Transition prediction for high-lift flows using a crossflow-extended RANS transition model with overset grid
Source abstract
Abstract
High-lift flow simulations remain challenging for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes methods, largely due to the coexistence of laminar separation bubbles, boundary-layer transition, wake/shear-layer interactions, and three-dimensional effects. In this work, boundary-layer transition for complex high-lift configurations is investigated using the correlation-based γ–Reθt framework implemented in the NASA CFL3D solver on overset grids. To extend applicability to swept-wing configurations, a localized crossflow-transition treatment is incorporated by augmenting the intermittency equation with a crossflow-induced production mechanism. The study is organized as a sequence of capability-building steps. First, a transonic transport configuration (CHN-T1 BWHV) is used to establish an overset-grid construction strategy and conduct a grid-convergence assessment as a baseline. Then, transition-model capability is validated using cases comprising two-dimensional and three-dimensional transition mechanisms, including a zero-pressure-gradient flat plate, the NLR-7301 two-element airfoil for overset-grid/transition behavior, and the NLF(2)-0415 infinite-span swept wing, to assess the crossflow extension. Finally, two high-lift configurations (MDA 30P/30N and the NASA trapezoidal wing) are investigated as application cases. Overall, the results show that overset-grid-based simulations provide a practical approach for investigating transition behavior in high-lift configurations, while the main findings lie in the assessed transition-model behavior and the effect of the crossflow extension. For swept-wing/high-lift configurations where crossflow instability is significant, the crossflow extension shifts the predicted transition onset upstream in crossflow-sensitive regions and improves agreement with reference transition trends. Remaining discrepancies are mainly associated with complex wake–boundary-layer mixing and three-dimensional effects, especially in flap regions, indicating the need for further robustness improvement in strongly coupled separated or interaction-dominated flows.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics · Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows · Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Shenyang Aerospace University , Shenyang, Liaoning 110136,
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. High-lift prediction workshops: Retrospective, lessons learned, and future prospects
2. A. M. Clark , C. L.Rumsey, J. P.lotnick, and L.Wang, “HLPW-5: Overview and workshop summary,” AIAA SciTech Forum, 2025.
3. Fourth high-lift prediction/third geometry and mesh generation workshops: Overview and summary10.2514/1.C037168 ↗
4. S. M. Klausmeyer and J. C.Lin, “Comparative results from a CFD challenge over a 2-D three-element high-lift airfoil,” NASA Paper No. TM-112858, 1997.
5. Efficient global optimization of advanced drop-hinged flap10.2514/1.j060048 ↗
6. Overview of the european high lift research programme EUROLIFT10.2514/6.2004-767 ↗
7. Flow structure past a canonical shape of engine/pylon/wing installation for takeoff/landing conditions10.2514/1.J058426 ↗
8. Summary of the first AIAA CFD high-lift prediction workshop10.2514/1.C031447 ↗
9. Overview and summary of the third AIAA high lift prediction workshop10.2514/1.C034940 ↗
10. Overset meshes for incompressible flows: On preserving accuracy of underlying discretizations10.1016/j.jcp.2020.109987 ↗
11. Numerical simulation of the standard model CHN-T1 based on overset grid10.7638/kqdlxxb-2018.0195 ↗
12. A correlation-based transition model using local variables for unstructured parallelized CFD codes
13. Correlation-based transition modeling for unstructured parallelized computational fluid dynamics codes10.2514/1.42362 ↗
14. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications10.2514/3.12149 ↗
15. Local correlation, compressibility, and crossflow corrections of γ-Reθ transition model for high-speed flows10.1063/5.0179475 ↗
16. CFL3D user’s manual
17. See https://github.com/nasa/CFL3D for more information about NASA CFL3D home page on GitHub.
18. Calibration of a γ-Reθt transition model and its validation in low-speed flows with high-order numerical method10.1016/j.cja.2015.03.002 ↗
19. On the application of overset meshing to numerical studies of roll damping of hulls in complex scenarios10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.116173 ↗
20. Civil aircraft standard model system and construction of aerodynamic subject database10.7527/S1000-6893.2025.32030 ↗
21. Further progress in the turbulence modelling of By-Pass transition
22. One-point closures applied to transition10.1007/978-94-015-8666-5 ↗
23. G. B. Schubauer and P. S.Klebanoff, “Contribution on the mechanics of boundary layer transition,” NACA Paper No. TN-3489, 1955.
24. B. Van Den Berg and J. H. M.Gooden, “Low-speed surface pressure and boundary layer measurement data for the NLR 7301 airfoil section with trailing edge flap,” AGARD Paper No. AR-303, II:A9, 1994.
25. Accuracy of the gamma Re-Theta transition model for simulating the DU-91-W2-250 airfoil at high Reynolds numbers10.3390/en14248224 ↗
26. J. R. Dagenhart and W. S.Saric, “Crossflow stability and transition experiments in swept-wing flow,” NASA Technical Paper No. NASA/TP-1999-209344, 1999.
27. V. D. Chin , D. W.Peters, F. W.Spaid, and R. J.McGhee, “Flowfield measurements about A multi-element airfoil at high Reynolds numbers,” AIAA Paper No. 93-3137, 1993.10.2514/6.1993-3137 ↗
28. N. J. Hildebrand , F.Li, and M. M.Choudhari, “Transition prediction for the 30P30N airfoil and the CRM-HL using FUN3D,” AIAA SciTech 2025 Forum, AIAA Paper No. 2025-1644, 2025.10.2514/6.2025-1644 ↗
29. M. Choudhari , E.Beyak, N.Hildebrand, F.Li, E.Vogel, P.Paredes, V.Srivastava, and B.Venkatachari, “Transition modeling in support of CFD vision 2030 – Highlights of recent efforts at the NASA langley Research Center,” ICAS 2024 Congress, ICAS Paper No. 2024_0081, 2024.
30. P. Johnson , K.Jones, and M.Madson, “Experimental investigation of a simplified 3D high lift configuration in support of CFD validation,” AIAA Paper No. 2000-4217, 2000.10.2514/6.2000-4217 ↗
31. C. B. McGinley , L. N.Jenkins, R. D.Watson, and A.Bertelrud, “3-D high-lift flow-physics experiment-transition measurements,” AIAA Paper No. 2005-5148, 2005.10.2514/6.2005-5148 ↗
32. P. Eliasson , A.Hanifi, and S.-H.Peng, “Influence of transition on high-lift prediction for the NASA trap wing model,” AIAA Paper No. 2011-3009, 2011.10.2514/6.2011-3009 ↗
33. 2025
34. S. Crippa and N.Krimmelbein, “Transitional flow computations of the NASA trapezoidal wing with the DLR TAU code,” AIAA Paper No. 2012-2845, 2012.10.2514/6.2012-2845 ↗
35. NASA trapezoidal wing computations including transition and advanced turbulence modeling10.2514/1.c032754 ↗
36. A. Sclafani , J.Slotnick, J.Vassberg, and T.Pulliam, “Extended OVERFLOW analysis of the NASA Trap Wing Wind tunnel model,” AIAA Paper No. 2012-2919, 2012.10.2514/6.2012-2919 ↗