journal article·2026-04-01Open access

A machine learning framework based on improved extreme gradient boosting for predicting material removal depth

Hongtao Yang, Yunlong Cheng, Xiulan Li, Haotian Bai, Ziqiang Bi, Peng Zhang

AIP Advances· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

Material Removal Depth (MRD) is a key indicator that determines the surface quality and machining accuracy in robotic grinding processes. To address the issues of insufficient accuracy and the “black-box” nature of models in current MRD prediction methods, this study proposes an MRD prediction approach that integrates an Improved Egret Swarm Optimization Algorithm (IESOA) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). The method enhances prediction performance by optimizing the hyperparameters of XGBoost using IESOA and improves model interpretability by incorporating Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed IESOA-XGBoost model achieves high predictive accuracy. Compared to XGBoost, SVR, RF, LightGBM, IESOA-SVR, IESOA-RF, and IESOA-LightGBM, its prediction accuracy is improved by 7.08%, 9.92%, 18.88%, 7.59%, 8.75%, 15.52%, and 4.36%, respectively. SHAP analysis further quantifies the influence of each process parameter on MRD, providing a clear theoretical basis for optimizing grinding process parameters and enhancing the credibility of model decision-making.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced machining processes and optimization · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Changchun University of Technology 1 , Changchun 130012, Jilin,

Engineering Technology Department, Tianjin CPC Keyuan Petroleum Engineering Co., Ltd. 2 , Tianjin 300280,

Funding

Department of Science and Technology of Jilin Province · Education Department of Jilin Province

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. Development of an automatic polishing system for metal molds and dies (1st report, automation of polishing based on CAD/CAM data)10.1299/kikaic.55.193 ↗
2. Investigations on the automatic precision polishing of curved surfaces using a five-axis machining centre10.1007/s00170-014-5774-y ↗
3. Auto-normalization algorithm for robotic precision drilling system in aircraft component assembly10.1016/j.cja.2013.02.029 ↗
4. Robotic grinding of complex components: A step towards efficient and intelligent machining–challenges, solutions, and applications10.1016/j.rcim.2019.101908 ↗
5. An adaptive modeling method for a robot belt grinding process10.1109/tmech.2010.2102047 ↗
6. A review of recent advances in robotic belt grinding of superalloys10.1007/s00170-023-11574-z ↗
7. Grinding parameters prediction under different cooling environments using machine learning techniques10.1080/10426914.2022.2116043 ↗
8. Adaptive process parameters decision-making in robotic grinding based on meta-reinforcement learning10.1016/j.jmapro.2025.02.005 ↗
9. Improvement of cutting force and material removal rate for disc milling TC17 blisk tunnels using GRA–RBF–PSO method10.1177/0954406219848473 ↗
10. Novel monitoring method for material removal rate considering quantitative wear of abrasive belts based on LightGBM learning algorithm10.1007/s00170-021-06988-6 ↗
11. Theoretical investigation and implementation of nonlinear material removal depth strategy for robot automatic grinding aviation blade10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.028 ↗
12. Material removal prediction for contact wheels based on a dynamic pressure sensor10.1007/s00170-017-0473-0 ↗
13. Modeling of material removal depth in robot abrasive belt grinding based on energy conversion10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.04.055 ↗
14. Surface roughness prediction of bearing ring precision grinding based on feature extraction10.3390/app15116027 ↗
15. Predictive modeling and analysis of material removal characteristics for robotic belt grinding of complex blade10.3390/app13074248 ↗
16. Machine learning-based modelling and meta-heuristic-based optimization of specific tool wear and surface roughness in the milling process10.3390/axioms11090430 ↗
17. Soft computing techniques for modelling and multi-objective optimization of magnetic field assisted powder mixed EDM process10.1007/s00521-022-07498-6 ↗
18. Modeling and monitoring the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding based on vision measurement and the gene expression programming (GEP) algorithm10.1007/s00170-022-08822-z ↗
19. Modelling of material removal in abrasive belt grinding process: A regression approach10.3390/sym12010099 ↗
20. Optimization of grinding process parameters based on BILSTM network and chaos sparrow search algorithm10.1177/09544089221074832 ↗
21. Material removal rate optimization with Bayesian optimized differential evolution based on deep learning in robotic polishing10.1016/j.jmsy.2024.11.014 ↗
22. Multialgorithm fusion–based intelligent decision-making method for robotic belt grinding process parameters10.1007/s00170-024-13734-1 ↗
23. In-process material removal rate monitoring for abrasive belt grinding using multi-sensor fusion and 2D CNN algorithm10.1007/s00170-022-08768-2 ↗
24. A data-driven model for predicting initial productivity of offshore directional well based on the physical constrained eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) trees10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110176 ↗
25. Prediction of laying hen house odor concentrations using machine learning models based on small sample data10.1016/j.compag.2022.106849 ↗
26. Prediction model of maximum stress for concrete pipes based on XGBoost-PSO algorithm10.1016/j.istruc.2024.107205 ↗
27. Prediction of stock price direction using a hybrid GA-XGBoost algorithm with a three-stage feature engineering process10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115716 ↗
28. Blasting mean fragment size prediction based on XGBoost and metaheuristic optimization algorithms10.1007/s11053-025-10512-y ↗
29. Egret swarm optimization algorithm: An evolutionary computation approach for model free optimization10.3390/biomimetics7040144 ↗
30. Modified whale optimization algorithm based on tent chaotic mapping and its application in structural optimization10.1007/s12205-020-0504-5 ↗
31. Application of sine cosine egret swarm optimization algorithm in gas turbine cooling system10.3390/systems10060201 ↗
32. Application of interpretable machine learning models for the intelligent decision10.1016/j.neucom.2018.12.012 ↗
33. Prediction of ground surface settlement by shield tunneling using XGBoost and Bayesian optimization10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105020 ↗
34. BoostSF-SHAP: Gradient boosting-based software for protein–ligand binding affinity prediction with explanations10.1016/j.neucom.2024.129303 ↗
35. PM2.5 concentration prediction model based on random forest and SHAP10.1142/s0218001424520128 ↗
36. An interpretable ship risk model based on machine learning and SHAP interpretation technique10.1016/j.oceaneng.2025.121686 ↗
37. Polishing of uneven surfaces using industrial robots based on neural network and genetic algorithm10.1007/s00170-017-0524-6 ↗
38. Prediction of responses in a CNC milling operation using random forest regressor10.22190/fume210728071b ↗
39. A novel material removal prediction method based on acoustic sensing and ensemble XGBoost learning algorithm for robotic belt grinding of Inconel 71810.1007/s00170-019-04170-7 ↗
40. Inverse input prediction model for robotic belt grinding10.1007/s41315-021-00165-4 ↗
41. Wear prediction of functionally graded composites using machine learning10.3390/ma17184523 ↗
42. Explainable machine learning model for predicting punching shear strength of FRC flat slabs10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.117276 ↗
43. Explainable machine learning models for predicting the axial compression capacity of concrete filled steel tubular columns10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129227 ↗
44. SHAP-based interpretation of an XGBoost model in the prediction of grindability of coals and their blends10.1080/19392699.2021.1959324 ↗