A Fourier feature physics-informed neural network framework for accurate mesh-free solutions of two-dimensional time-domain Maxwell equations
Source abstract
Abstract
Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) provide a mesh-free framework for solving partial differential equations but are limited by spectral bias when approximating high-frequency solutions. This work investigates the Fourier feature PINNs (FF-PINNs) for solving the two-dimensional time-domain Maxwell equations in transverse electric mode. The system is reformulated as hyperbolic type equations governing the electric and magnetic field components, where the electromagnetic fields (Ex, Ey, Hz) are approximated using fully connected neural networks trained through a composite physics-informed loss that enforces governing equations and initial and boundary conditions. To improve the representation of oscillatory wave behavior, Fourier feature embeddings are incorporated into the FF-PINN model, and a hybrid Adam–L-BFGS optimization strategy is employed to enhance convergence. Numerical experiments are performed on rectangular, circular, and L-shaped domains to evaluate performance under both smooth and irregular geometries. The results show that standard PINNs achieve reasonable solutions but exhibit reduced accuracy and slower convergence in regions with high-frequency oscillations and geometric singularities. In contrast, FF-PINNs significantly improve accuracy, convergence, and stability, yielding lower relative L2 errors and smoother field distributions, particularly near curved boundaries and re-entrant corners. Overall, the FF-PINN framework offers a robust and accurate mesh-free approach for electromagnetic wave simulations and shows strong potential for extension to higher-dimensional and frequency-domain Maxwell problems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods · Numerical methods for differential equations
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mathematics, Bule Hora University 1 , Bule Hora,
Department of Applied Mathematics, Adama Science and Technology University 2 , Adama,
References (77)
Show source-provided references
1. 1996
2. R. Alharbi , “Nonlinear parabolic stochastic partial differential equation with application to finance,” Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, 2021.
3. 2013
4. Fefferman · 201810.1017/9781108610575 ↗
5. Enhancing PINNs for solving PDEs via adaptive collocation point movement and adaptive loss weighting10.1007/s11071-023-08654-w ↗
6. 2009
7. Parameter estimation for dynamical systems using a deep neural network10.1155/2022/2014510 ↗
8. Deep domain decomposition methods: Helmholtz equation10.4208/aamm.OA-2021-0305 ↗
9. Solving forward and inverse problems of contact mechanics using physics-informed neural networks10.1186/s40323-024-00265-3 ↗
10. 2012
11. 2024
12. 1992
13. 1984
14. 1999
15. VIII. A dynamical theory of the electromagnetic field10.1098/rstl.1865.0008 ↗
16. An approach to solving Maxwell’s equations in time domain10.1016/j.jmaa.2022.126678 ↗
17. Analytical solution of Maxwell’s equations for arbitrarily moving point charges and its application for ultra-fast, high-quality simulation of electromagnetic fields10.36227/techrxiv.24087840.v2 ↗
18. Transient solutions of Maxwell’s equations based on Sumudu transform10.2528/PIER07050904 ↗
19. Heat transfer analysis of viscoelastic fluid flow with fractional Maxwell model in the cylindrical geometry10.1088/1402-4896/abc03e ↗
20. Computational electromagnetics: The finite-difference time-domain method10.1016/B978-012170960-0/50046-3 ↗
21. 1998
22. 2015
23. A three-dimensional modified finite volume technique for Maxwell’s equations10.1080/02726349008908233 ↗
24. 1996
25. Numerical integration of related Hankel transforms by quadrature and continued fraction expansion10.1190/1.1441448 ↗
26. A preliminary study on the resolution of electro-thermal multi-physics coupling problem using physics-informed neural network (PINN)10.3390/a15020053 ↗
27. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity10.1007/BF02478259 ↗
28. Deep learning10.4249/scholarpedia.32832 ↗
29. Advantages and disadvantages of artificial intelligence and machine learning: A literature review10.17605/OSF.IO/GV5T4 ↗
30. Deep learning application pros and cons over algorithm deep learning application pros and cons over algorithm10.4108/airo.v1i.19 ↗
31. Model selection for support vector machines: Advantages and disadvantages of the machine learning theory
