Practical demonstration of high-accuracy electronic structure on a quantum computer
Source abstract
Abstract
Quantum computing offers a promising path toward accurate electronic structure calculations, especially for systems where classical methods face limitations. However, most quantum demonstrations to date have focused on simplified systems, lacking the quantitative precision required for direct comparison with experiment. In this work, we present a method tailored for implementation on existing and near-term quantum hardware. Our focus is on predicting a quantity that can be directly compared with experiment, enabling a meaningful benchmark of quantum hardware for chemical applications. We use a compact representation that is achieved through physically motivated simplifications of the wavefunction, reflecting a general strategy of adapting the representation to known properties of the system, even though the degree of simplification is system-dependent. We validate this approach by computing the total energy of neutral helium using the Quantinuum H1-1 ion-trap quantum computer, enabling us to determine the ionization potential to within true chemical accuracy of the experimental value. This represents a meaningful step toward practical quantum computational chemistry and establishes a framework for benchmarking future quantum hardware using real-world chemical systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture · Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies · Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CSIRO Data61 1 , Clayton, Victoria 3168,
KPMG Futures, KPMG Australia 2 , Victoria 3008,
KPMG Futures, KPMG Australia 3 , New South Wales 2000,
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2022 · 24 · 2870010.1039/d2cp02827a ↗
2. J. Chem. Phys. · 2024 · 161 · 05470810.1063/5.0220465 ↗
3. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. · 2024 · 26 · 1818210.1039/d4cp01327a ↗
4. Int. J. Theor. Phys. · 1982 · 21 · 46710.1007/BF02650179W ↗
5. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 1999 · 83 · 516210.1103/physrevlett.83.5162 ↗
6. Phys. Rev. Res. · 2024 · 6 · 01332510.1103/physrevresearch.6.013325 ↗
7. W. van Dam , H.Liu, G. H.Low, A.Paetznick, A.Paz, M.Silva, A.Sundaram, K.Svore, and M.Troyer, “End-to-end quantum simulation of a chemical system,” arXiv:2409.05835 [quant-ph] (2024).
8. B. Toloui and P. J.Love, “Quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry based on the sparsity of the CI-matrix,” arXiv:1312.2579 [quant-ph] (2013).
9. Quantum Sci. Technol. · 2018 · 3 · 01500610.1088/2058-9565/aa9463 ↗
10. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2010 · 105 · 06300110.1103/physrevlett.105.063001 ↗
11. Mol. Phys. · 2011 · 109 · 73510.1080/00268976.2011.552441 ↗
12. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2020 · 16 · 609110.1021/acs.jctc.0c00113 ↗
13. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. · 2018 · 8 · e134010.1002/wcms.1340 ↗
14. J. Chem. Inf. Model. · 2019 · 59 · 481410.1021/acs.jcim.9b00725 ↗
15. J. Chem. Phys. · 1994 · 100 · 297510.1063/1.466439 ↗
16. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2011 · 7 · 3310.1021/ct100396y ↗
17. Phys. Rev. A · 2018 · 98 · 06233910.1103/physreva.98.062339 ↗
18. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2024 · 20 · 124410.1021/acs.jctc.3c01281 ↗
19. 1996
20. Phys. Rev. A · 2021 · 103 · 03260510.1103/physreva.103.032605 ↗
21. npj Quantum Inf. · 2023 · 9 · 6010.1038/s41534-023-00730-8 ↗
22. npj Quantum Inf. · 2020 · 6 · 4910.1038/s41534-020-0278-0 ↗
23. A. Tranter , D.Gowland, K.Yamamoto, M.Sze, and D. M.Ramo, “High-precision quantum phase estimation on a trapped-ion quantum computer,” arXiv:2506.17207 [quant-ph] (2025).
24. Nat. Commun. · 2014 · 5 · 421310.1038/ncomms5213 ↗
25. Nature · 2017 · 549 · 24210.1038/nature23879 ↗
26. Phys. Rev. X · 2018 · 8 · 03102210.1103/physrevx.8.031022 ↗
27. Quantum · 2021 · 5 · 39110.22331/q-2021-01-28-391 ↗
28. Quantum · 2020 · 4 · 37310.22331/q-2020-12-15-373 ↗
29. Phys. Rev. D · 1993 · 47 · 164010.1103/physrevd.47.1640 ↗
30. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter · 1997 · 9 · 203110.1088/0953-8984/9/9/016 ↗
31. Phys. Rev. D · 1994 · 50 · 338210.1103/physrevd.50.3382 ↗
32. Sci. Rep. · 2022 · 12 · 898510.1038/s41598-022-12324-z ↗
33. Phys. Rev. Appl. · 2024 · 21 · 06401710.1103/physrevapplied.21.064017 ↗
34. Quantum · 2024 · 8 · 138310.22331/q-2024-06-20-1383 ↗
35. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2021 · 127 · 11050310.1103/physrevlett.127.110503 ↗
36. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2017 · 119 · 18050910.1103/physrevlett.119.180509 ↗
37. Phys. Rev. X · 2021 · 11 · 04103610.1103/PhysRevX.11.041036 ↗
38. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2018 · 14 · 350410.1021/acs.jctc.8b00286 ↗
39. A. Javadi-Abhari , M.Treinish, K.Krsulich, C. J.Wood, J.Lishman, J.Gacon, S.Martiel, P. D.Nation, L. S.Bishop, A. W.Cross, B. R.Johnson, and J. M.Gambetta, “Quantum computing with Qiskit,” arXiv:2405.08810 [quant-ph] (2024).
40. Microsoft
41. 2018
42. See https://www.quantinuum.com/ for more information about Quantinuum H1-1 (2024).
43. 2000
44. See https://docs.quantinuum.com/h-series/user_guide/emulator_user_guide/noise_model.html for more information about Quantinuum Emulator Noise Model (2024).
45. Quantum Inf. Process. · 2002 · 1 · 24310.1023/a:1022144002391 ↗
46. See https://docs.quantinuum.com/h-series/user_guide/emulator_user_guide/emulators/h1_emulators.html for more information about Quantinuum System Model H1 Emulators (2024).
47. J. Chem. Theory Comput. · 2024 · 20 · 239010.1021/acs.jctc.3c01113 ↗