journal article·2018-01-01Open access

Cold sintering and electrical characterization of lead zirconate titanate piezoelectric ceramics

Dixiong Wang, Hanzheng Guo, Carl S. Morandi, Clive A. Randall, Susan Trolier-McKinstry

APL Materials· Volume 6· Issue 1

Abstract

This paper describes a cold sintering process for Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 ceramics and the associated processing-property relations. Pb(Zr,Ti)O3 has a very small, incongruent solubility that is a challenge during cold sintering. To circumvent this, a Pb(NO3)2 solution was used as the transient liquid phase. A bimodal lead zirconate titanate powder was densified to a relative density of 89% by cold sintering at 300 °C and 500 MPa. After the cold sintering step, the permittivity was 200, and the dielectric loss was 2.0%. A second heat-treatment involving a 3 h anneal at 900 °C increased the relative density to 99%; the resulting relative dielectric permittivity was 1300 at room temperature and 100 kHz. The samples showed well-defined ferroelectric hysteresis loops, having a remanent polarization of 28 μC/cm2. On poling, the piezoelectric coefficient d33 was ∼200 pC/N. With a 700 °C 3 h post-annealing, samples show a lower room temperature relative permittivity (950 at 100 kHz), but a 24 h hold time at 700 °C produces ceramics where there is an improved relative dielectric constant (1050 at 100 kHz).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials · Microwave Dielectric Ceramics Synthesis · Multiferroics and related materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering and Center for Dielectrics and Piezoelectrics, Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University , University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA

Funding

Steward S. Flaschen Professorship · National Science Foundation · DOD | USAF | AFMC | Air Force Office of Scientific Research

References (20)

Show source-provided references
1. Sensors · 2015 · 15 · 253810.3390/s150202538 ↗
2. Appl. Surf. Sci. · 2002 · 188 · 45010.1016/s0169-4332(01)00929-1 ↗
3. Adv. Funct. Mater. · 2016 · 26 · 594010.1002/adfm.201601347 ↗
4. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1983 · 66 · 74310.1111/j.1151-2916.1983.tb10542.x ↗
5. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1966 · 49 · 11310.1111/j.1151-2916.1966.tb15386.x ↗
6. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2005 · 81 · 67710.1111/j.1151-2916.1998.tb02389.x ↗
7. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 1971 · 54 · 26510.1111/j.1151-2916.1971.tb12286.x ↗
8. Ferroelectrics · 2001 · 258 · 5310.1080/00150190108008657 ↗
9. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 1999 · 19 · 99910.1016/s0955-2219(98)00361-6 ↗
10. Smart Mater. Struct. · 2001 · 10 · 87810.1088/0964-1726/10/5/304 ↗
11. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2005 · 88 · 332710.1111/j.1551-2916.2005.00601.x ↗
12. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2014 · 97 · 337810.1111/jace.13277 ↗
13. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2016 · 99 · 348910.1111/jace.14554 ↗
14. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. · 2017 · 100 · 54610.1111/jace.14617 ↗
15. Scr. Mater. · 2017 · 136 · 14110.1016/j.scriptamat.2017.02.004 ↗
16. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces · 2016 · 8 · 2090910.1021/acsami.6b07481 ↗
17. ACS Nano · 2016 · 10 · 1060610.1021/acsnano.6b03800 ↗
18. Rep. Prog. Phys. · 1998 · 61 · 126710.1088/0034-4885/61/9/002 ↗
19. J. Appl. Phys. · 2004 · 95 · 139710.1063/1.1636530 ↗
20. Br. Ceram. Soc. Proc. · 1985 · 36 · 107