journal article·2026-06-01Open access

Poloidal field coils optimization for the MANTA tokamak using TokaMaker

J. Salm, A. O. Nelson, C. Hansen, S. Guizzo, C. Paz-Soldan

AIP Advances· Volume 16· Issue 6

Abstract

Utilizing the TokaMaker code, this manuscript presents a scheme for determining the optimal locations of poloidal field coils in tokamak configurations, aimed at reducing the currents required to reproduce target equilibrium in future devices. The definition of the coil position space is described, as well as the cost function is to be minimized, which incorporates the constraints of the problem. The MANTA reactor design, featuring strong negative triangularity shaping, is considered as a test example, where preliminary results are obtained with a reduced number of degrees of freedom in order to highlight the procedure for finding local minima. Application of the optimization procedure, guided by a study of the electric current regularization parameter, results in new suggestions for the placement of each poloidal field (PF) coil. This leads to a reduction in the total current flowing through the PF coils by 37% while accurately reproducing the target plasma boundary compared to a baseline case.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Magnetic confinement fusion research · Superconducting Materials and Applications · Frequency Control in Power Systems

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC) 1 , CH-1015 Lausanne,

Columbia University 2 , New York, New York 10027,

Funding

Next Step Fusion

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. Fusion Energy · 2021 · 62 · 2
2. Phys. Plasmas · 2022 · 29 · 06210310.1063/5.0083990 ↗
3. Philos. Trans. R. Soc., A · 2025 · 383 · 2024018010.1098/rsta.2024.0180 ↗
4. Nucl. Fusion · 2017 · 58 · 01600810.1088/1741-4326/aa8e0a ↗
5. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. · 2011 · 21 · 191810.1109/tasc.2010.2092732 ↗
6. Phys. Plasmas · 2025 · 32 · 07250710.1063/5.0272085 ↗
7. Phys. Rev. Lett. · 2023 · 131 · 19510110.1103/physrevlett.131.195101 ↗
8. Fusion Eng. Des. · 2018 · 133 · 16310.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.06.004 ↗
9. Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2021 · 77 · 11910.1080/15361055.2020.1858670 ↗
10. Fusion Sci. Technol. · 2006 · 50 · 56110.13182/FST06-A1280 ↗
11. Fusion Eng. Des. · 2020 · 154 · 11154410.1016/j.fusengdes.2020.111544 ↗
12. Fusion Eng. Des. · 2023 · 191 · 11370410.1016/j.fusengdes.2023.113704 ↗
13. J. Salm , A. O.Nelson, C.Hansen, S.Guizzo, and C.Paz-Soldan, PF_location_optimization, https://github.com/jeremslm/PF_location_optimization, 2026.
14. Comput. Phys. Commun. · 2024 · 298 · 10911110.1016/j.cpc.2024.109111 ↗
15. SciPy Community, scipy.optimize.minimize—scipy documentation, https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/optimize.minimize-lbfgsb.html, 2025, accessed 11 December 2025.
16. Plasma Phys. Controlled Fusion · 2024 · 66 · 10500610.1088/1361-6587/ad6708 ↗
17. Open FUSION Toolkit Developers, MANTA example in TokaMaker, https://github.com/OpenFUSIONToolkit/OpenFUSIONToolkit/tree/main/src/examples/TokaMaker/MANTA, 2026.
18. Phys. Rev. Res. · 2024 · 6 · L02205210.1103/physrevresearch.6.l022052 ↗
19. 2004 · 108
20. 2004 · 15
21. Phys. Plasmas · 2024 · 31 · 03070210.1063/5.0190818 ↗
22. 2014 · 124
23. Open FUSION Toolkit team, Openfusiontoolkit, https://github.com/openfusiontoolkit/OpenFUSIONToolkit, 2023, accessed 03 February 2026.
24. National Academy of Engineering and National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine · 2021