journal article·2026-04-01Open access

Progressive multi-resolution training: A training recipe for fast, three-dimensional high-resolution aerodynamic prediction

S. J. Jacob, M. Mrosek, C. Othmer, H. Koestler

AIP Advances· Volume 16· Issue 4

Abstract

The aerodynamic optimization of cars requires close collaboration between aerodynamicists and stylists, while slow, expensive simulations remain a bottleneck. Surrogate models have been shown to accurately predict aerodynamics within the design space for which they were trained. However, many of these models struggle to scale to higher resolutions because of the three-dimensional nature of the problem and data scarcity. We propose progressive multi-resolution training (PMRT), a probabilistic multi-resolution training schedule that enables training a U-Net to predict the drag coefficient (cd) and high-resolution velocity fields (512 × 128 × 128) in 24 h on a single NVIDIA H100 graphics processing unit, 7× cheaper than the high-resolution-only baseline, with similar accuracy. PMRT samples batches from three resolutions based on probabilities that change during training, starting with an emphasis on lower resolutions and gradually shifting toward higher resolutions. Since this is a training methodology, it can be adapted to other high-resolution-focused backbones. We also show that a single model can be trained across five datasets from different solvers, including a real-world dataset, by conditioning on the simulation parameters. We train both cd-only and cd + velocity models to cover applications where flow fields are either unavailable or unnecessary. In the DrivAerML dataset, our models achieve a cdR2 value of ≈0.974, matching literature baselines at a fraction of the training cost. The reduced training time keeps the time-to-first prediction on new data short, which is essential for real-world iterative vehicle development.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Model Reduction and Neural Networks · Aerodynamics and Fluid Dynamics Research · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Volkswagen AG 1 , Wolfsburg,

Chair for System Simulation, Friedrich–Alexander–Universität Erlangen–Nürnberg 2 , Erlangen,

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Current and emerging deep-learning methods for the simulation of fluid dynamics10.1098/rspa.2023.0058 ↗
2. Machine learning for fluid mechanics10.1146/annurev-fluid-010719-060214 ↗
3. Deep learning for real-time aerodynamic evaluations of arbitrary vehicle shapes10.4271/15-15-02-0006 ↗
4. K. Tangsali , R.Ranade, M. A.Nabian, A.Kamenev, P.Sharpe, N.Ashton, R.Cherukuri, and S.Choudhry, “A benchmarking framework for AI models in automotive aerodynamics,” arXiv:2507.10747 [cs.LG] (2025).
5. B. Alkin , M.Bleeker, R.Kurle, T.Kronlachner, R.Sonnleitner, M.Dorfer, and J.Brandstetter, “AB-UPT: Scaling neural CFD surrogates for high-fidelity automotive aerodynamics simulations via anchored-branched universal physics transformers,” arXiv:2502.09692 [cs.LG] (2025).
6. R. Ranade , M. A.Nabian, K.Tangsali, A.Kamenev, O.Hennigh, R.Cherukuri, and S.Choudhry, “DoMINO: A decomposable multi-scale iterative neural operator for modeling large scale engineering simulations,” arXiv:2501.13350 [cs.LG] (2025).
7. M. A. Nabian , C.Liu, R.Ranade, and S.Choudhry, “X-MeshGraphNet: Scalable multi-scale graph neural networks for physics simulation,” arXiv:2411.17164 [cs.LG] (2024).
8. Deep learning methods for Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of airfoil flows10.2514/1.J058291 ↗
9. A scalable convolutional neural network approach to fluid flow prediction in complex environments10.1038/s41598-024-73529-y ↗
10. Benchmarking convolutional neural network and graph neural network based surrogate models on a real-world car external aerodynamics dataset10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106760 ↗
11. 3D flow field estimation around a vehicle using convolutional neural networks
12. Prediction of aerodynamic flow fields using convolutional neural networks10.1007/s00466-019-01740-0 ↗
13. Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation
14. Q. Chen , M.Elrefaie, A.Dai, and F.Ahmed, “TripNet: Learning large-scale high-fidelity 3D car aerodynamics with triplane networks,” arXiv:2503.17400 [physics.flu-dyn] (2025).
15. C. Choy , A.Kamenev, J.Kossaifi, M.Rietmann, J.Kautz, and K.Azizzadenesheli, “Factorized implicit global convolution for automotive computational fluid dynamics prediction,” arXiv:2502.04317 [cs.CV] (2025).
16. Learning mesh-based simulation with graph networks
17. Learning to simulate complex physics with graph networks
18. Geometry-informed neural operator for large-scale 3D PDEs
19. 3D super-resolution model for vehicle flow field enrichment
20. EfficientNetV2: Smaller models and faster training
21. 2020
22. Progressive growing of GANs for improved quality, stability, and variation
23. Swin transformer V2: Scaling up capacity and resolution
24. Three things everyone should know about vision transformers
25. Fixing the train-test resolution discrepancy
26. FlexiViT: One model for all patch sizes
27. Patch n’ pack: NaViT, a vision transformer for any aspect ratio and resolution
28. ResFormer: Scaling ViTs with multi-resolution training
29. SNIPER: Efficient multi-scale training
30. VATT: Transformers for multimodal self-supervised learning from raw video, audio and text
31. 2022 · 10799
32. fVDB: A deep-learning framework for sparse, large scale, and high performance spatial intelligence10.1145/3658226 ↗
33. O-CNN: Octree-based convolutional neural networks for 3D shape analysis10.1145/3072959.3073608 ↗
34. Deep high-resolution representation learning for visual recognition10.1109/tpami.2020.2983686 ↗
35. N. Ashton , C.Mockett, M.Fuchs, L.Fliessbach, H.Hetmann, T.Knacke, N.Schonwald, V.Skaperdas, G.Fotiadis, A.Walle, B.Hupertz, and D.Maddix, “DrivAerML: High-fidelity computational fluid dynamics dataset for road-car external aerodynamics,” arXiv:2408.11969 [physics.flu-dyn] (2025).
36. P. Sharpe , R.Ranade, K.Tangsali, M. A.Nabian, R.Cherukuri, and S.Choudhry, “Accelerating transient CFD through machine learning-based flow initialization,” arXiv:2503.15766 [cs.LG] (2025).
37. M. Mrosek , C.Othmer, and R.Radespiel, “Variational autoencoders for model order reduction in vehicle aerodynamics,” AIAA Paper No. AIAA 2021-3049, 2021.10.2514/6.2021-3049 ↗
38. Introduction of a new realistic generic car model for aerodynamic investigations
39. DrivAerNet++: A large-scale multimodal car dataset with computational fluid dynamics simulations and deep learning benchmarks
40. Reduced-order modeling of vehicle aerodynamics via proper orthogonal decomposition10.4271/06-12-03-0016 ↗
41. Application of detached-Eddy simulation for automotive aerodynamics development
42. OpenVDB: An open-source data structure and toolkit for high-resolution volumes
43. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation
44. Squeeze-and-excitation networks
45. Concurrent spatial and channel ‘squeeze & excitation’ in fully convolutional networks
46. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on ImageNet classification
47. Group normalization
48. Cyclical learning rates for training neural networks
49. Deep networks with stochastic depth
50. M. A. Nabian and S.Choudhry, “A mixture of experts gating network for enhanced surrogate modeling in external aerodynamics,” arXiv:2508.21249 [cs.LG] (2025).
51. 2022
52. Kornia: An open source differentiable computer vision library for PyTorch