Magnetic orientation of rod-shaped diamagnetic crystals in rotating magnetic fields based on real-time observation and the analysis of orientation conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
Controlling the orientation of materials using a rotating magnetic field is an essential noncontact technology for developing functional materials; however, the optimal application conditions cannot yet be regarded as fully elucidated. In this study, we used a unique in situ observation system to compare and examine the alignment behavior of diamagnetic cellulose crystals under four different rotating magnetic field patterns. The experimental results revealed that the pattern involving a continuous unidirectional rotating magnetic field achieved the fastest alignment by promoting orientation through a more uniform rotational torque than step angular changes. In the case of a quadrupole electromagnet, unidirectional rotation aligned the material more efficiently than repetitive rotation because of its ability to efficiently reset the magnetic hysteresis of the electromagnet. This study is the first to experimentally demonstrate that the efficiency of magnetic alignment is strongly dependent not only on the conventional rotation period, but also on the application pattern, which includes factors such as the direction of rotation and the continuity of angular change. These findings offer new guidelines for the development of new materials that require precise structural control.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Magnetic and Electromagnetic Effects · Advanced Antenna and Metasurface Technologies · Magnetic Bearings and Levitation Dynamics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Muroran Institute of Technology 1 , Muroran 050-8585,
Faculty of Science, Shinshu University 2 , Matsumoto 390-8621,
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
References (24)
Show source-provided references
1. Polymers · 2020 · 12 · 149110.3390/polym12071491 ↗
2. Sci. Rep. · 2020 · 10 · 1060310.1038/s41598-020-67352-4 ↗
3. AIP Adv. · 2020 · 10 · 01503210.1063/1.5130062 ↗
4. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 05671510.1063/1.5006409 ↗
5. AIP Adv. · 2018 · 8 · 05670410.1063/1.5006135 ↗
6. Chin. Phys. B · 2019 · 28 · 04830110.1088/1674-1056/28/4/048301 ↗
7. Chem. Lett. · 2012 · 41 · 157610.1246/cl.2012.1576 ↗
8. AIP Adv. · 2021 · 11 · 02504110.1063/9.0000168 ↗
9. J. Appl. Phys. · 2025 · 137 · 21490310.1063/5.0259921 ↗
10. Cellulose · 2021 · 28 · 675710.1007/s10570-021-03954-z ↗
11. Langmuir · 2005 · 21 · 203410.1021/la0475728 ↗
12. Carbohydr. Polym. · 2020 · 247 · 11668810.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116688 ↗
13. Prog. Mater. Sci. · 2024 · 143 · 10125110.1016/j.pmatsci.2024.101251 ↗
14. Langmuir · 2005 · 21 · 480510.1021/la050182g ↗
15. Appl. Phys. Express · 2008 · 1 · 11170110.1143/apex.1.111701 ↗
16. 2006
17. Yamaguchi · 2024
18. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. · 2020 · 40 · 433210.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2020.05.012 ↗
19. Open Ceram. · 2024 · 20 · 10069710.1016/j.oceram.2024.100697 ↗
20. Appl. Phys. Express · 2021 · 14 · 056503
21. J. Appl. Phys. · 2014 · 115 · 17B51910.1063/1.4866520 ↗
22. J. Appl. Crystallogr. · 2016 · 49 · 210010.1107/s160057671601534x ↗
23. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. · 2009 · 48 · 020001
24. CrystEngComm · 2018 · 20 · 86110.1039/c7ce01305a ↗