109/tps.2002.801527 ↗
3. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. · 1993 · 41 · 1510.1109/22.210224 ↗
4. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2008 · 100 · 01510110.1103/physrevlett.100.015101 ↗
5. 1994
6. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices · 2018 · 65 · 206110.1109/ted.2018.2804484 ↗
7. Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. A · 1928 · 119 · 17310.1098/rspa.1928.0091 ↗
8. Rev. Mod. Phys. · 1949 · 21 · 18510.1103/revmodphys.21.185 ↗
9. Solid-State Electron. · 1965 · 8 · 39510.1016/0038-1101(65)90116-4 ↗
10. 1996
11. J. Catal. · 1986 · 102 · 9210.1016/0021-9517(86)90143-0 ↗
12. Nat. Mater. · 2012 · 11 · 10310.1038/nmat3223 ↗
13. Nature · 2004 · 427 · 42310.1038/nature02308 ↗
14. Nat. Mater. · 2010 · 9 · 76210.1038/nmat2814 ↗
15. J. Appl. Phys. · 1977 · 48 · 472910.1063/1.323539 ↗
16. Phys. Rev. · 1941 · 60 · 66110.1103/physrev.60.661 ↗
17. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 94 · 23541810.1103/physrevb.94.235418 ↗
18. Surf. Sci. · 2019 · 687 · 4810.1016/j.susc.2019.05.002 ↗
19. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 05420710.1103/physrevb.81.054207 ↗
20. APL Mater. · 2017 · 5 · 11610510.1063/1.5006029 ↗
21. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 458 · 82710.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.060 ↗
22. J. Phys. Chem. B · 2006 · 110 · 1845910.1021/jp063347i ↗
23. Adv. Electron. Mater. · 2019 · 5 · 180007410.1002/aelm.201800074 ↗
24. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 547110.1002/adfm.201600243 ↗
25. Phys. Rev. B · 2016 · 93 · 23511610.1103/physrevb.93.235116 ↗
26. J. Am. Chem. Soc. · 2003 · 125 · 1005010.1021/ja034933h ↗
27. Nature · 2002 · 419 · 5510.1038/nature01010 ↗
28. Surf. Sci. · 2011 · 605 · L5110.1016/j.susc.2011.06.001 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2012 · 109 · 25680210.1103/physrevlett.109.256802 ↗
30. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2001 · 86 · 180110.1103/physrevlett.86.1801 ↗
31. J. Phys. Chem. C · 2015 · 119 · 206310.1021/jp511931y ↗
32. Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 3 · 12580310.1103/physrevmaterials.3.125803 ↗
33. Phys. Rev. Mater. · 2019 · 3 · 03440710.1103/physrevmaterials.3.034407 ↗
34. Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. · 2019 · 10 · 159610.3762/bjnano.10.155 ↗
35. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1996 · 77 · 386510.1103/physrevlett.77.3865 ↗
36. J. Chem. Phys. · 2006 · 125 · 22410610.1063/1.2404663 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. B · 2014 · 90 · 03545310.1103/physrevb.90.035453 ↗
38. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 84 · 11545610.1103/physrevb.84.115456 ↗
39. Phys. Rev. B · 2011 · 83 · 11543510.1103/physrevb.83.115435 ↗
40. Nat. Commun. · 2018 · 9 · 371010.1038/s41467-018-05685-5 ↗
41. 1966
42. 1979
43. Phys. Rev. B · 2010 · 81 · 23532210.1103/physrevb.81.235322 ↗
44. Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 515 · 49910.1016/s0039-6028(02)01968-4 ↗
45. I. Rastegar Alam, “Growth and characterization of transition metal oxide heterostructures with a tailored work function,” Ph.D. thesis (Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, Stuttgart, 2018).
46. Phys. Rev. B · 1979 · 20 · 345610.1103/physrevb.20.3456 ↗
47. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2018 · 432 · 4610.1016/j.apsusc.2017.06.272 ↗
48. Phys. Rev. B · 1978 · 17 · 494210.1103/physrevb.17.4942 ↗
49. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 2009 · 21 · 31401310.1088/0953-8984/21/31/314013 ↗
50. Surf. Sci. · 1998 · 418 · 6410.1016/s0039-6028(98)00670-0 ↗
51. Phys. Rev. B · 1998 · 58 · 807510.1103/physrevb.58.8075 ↗
52. J. Appl. Phys. · 2013 · 114 · 10371010.1063/1.4821095 ↗
53. Phys. Status Solidi · 2006 · 243 · 275610.1002/pssb.200642051 ↗
54. Surf. Sci. · 2005 · 575 · 7510.1016/j.susc.2004.11.008 ↗
55. Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 513 · 21110.1016/s0039-6028(02)01730-2 ↗
56. Nano Lett. · 2016 · 16 · 240710.1021/acs.nanolett.5b05211 ↗
57. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2013 · 111 · 05610110.1103/physrevlett.111.056101 ↗
58. Appl. Phys. Lett. · 2009 · 95 · 14191510.1063/1.3240869 ↗
59. Understanding the interplay of surface structure and work function in oxides: A case study on SrTiO310.6084/m9.figshare.12403226 ↗