32. 2019
33. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045 ↗
34. Numerical solution of (2 + 1)-dimensional nonlinear sine–gordon equation with variable coefficients by using an efficient deep learning approach10.1007/s00033-025-02515-9 ↗
35. Physics-informed neural ODE (PINODE): Embedding physics into models using collocation points10.1038/s41598-023-36799-6 ↗
36. A novel Fourier feature physics-informed neural networks based on the boundary element method for solving scattering of SH wave induced by complex topography10.1002/eqe.70162 ↗
37. Leveraging enhanced physics-informed neural networks based on adaptive weight loss for solving inverse problems of nonlinear Sine–Gordon equation10.1140/epjp/s13360-025-07099-x ↗
38. Physics-informed neural network with weighted loss and hard constraints for hyperbolic conservation laws10.1038/s41598-025-34263-1 ↗
39. Comparative analysis of standard PINN and gradient-enhanced PINN approaches for thin plate bending problems10.1007/s10409-025-25762-x ↗
40. Physics-informed quadratic residual neural network for solving forward and inverse problems of the two-dimensional time fractional convection-diffusion equation10.1088/1402-4896/ae50ea ↗
41. FE-PINNs: Finite-element-based physics-informed neural networks for surrogate modeling10.1063/5.0299671 ↗
42. Evolution of physics-informed neural networks: Recent architectural variants and optimization strategies10.1016/j.array.2026.100688 ↗
43. 2024
44. A practitioner’s guide to Kolmogorov–Arnold networks10.1016/j.cosrev.2026.100991 ↗
45. Physics-informed Kolmogorov–Arnold networks for power system dynamics10.1109/oajpe.2025.3529928 ↗
46. Solving 1D nonlinear magneto-quasi-static Maxwell’s equations using neural networks10.1049/smt2.12022 ↗
47. A Maxwell’s equations based deep learning method for time domain electromagnetic simulations
48. Physics-informed deep neural network for inhomogeneous magnetized plasma parameter inversion10.1109/lawp.2022.3149889 ↗
49. 2012
50. 2021
51. Stability of perfectly matched layers for Maxwell’s equations in rectangular solids10.1002/cpa.22138 ↗
52. Global solutions of Euler–Maxwell equations with dissipation10.1007/s10231-024-01538-9 ↗
53. An existence and uniqueness theorem for the Vlasov–Maxwell equations10.1080/00411457908204332 ↗
54. On solutions of Maxwell’s equations in an exterior region10.1073/pnas.38.4.342 ↗
55. A gentle introduction to physics-informed neural networks, with applications in static rod and beam problems10.15377/2409-5761.2022.09.8 ↗
56. A second-order network structure based on gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for solving parabolic partial differential equations10.3390/e25040674 ↗
57. Exploring physics-informed neural networks for the generalized nonlinear Sine–Gordon equation10.1155/2024/3328977 ↗
58. Activation functions in deep learning: A comprehensive survey and benchmark10.1016/j.neucom.2022.06.111 ↗
59. A review of activation function for artificial neural network
60. On the spectral bias of neural networks
61. Simulating seismic multifrequency wavefields with the Fourier feature physics-informed neural network10.1093/gji/ggac399 ↗
62. On the use of Fourier features-physics informed neural networks (FF-PINN) for forward and inverse fluid mechanics problems10.1177/14750902231166424 ↗
63. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks
64. Activation functions in neural networks10.33564/ijeast.2020.v04i12.054 ↗
65. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey10.5555/3122009.3242010 ↗
66. A review of automatic differentiation and its efficient implementation10.1002/widm.1305 ↗
67. A study of the optimization algorithms in deep learning
68. An effective optimization method for machine learning based on Adam10.3390/app10031073 ↗
69. Convergence and dynamical behavior of the Adam algorithm for nonconvex stochastic optimization10.1137/19M1263443 ↗
70. A modified Adam algorithm for deep neural network optimization10.1007/s00521-023-08568-z ↗
71. A progressive batching L-BFGS method for machine learning
72. PINNs for the time-domain Maxwell equations-preliminary results
73. The effect of training and testing process on machine learning in biomedical datasets10.1155/2020/2836236 ↗
74. Fourier features let networks learn high frequency functions in low dimensional domains
75. A deep learning approach: Physics-informed neural networks for solving the 2d nonlinear Sine–Gordon equation10.1016/j.rinam.2024.100532 ↗
76. 1985
77. 2008